One of the biggest revelations to
come out of the debate, held at the CBS Broadcast Center in Manhattan, was Spitzer's promise to work for $ 1 a year, just as Mayor Michael Bloomberg has done since taking office in 2002.
Hans Ulrich Obrist: Well that is what we are hoping will
come out of the debate over the Map Marathon.
Not exact matches
Trump's long - running feud with Fox News - turned - NBC News anchor Megyn Kelly began after the first presidential primary
debate, when he tweeted that «she had blood
coming out of her wherever» while Kelly was questioning him.
Senate Republicans
came out of 20 hours
of debate with a stunning failure in their efforts to overhaul the US healthcare system — and Sen. John McCain
of Arizona cast a decisive vote.
Trump responded by going into attack mode, including making a now - famous controversial remark about Kelly having «blood
coming out of her wherever» during the
debate.
In a set - up that sounds like something
out of «The Hunger Games,» once a year managers
come together to review employees» work and
debate their standings.
That ad uses video clip from Trump's attack on Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly in protest
of her questioning
of him at a
debate of Republican presidential contenders last August when he said afterward that blood was «
coming out of her eyes,
coming out of her wherever.»
Since then, additional high - profile studies have
come out — including an article, published in the journal
of Psychological Science in the Public Interest, which found no evidence that brain games improve everyday cognition — but the topic is still very much up for
debate.
He began
coming out of his shell in high school, joining a
debate team.
And he has recently
come under fire for sitting
out of the gun
debate.
Giuliani himself suggested that politics played a role in crafting the agreement, saying on Fox, «Imagine if that [Stormy Daniels's story]
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the, you know, last
debate with Hillary Clinton.»
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15, 2016 in the middle
of the, you know, last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Giuliani said.
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15th, 2016, in the middle
of the, you know, last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» he said.
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15th, 2016, in the middle
of the, you know, last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Giuliani told Fox News's «Fox & Friends.»
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Mr Giuliani said.
My hope is that a few people will have a good laugh and maybe a few more will take it seriously enough to investigate for themselves the Bitcoin scaling
debate instead
of accepting the slavish dogmatism
coming out of the Core community.
However, it's still unclear who will
come out on top
of the ASIC / large - scale mining
debate.
Rudy Giuliani said, this morning, «Imagine if that
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton» — a reference to the payment.
«Imagine if [the Daniels affair]
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» he said, apparently under the impression that linking the story to its potential electoral consequences would make the money seem less connected to the election.
To be sure, the immediate Monday night market reaction to the
debate could reverse, and analysts were quick to point
out that there are still two more presidential
debates to
come ahead
of the November election.
And as we saw in this week's UCP leadership
debate, only Calgary lawyer Doug Schweitzer was willing to
come out in support
of gay rights, taking Kenney to task for his silence.
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Giuliani told host Steve Doocy.
«Imagine if that
came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Giuliani
«Imagine if that
came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle
of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton,» Giuliani said.
And while I didn't think the administration's policy was very smart on that — I'd been on the losing side in the internal
debate — this was the administration's policy and I was
coming out of the administration.
When it
comes to the
debate before us, if enough voices
of reason speak
out — and both sides offer up something to sacrifice without harming people in need — we can all join together to help save both our nation's fiscal security and its benevolent soul.
While he allows that doctrinal
debates about Christ and the Trinity are
of only antiquarian interest, he
comes out for what he calls a «redemptive process» in which good people do not give up on the goal
of establishing the kingdom
of God on earth.
While drama was needed to heat the
debate up again, zeal for reform is likely to cool as the refinements
of law are worked
out in the
coming year.
Speaking
of coming out, notice all the US emergent players and those who ply their wares who are silent during this
debate.
Write an article that panders even a bit to religionists, and they
come out in droves yapping about how the sky fairy wants us to do good works, and then
debating their various versions
of mythology.
Ken Ham challenged Bill Nye to a
debate, even while Ken Ham continues to run from me and my proposal that he «
come out» and «
come clean» regarding his positions relating to my argument that so many
of his followers rail against but which quite properly is able to demonstrate why it is, in part, that young - earth creation - science promoters have failed in their scientific pretensions and legal challenges.
I hope Kohn can
come to know better the millions
of loving Christians who believe in the traditional definition
of marriage and
debate with them respectfully, rather than cast them
out of civil discourse.
There was this time during the Cain boom when he had just spent the section
of a
debate dealing with criticism
of 9 -9-9 by crouching in a fetal position and chanting «you haven't read the analysis, you haven't read the analysis» (rhetorically
of course) and the sexual harassment stuff
came out.
In a
debate with an advocate for abortion, one occasionally
comes up against an informed opponent who seeks to undermine the Church's position on the issue by pointing
out that the Universal Doctor
of the Church, St Thomas Aquinas, held to the doctrine
of delayed animation or hominisation.
Kass ably led the council members in a long
debate on cloning, with the result that earlier this year they
came out in opposition to human cloning but divided on the use
of cloned embryos for research purposes.
You above all others have seemed to find a way past most anyone's insecurities to welcome and
debate opposing points
of view and still
come out with an appreciation for that person's contributions.
Out of this
came a lot
of debate about original sin, the evil
of human nature, and all the mental gymnastics to sustain that stuff.
Religion and State are separated, unlike some strange places which we actually fear and hate (Iran
comes to mind)... I, for one, believe that this should teach us to keep religion
OUT of the social
debate.
When push
comes to shove, is this
debate really about the symbolic denigration
of a religious practice, or is the worry that once some parents find
out about the risks, they'll reject received dogma and discard the practice?
I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were
debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would
come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string
of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll
come back to bite us.
When people
debate Rodgers» legacy at Anfield, his fans will point the 2013/14 season as an incredible achievement — one that, in many ways, would ultimately cost him his job as it was a title challenge that
came much earlier than expected; the club were ahead
of schedule in terms
of building a competitive side, and the emotional turmoil
of ultimately losing
out on the final day
of the season meant there was simply no recovery.
Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player
of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years
of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes
out with an injury for about five months who
comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still
debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count
of the number
of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand
out in a smaller club.
David De Gea, on the other hand, will be a topic
of debate in weeks to
come, as he was found wanting on one or two instances with his clearances and was certainly to blame for the second City goal, where he let in a speculative shot from Dzeko from thirty yards
out.
We'll discuss un-winning mentalities, overuse the word «microcosm» and
debate whether or not Gooners can be sent to Hell for wishing for a Sp * rs Premiership title before turning our attention to the good old days
of Arsenal's Invincibles, the shifting North American scouting network and how to get Arsene Wenger to write the foreword in your book with former Arsenal player and current Arsenal scout Danny Karbassiyoon, whose own account
of highs and lows while playing for Arsenal are fleshed
out in his new title The Arsenal Yankee, which
comes out in early May.
sad but true, it is all extremely competitive (hence all the references to it in online situations in the comments above) and i try to absent myself from those kinds
of situations / friendships / occasions whenever possible (including stepping away from certain blogs, especially those which
debate the merits
of washing the white stuff off washed organic carrots) btw to me your post
came out as a long - drawn
out whine apology about being judged as judging - one thing i learned in presenting my work was to never apologise for it, period.
This assessment re-opened the
debate of what caused the NDC's heavy defeat and reinforced calls for the leadership to be booted
out though their tenure would officially
come to an end in 2018.
This shouldn't
come as a big surprise, since Davis had already signaled his intention to pull
out of debating.
During the 2006 gubernatorial campaign, then - AG Eliot Spitzer surprised some members
of his own staff by
coming out against the legalization
of medical marijuana during a pre-primary
debate with fellow Democrat and then - Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi.
When, for example, he attracts criticism for saying he admires Vladimir Putin in a magazine interview, Alastair Campbell is blamed for having «trapped» him into saying it; when he loses the first TV
debate it's because he allowed himself «to be persuaded to act
out of character»; and when it
comes to the declining value
of Brent crude Salmond writes breezily that «no - one really knows what the price
of oil is going to be in the short term», despite having spent several years arguing precisely the contrary.
Cuomo has
come out strongly in favor
of the unions in the 421a
debate and has made clear that he won't approve any tax abatement program unless it's deemed a «fair deal by organized labor and by the building trades.»