Sentences with phrase «come out of viewing»

The Christian practice that directly or indirectly supported colonialism and capitalism comes out of this view of «humans above nature».

That specifically came out of a viewing of Claude Chabrol's «Les Bonnes Femmes,» and the turn in that film which I found so incredibly striking and unexpected.

Not exact matches

Cook called for unity among Apple workers regardless of their political views, and came out against remarks Trump made during a Tuesday press conference equating far - right hate groups with the people protesting them.

Which probably should be enough to convince you to view that slumbering employee as a productivity ninja rather than a slacker, but if you need even more convincing, yet another study on the benefits of napping just came out.

From the point of view of society, Japan is going to come out ahead in the next crisis.

«From a strategic point of view, we also focus on things where software, hardware and services all come together and bring out the magic that only Apple can,» he says.

The Blue Chip Economic Survey just came out with an upbeat view of a second - half recovery.

«I also think the younger generations... their view of their careers is very portable, they're not going to sign on to a place out of college and work there and retire, so they need to make sure they're squeezing everything they can out of each employment opportunity when it comes to their retirement,» he said.

Much of this, Cornell said, came out of a Cincinnatus view toward guns and defense — a reference to the legendary Roman general who, according to the story (and possibly myth), went back to farming instead of attempting to seize more power after he led the Romans to victories.

The report comes out each year and offers an in - depth view of commercial and residential real estate trends.

But even the most orthodox of Jews will admit that GeHenna (named after the dump outside Jerusalem that existed in the Valley of Hinnom and whilch was considered the most unclean of places, where the «fires never went out» and the «worm never died»... a reference seen in Isaiah...) was an idea adapted from Babylonian theology (taken from Zoasterism), not an idea originally developed in the Tanach (thus you will find references to «the world to come» and «tikkun Olam» only in the Talmud, not in the Tanach... which for Jews is not a problem since our view of «scripture» is not the same as a Christians).

kendallpeak I was merely pointing out that the Bible, a book that you likely consider authoritative regarding God's supposed view of abortion, not only has numerous sections that illustrate that a fetus was not considered a person in those times, but that the Jewish people, whose books these references come from, have upheld that interpretation.

Mankowski, who holds quite different views on ordaining women, agrees with Weakland that it would have been much better if the writers of the pastoral came right out and said what they mean by lamenting the sins of sexism in a hierarchical church.

Last time it was an article about «atheist pastors coming out» and atheists made it seem like they officially «won», and now it's one girl who switched her views and theists are parading it around like it's some sort of proof for god.

Precisely where God comes out for the building of Israeli settlements on land formerly controlled by Palestinians is not clear to me, but the Republican parade to the Holy Land seems united in its view that Obama's efforts to curtail those settlements are wrongheaded at best and sinful at worst.

A 1922 letter to the Politburo sets forth Lenin's view of the campaign against the church: «For us this moment is not only exceptionally favorable but generally the only moment when we can, with ninety - nine out of a hundred chances of total success, smash the enemy and secure for ourselves an indispensable position for many decades to comes.

There is nothing inherently wrong with pointing out that other Bible teachers and scholars agree with your views, but the trouble comes in when some people seem ignorant of the fact that there are many good and respectable Bible teachers and scholars who disagree.

The same could be said of logic; you can get numbers and logic to dance any way you want and come out to affirm whatever view you believed in the first place.

De Chardin made two important points: firstly that the science of man seems to come out decisively in favour of monophyletism and secondly that any decision for or against monogenism must ultimately elude science in view of the depth of time that has elapsed since the creation of man.

This shift largely came as a result of increased access to information (printing press), a new, more scientific view of the world, and the rise of humanism (which is to basically say that human beings had been given the faculties to «figure it all out» for themselves).

Both came to the same conclusion based on their insider's view of the Central Intelligence Agency: the fundamental purpose of the CIA is not information gathering, as most citizens believe; it is to carry out disinformation campaigns in service to illegal presidential objectives.

This would be a comfortable way out of the impasse if we could think so, for in view of the fact that the end of the world has not yet come, it is not easy to fit into the rest of his words such sayings as, «Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom» (Matt.

At Washington Bible College and Capital Bible Seminary they taught you how to think thru heretical arguments in light of scripture and come to reason it out for yourself AND how can any CHristian Apologist be worth anything if they don't know and understand the heretical views that oppose Orthodox Christianity!?

It is a call to come out of the ignorance of our killing prejudices, the blindness of presuming that our view of life is objective, the slavery that comes with identifying our partial truth with the ultimate truth.

What our authors are saying through all this structure of imagery is that the obscure birth of a child to a carpenter's wife was, in view of all that came out of it, a decisive moment in history, when something genuinely new began, and the traffic of two worlds was initiated, to be traced by the discerning eye all through the story that was to follow.

The note sounded by both Chomsky and Roy is admittedly rather shrill, but we must consider that their dissent comes at a time when much of the world seems content with President Bush's view that this attack was simply an attempt by «evildoers» to snuff out «the beacon light of freedom» in the world.

But if you are going to stand on the side of the literalists and fundamentalists, then you have to understand, from the point of view of someone on the other side, you will come out looking as bad as they look.

Can you not come up with a better world view than the hogwash of antiquated, out - of - touch, religious dogma?

So though we can understand why Mark could come to this curious view (perhaps at the close of a career as an apostle that did not have the success he had expected), we must reject it as a true reflection of Jesus» mind, and as out of keeping with the other things we know about his teaching.

I hope that good can come out of this for Dr. Hawkins and that she will find a position that is both more fulfilling for her personally and where she is free to express a view, as this is, that is not inconsistent with the Christian faith without it resulting in difficulty for her from fellow so - called Christians.

When I first came out, one of my closest friends, who I came out to before I was comfortable enough to make my orientation widely known, was a Christian who believed the heteronormative view of the bible (and to the best of my knowledge still does) but she was extremely loving towards me and a wonderful support at a time when I really needed it.

Interesting... I viewed Pat as a person who had «come out» of the IC.

To resolve this and out of respect for this being your blog and for the views you and others express I shall therefore, again, do as I say when your posts come up about pastor abuse and limit what I wrote or avoid being involved.

This certainly does not fit with the Christian view of God as one who is seeking out sinners in love, calling them to turn and come.

As Griffin himself admits, the plausibility of a theodicy is ultimately tied to the plausibility of the overall world - view out of which it comes.

You above all others have seemed to find a way past most anyone's insecurities to welcome and debate opposing points of view and still come out with an appreciation for that person's contributions.

What is striking is that reflection coming out of life experience and Biblical study in communities that have taken for granted the reality of God converge so far with the ideas of God that come from those who have wrestled with, and proposed alternatives to, the dominant philosophical views.

Kaufman affirms that the radicals» emphasis on a suffering God can best be expressed in terms of the dipolar view of God that comes out of process philosophy.6 Finally, Altizer himself recognizes that it is process theology «that is expected most profoundly to challenge a death of God theology.»

He just came out with a book about the three views of hell.

The more evangelicals come out in favor of Trump's policies, he said, the more they exclusively view Islam as a threat rather than a ministry opportunity.

Other than religous views, natural disasters aren't just gonna come out of no where!

And not everything that came out of Paul's mouth (or those who forged his name on their views) represents absolute truth.

I'm personally glad that religious people, ignorant citizens, and bigots have come out of the closet and loudly proclaim their views in a public forum.

Moreover, I carefully pointed out that ethicists on this issue can basically be divided into two camps: those that view aborted fetuses as cadavers of a medical procedure and think that some good should come from abortions, and those that view aborted fetuses as victims of oppression, sin, and thoughtlessness, and therefore think that these victims should not be further exploited» especially under the guise of a «good cause.»

In his view, religious meaning grows out of, comes in and through, the other, more «objective» dimensions of human experience, while being neither exhaustible in terms of them nor separable from them.

Such places and activities the precincts of faith where redemption comes into view again as the perfection the world cries out for.

As Cohn points out, Zoroaster's view that «the time would come when, in a prodigious final battle, the supreme god and his supernatural allies would defeat the forces of chaos and their human allies and eliminate them once and for all» deeply influenced certain Jewish groups which, in turn, «influenced the Jesus sect, with incalculable consequences».7

It is not definitive, they're sites for further research and support (research thoroughly, especially when it comes to health matters, and I would recommend taking a generalised view), whether for their good information, or as examples of what is out there to peruse.

In my view (and I know I a lot of dislikes for this 1) I say lets drop out lets be smart... even if we come second we will still have to face a team that finished first and if we draw another AS Monaco type team and loose that could do damage to our momentum (if we still have it ta that point).

It seems to me you are getting quite desperate in your desire to Manage our club as we are most certainly going backwards in regards our League position.Could it be you have finally come to realise the club is already planning for life without you?Could it be you have been found out at long last that your prehistoric and outdated views of management are not what the club needs to get us out of the massive pile of SHIT we find ourselves in because of you?