Sentences with phrase «come to a mutual agreement on»

As long as you hold the copyright, you can license the IP to anyone you want, or not, for any terms you can come to mutual agreement on how long, and for how much.

As such, we think we should all come to a mutual agreement on how to end the contract.

If you didn't come to an agreement during the course of your interview, you may want to have a discussion with your supervisor as soon as possible to see if you can come to a mutual agreement on what you will be expected to do.

The idea behind collaborative law is that both parties, no matter what disagreements they have, will have to work together to come to a mutual agreement on the terms of the divorce.

It is also important to come to a mutual agreement on how to handle a situation.

In Minnesota, it is preferred that parents come to a mutual agreement on child custody.

Not exact matches

The key for both monogamous and open / polyamorous relationships is to have open and honest communication with one's partner about the situation, to come to mutual agreements to protect the integrity and commitment of the relationship and to revisit the agreement periodically to ensure you're both still on the same page about things or to determine if modifications need to be made.

Training a dog is making a social connection across species; it's establishing a mutual language and coming to an agreement on how the two of us can share the same home and the same world.

Some come to an agreement fairly quickly and ready to move on with the divorce, but most have issues which will take months to find a mutual agreeable agreement.

«I had been talking to my firm for some time about me working a little less and the firm and I came to a mutual agreement that I would allow my name to continue with the firm and if there was any business developed in the GTA that I could act on it but only through the firm and not my own name.

Details have yet to emerge on the settlement, but the Pennsylvania personal injury attorneys for the parties say that the two women met on their own outside the presence of attorneys and came to a mutual agreement.

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

The two companies had clearly come to an agreement that benefitted their mutual interests — for Amazon, that meant getting its streaming video app onto Apple TV devices; and for Apple, it meant getting its streaming media player on Amazon.com's retail site again.

Partners may come to a mutual agreement about what's fair or may rely on the court's help in splitting the marital assets fairly.