Sentences with phrase «come to conclusions because»

They can be slow to come to conclusions because of their cautious and meticulous nature which is important for sales professionals to keep in mind.

We came to this conclusion because the company determined that it was more likely than not that the majority of its valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets would be utilized.

No scientist comes to a conclusion because it's «convenient».

They have come to this conclusion because they see the bible as linear, every verse is as authoritative and truthful as any other verse.

I come to this conclusion because you have yet to respond to the scripture references I have offered in my previous comments.

You came to this conclusion because I don't think everything is hunky dory as you seem to believe?

You came to this conclusion because of one, or more, of the following: abnormal poop, gas, skin reactions.

Certainly, when I spoke to Mr Corbyn late last night a fair few times on the phone he said that he felt that it was an attack on him and that he'd come to the conclusion because of that, and one or two other things, that I shouldn't continue.»

I came to that conclusion because you stated fibroids don't cause heavier bleeding unless they are submucosal which account for 10 % or less of all uterine fibroids.

(I came to this conclusion because of the nature of ecological design, the nature of social activism, and my experiences doing both in Detroit.

The inspector general's report, however, was unable to come to a conclusion because Solomon's description of advice she received on providing files related to the climate panel lay in the arena of «she says, he says,» with little sign of a route forward.

I come to this conclusion because I believe that if the mTBI symptoms were more than very mild, they would have been picked up by Dr. Koss who I find to be a very thorough and careful practitioner who has special training in the area of concussions.

Ms. Punzo came to that conclusion because Line 150 income, which is presumptive, was not used and none of the other exceptions applied.

Not exact matches

But when it comes to coddling smaller companies just because they are small, the IMF is unequivocal in its conclusion.

Many entrepreneurs come to the conclusion that because they are finally responsible, they should make all the decisions.

The reason people come to that kind of natural conclusion is because they see waste or they see inefficiency or they see a lack of transparency.

If I were making the decisions, I would invite the leader's from all the political parties to join the televised debate, but because the decision is being made by a private television company I can understand how they came to this conclusion.

Each trade we take needs careful planning and consideration and we never want to rush to enter a trade because it's far better to miss an opportunity than it is to jump to a conclusion that we came to emotionally rather than logically.

Automakers such as Ford have come to the same conclusion, pushing for full autonomy because there's a danger in providing so much self - driving assistance that the driver is lulled into complacency and can't retake control of the vehicle quickly.

But even if I am horribly wrong and am sinning, do you think our God will send me to everlasting torment because I applied cultural context to scripture and came to the conclusion that it is ok?

I would also imagine that a million years from now if an evolutionary thinking society finds the bones of a Dachsund then finds the bones a a Great Dane they will come to the conclusion the Dachsund because it is smaller — or was found deeper in the muck?

Picking a position, or coming to a conclusion, because the facts you're presented with point towards that conclusion is not «giving up».

One thing I found really interesting is that one conclusion the book came to is that these «faith wars» had a direct impact on the fall of the Roman Empire because the gov» t had to deal with the internal struggle and the external enemies had to take a back seat in importance or at least drastically distracted the leadership.

You're little scene you gave me is patently false because I don't imemdiately jump to the conclusion of materilization, but I guess since this is how you learn, lets go: Chad and Chuckles are walking in the woods Me: Hey cool, a watch, I wonder where it came from Chad: stupid question, it came from god, but I guess if you want to get more specific, someone probably dropped it Me: you're right, lets check to see if someone is missing a watch - Chad and Chuckles head to town, post signs and after no success for many weeks, decide that the person who dropped it probably isn't around.

In the end all you are doing is just relying on your own belief because even though there is no proof that that there actually is no deity who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop our faith in said deity, since there is thus far no irrefutable proof that there is such a deity, that you then come to a conclusion that there is no such deity, all you are doing is just relying on belief just like I'm relying on belief and that what it really boils down to is just that it is all a matter of belief.

When I say blindly it is because I know many, many, many religious people that believe what they believe because someone told them to, not because they have studied the material and come to their own conclusions as you have.

Sam: So you're answer is «I know god exists because I thought about it and came to the conclusion that he does»?

So, like you, it was the really hard - core, honest Calvinism that became the impetus for me to abandon Calvinism entirely, because God showed me through it all what the logical conclusions of Calvinist thinking will come to.

You don't even realize you are doing it... but you just accused us of dishonesty because we have come to a different conclusion than you have.

Hitler may have come to certain conclusions but not because of Darwin.

Anyway, we have come to the conclusion that YES, God is God and he can do whatever HE wants, but He can never act outside of HIs character, and when we understand God's character is good and loving and compassionate and so on, then we are not threatened by Him doing what he wills, because we know His will is always good.

I ask for examples and not a «just google it» because after having done my research on matters such as these I've come to a conclusion and I've googled many of these.

I'm an atheist because when I did my own research and critical thinking on history, comparitive analysis of many different religions and personal refelction I came to my own conclusions.

I can't say that everyone would experience the same thing if everyone did what I did because not everyone who claims to have done the same thing have also stated that they had the same type of experiences nor have they come to the same conclusions as I have.

The reason for our disbelief is because we have read the bible with an open - mind and we have listened to what the updated evidence says and we have come to the conclusion that outside of your holy book, there is no evidence for your god.

I have finally come to grips with the fact that church work will not be a significant part of my life in this location — a profoundly discouraging conclusion, because there's so little else to do in this town, and I can not move away any time soon — but not before going through a prolonged (and continuing) grieving process for the loss of something I loved that had been a part of my life for so long.

The conclusion of the Book of Isaiah (66:23 - 24) is particularly noteworthy because the penultimate verse asserts in wondrous fashion that «all flesh shall come to worship me, whereas the final verse moves in the opposite direction of harsh judgment on those who rebel.

and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

As if, everyone would come to the same conclusion as you, because you have found all the answers.

Disagree with the other person if you want to, but recognize that they are trying to understand and explain the text just as much as you are, and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

Third, when the previous strategies fail, we may come to the conclusion that saving the relationship is impossible because the chasm between us is too great.

I did indeed support the change of the policy in the end because upon reflection, I came to the conclusion that the seminary is an academic institution and not a denomination.

I don't want to rewrite this article in english, but basically, I came to the following conclusions 1 - that Scriptures ought to be used in close interaction with daily reality (not out the blue, in abstraction, or in academic ivory tower) 2 - it ought to be interpreted by what we could call «crucified» christians 3 - and that «crucified» christian should interpret in the context of a «crucified» community / church (because being in a close knit church is a very good way to actually be «crucified» and sanctified, and because I need insight from others in my interpretations.

Is it because others told you a story which appealed to you, or is it because you rationally and logically analyzed it and came to a conclusion about what you believe?

Just because someone comes to a different conclusion, doesn't mean you should assume they didn't do any work to arrive there or that they don't think there could be an answer.

This means one of two things: 1) you have met one, possibly two sets of gay parents total (which I might actually believe because statistically you could not have come across that many gay parents) and that you certainly don't have enough information to make ANY conclusion on gay parents based on the few that you have met, or 2) you are lying by claiming you have met many gay parents (statistically a low probability), and that they are ALL abusers (a statistical improbability).

I have come to this conclusion partly because of the influence of the University of Chicago's approach to graduate education, and partly because of the view of the purposes of liberal education to which my teaching has led me.

I don't come to the same conclusions as you not because of lack of reading but because I have read widely and engaged with diverse views.

If Evolution is the truth about origin of life, than you would come to some type of conclusion that something is true «because Evolution says so» when you boil it down.

But each time I read books, blogs or articles about the topic (granted that I am more inclined to read stuff written by people who are really serious about their relationship with God rather than people complaining merely because they can — and thereâ $ ™ s plenty of them), I come to one conclusion: The complaints are mostly about what the church has become (or how people perceive the church to be) than against the church itself.