Sentences with phrase «comes as scientists»

The study comes as scientists have predicted proliferation of these blooms as the climate changes, and amid increasing attention by the news media and local politicians to the worst cases.

The news comes as scientists in the country confirmed locally produced bean sprouts as the like cause of the outbreak.

For example a century ago, the only transportation was the horse riding or camel or donkey and so on... you can not imagine at that time people would be thinking about travelling the globe in a day or two... and we do not know what is coming as every scientists theory is being abrogated by a new scientist and the old one becomes obsolete... these also proves that human theory can not be perfect and will never be perfect... there will always be modifications...

Not exact matches

Maybe the clearest and most dystopian glimpse of where all of this is headed comes courtesy of Tim Hwang, who breeds artificially intelligent «socialbots» as co-founder and chief scientist of the Orwellian - sounding Pacific Social Architecting Corporation.

He was an American original, in a way only an immigrant can be — a thick - accented, scientist - turned - businessman who spoke forcefully and wrote gracefully in English on topics as varied as his management philosophy, his battle with prostate cancer, and his story of coming to the U.S. Grove was famously profane, harsh, driven, and driving.

It should come as a surprise to no one that the list is heavy on tech jobs — data scientist, solutions architect, mobile developer.

So now almost ten times as many scientists — 15,364 to be precise — have come together to give us a «second notice.»

As the worst environmental impacts come from farming ruminants such as cattle and sheep, the scientists also recommend a shift towards «mostly plant - based foods.&raquAs the worst environmental impacts come from farming ruminants such as cattle and sheep, the scientists also recommend a shift towards «mostly plant - based foods.&raquas cattle and sheep, the scientists also recommend a shift towards «mostly plant - based foods.»

That a passing bird dropping stale bread can neutralize a multi-billion dollar scientific facility comes as no surprise to anyone who has experienced delay on the Toronto subway — where flakes of snow can shut down the system for months — but two scientists have come up with a novel alternative theory for the disruption: time traveling terrorists.

According to History.com, the «first workable prototype of the Internet came in the late 1960s with the creation of ARPANET, or the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network,» and the online world as we know it today really did not take on its form until 1990, when Tim Berners - Lee, a computer scientist, invented the World Wide Web.

This week's guest is Poppy Crum, chief scientist at Dolby Laboratories, who came on the show as part of an IEEE event at SXSW last month.

again... scientist and atheist will probably come up with some BS explanation but when it comes down to it... there is a beginning to everything... as well as an end.

«We believe that scientists have done this & that, always coming up w / reasons as to why we exist today & how the earth came about, doing everything to «prove» that there is no God.»

As an environmental scientist, I'll tell you now, we can trace how the earth works and why things happe, but we can't figure out where the initial:: click:: of energy came from.

And they worried continually at what he might come up with, as in his remark in 1981 that «trees cause more pollution than automobiles» (a claim that scientists more than two decades later discovered to be not entirely off - base).

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all preScientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all prescientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

«All we can hope for is serendipity — that a scientist as inquisitive as the one looking in the lobster's mouth and marvelling at S pandora will come across evil, maybe from the preserved brains of those afflicted....

Well at least my views aren't as crazy as those scientists who think we came from a fish or aliens!»

Since employing alternately the mathematics associated with particles and that associated with waves has led to a vast expansion of information about the subatomic world, many scientists have come to regard this new approach as satisfactory and adequate.

When it come to matters of science, I believe scientists such as Hawking.

However, the importance of this perspective is only now beginning to come to light as modern science has revealed a dynamic and developing universe, which some scientists recognise in the «anthropic principle».

He no longer seeks the mystery, the divine, but is convinced that science will at one point decipher everything... The other side is that precisely science itself is now regaining an insight as to its limits, that many scientists today are saying: «Doesn't everything have to come from somewhere?»

The Christian indeed has always recognised the immediate primacy of secondary causes in the bringing about of natural phenomena, but as serial causes have been traced further back, and their astonishing inter-dependence demonstrated, the scientist has tended to proclaim either a mathematical universe in which theses secondary causes may be identified with some primary basic formula, or equation, synonymous in definition with a physical ultimate, a universe inwhich God has no place; or else he has preferred to identify intellect with matter itself and has come to accept that idealistic cosmic pantheism which is almost as common a philosophy today as evolutionary materialism.

You wise Scientist — Can you please scientifically explain to me where did the stuff came from that caused the «BIG BANG» — if you can not do that your so called science are based on a belief and not on facts as you so eagerly would like to promote — so — then your view is also based on faith and not science, because science should be able to observed and tested, but faith must be taken and believed.

Not what u see on CNN, not what your mum said nor your pastor or priest said and not what u see some Muslims neighbors of yours do... noooo nay,,, what have u searched your self... i dare u do... find the true, i swear nothing makes any sense as Islam does, those guys know the whole truth... even if it will hurt, just like Santa - clause when u 12 year or the rats that gives money to the de toothing kid in our Ugandan myth, u deserve to know the truth... and if no scientist has come out and disproved the divine origin of this universe logically then there must be a mighty some one behind it and that Creator or whatever it is, HE has a way, a straight path to Him and we are obliged to know it... so my adverse to u is look hard for the true coz it is clear from false, even if u may hate it!!

@ steve, I could also get into some of the «higher brain functions» that lead scientists to better understand why we have compassion and such; however, I think that many people don't really give compassion or morals a lot of thought or care as to where they come from, they are simply a part of who we are as a species.

Collins puts it well: «When you look from the perspective of a scientist at the universe, it looks as if it knew we were coming.

Apparently there are two thoughts as to how devistation will come to us in the near future: Apocalyptic disaster brought forth by the grace of God, or climate data which has been continually compiled and interpreted by climate scientists since the 1960s.

Maybe it will actually come from scientists, and we can examine, test, investigate and evaluate it in terms that we can accept as factual and true.

Sagan, as with every scientist that ever lived or will live can never explain «where it all came from».

She does not tell us whether she has come to identify fully with this version of Christianity, but she makes clear that in this book she writes as a social scientist who in this role can not make statements about the ultimate validity of the Evangelical experience of God.

True though this is, many of the possibilities Kass foresees may come about inadvertently, not as the result of arrogant scientists and their shills engaged in creating a posthuman future.

Even when the consensus came to be as I described it above, some scientists continued their reflections.

The Scholastics took the «beyond - mental», that is objective, world seriously, as docontemporary empirical scientists, and for the Scholastics, real knowledge comes by way of essence.

These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?

I suspected when I first heard this claim that the Committee on the Status of Black Americans, loaded as it was with social scientists, had demolished a straw man, a bloodless construct so rigidly defined as to be meaningless in terms of the actual lives of the humans who inhabit the nation's ghettos and who, for the most part, make up what has come to be called the underclass.

I think Carl Jung came up with some good ways of thinking about our cultural images and how they come about — that scientists many hundreds or thousands of years later might have the same sorts of cultural images informing their intuitions, and thus using those images as the basis for a theory of evolution is not so much extraordinary than it is to be expected.

Einstein agreed with his math, was appalled at Lemaitre's physics, but being the scientist, came around to his physics as the evidence came in.

Even now, we are at the point in history where there are not nearly enough scientists to answer the more and more questions that come up... As Solomon said:

Gestation crates, used throughout Tyson Foods» supply chain, have come under fire by McDonald's, Burger King, Wendy's, Costco, Safeway, Kroger, Oscar Mayer, Jimmy Dean, Sysco and other nearly 50 other leading food companies, as well as from veterinarians, farmers, animal welfare advocates, scientists, consumers and others.

However, as always, it may be expected that the scientists will come up with an answer.

After years of studies and conducting several experiments, the scientists have come to a conclusion that sugar can not be responsible for causing hyperactivity in children as there is no credible proof available to back this notion.

Early adversity, scientists have come to understand, can not only affect the conditions of children's lives, it can alter the physical development of their brains as well.

Following the example of other distinguished political scientists such as Azar Gat and Francis Fukuyama [2], Brown even extends the analysis of leadership back to pre-historic times analysing its emergence in earlier forms of social organization such as egalitarian hunter - gatherer societies noting that with increased community size came the rise of authoritarian chiefdoms, arguably the first true political leaders (pp. 40 - 2).

I'm just back from traveling through Texas and Louisiana, and it's always great to come home to an article as full of fun as this one: New Scientist reports from an e-crime summit in Pittsburg that in the coming years, «voters will increasingly be targeted by internet - based dirty tricks campaigns, and that the perpetrators will find it easier to cover their tracks.»

I'm just back from traveling through Texas and Louisiana, and it's always great to come home to an article as full of fun as this one: New Scientist reports from an e-crime summit in Pittsburg that in the coming years, «voters will increasingly be targeted by internet - based...

As a data scientist, I come across people's irrationality all the time.

The call to relax the rules on GM crops from Sir Mark Walport, government chief scientist, comes as no surprise.

I was elected in 2014 in a by - election and came into Parliament after a long career in the NHS as a healthcare scientist.

Paruch, 37, came back to his former department at Masaryk University as an assistant professor in January 2009, this time with an Alfred Bader Fellowship aimed at supporting returning Czech scientists.