A bulk of the debt — $ 47.2 billion —
comes from public authorities.
Not exact matches
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his
authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements
coming in...
from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a
public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
Exhibitors and participants at SciFest
come from schools and universities as well as companies,
public authorities, museums and organisations.
Before a single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will
come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school
authorities statewide; The Department of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions
from the
public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge
public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified of the impending disclosure of their children's data, and provide them with a right to consent or have the right to withhold their children's information
from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest of
public school children and their families are put above the interests of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.
The bill seeks to preserves state
authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing on
public lands — a right that has recently
come under assault
from the federal government.
And tell us all we are the ignorant unwashed, lazy
public who must
coming running to you to be granted crumbs of scientific
authority from the table of Dr William M Connolley.
Yet, the professions have
come under attack
from dual fronts:
from government, which often fails to consider professional expertise in relevant policy areas; and
from the general
public, which has
come to view professionals suspiciously in an era of declining deference to
authority.
«Having considered the decisions, the writings and the various aspects of the
public interest which claim attention, I have
come to the conclusion that the court should state the relevant principle as follows: a document which was produced or brought into existence either with the dominant purpose of its author, or of the person or
authority under whose direction, whether particular or general, it was produced or brought into existence, of using it or its contents in order to obtain legal advice or to conduct or aid in the conduct of litigation, at the time of its production in reasonable prospect, should be privileged and excluded
from inspection.»