Sentences with phrase «comes the debate about»

«Out of the consideration of home really comes the debate about nationality, belonging, race, power, patriarchy and the ownership of space, and these bigger ideas inform the everyday social context,» says Essers.

Southern California Edison (SCE) Director of Energy Policy Gary Stern sees the coming debate about NEM as involving that question.

Not exact matches

Trump responded by going into attack mode, including making a now - famous controversial remark about Kelly having «blood coming out of her wherever» during the debate.

Many people argue about what needs to come first in order to create an entrepreneurial community — ideas or capital — but it's a chicken - and - egg debate, says Brad Whitehead, president of the Fund For Our Economic Future, a program that pools funding for entrepreneurs from various philanthropic organizations across Northeast Ohio.

While researching a client proposal recently, I came across an intriguing debate about a legendary marketer.

The announcement came on the same day two television journalists were shot and killed in Virginia in an incident that is likely to stoke the debate about gun ownership in the United States.

The CMA's ruling comes amid a growing debate on both sides of the Atlantic about the ethics of price hikes for old off - patent medicines that are only made by a few firms and where there is little competition.

That event, known as a «hard fork,» is viewed as increasingly likely among bitcoin leaders, as a years - long debate about the network's technical limitations and broader vision comes to a head.

It has quality assets here in Texas, quality assets in the U.S., and with the recent news coming from the Russian Parliament that they may cut off uranium and titanium exports to the U.S., it is actually going to be debating this on May 15, the stock has been up about 20 or 30 % in the last few days, in large part because of the safety that the assets provide jurisdiction wise.

When we come back, we're going to get into the future of the gun violence debate and talk about those Russia indictments with the panel.

Fishon you make sense and I get where you are coming from on this issue — I held your exact same views for at least 10 years... I even debated gay people about it being a «choice».

The biggest embarrassment came when we discovered that sections of the extended intervention into the French debate about gay marriage and adoption by Grand Rabbi of France Giles Bernheim, «Homosexual Marriage, Parenting, and Adoption,» were plagiarized.

Thats why anger shouldn't be our default, especially when it comes to trivial arguments on social media and debates about news stories that don't even effect us directly.

While he allows that doctrinal debates about Christ and the Trinity are of only antiquarian interest, he comes out for what he calls a «redemptive process» in which good people do not give up on the goal of establishing the kingdom of God on earth.

It is a book that will spur creative debate about critical familism for years to come.

Today much of our debate about marriage comes from a similar hope to score political points.

This is not the place to get into a debate about the tribulation so all I will say is at least be open to the possibility that Jesus was warning the Church to ready for persecution and be therefore prepared to endure to the end in the face of whatever might come.

My comments about whiny christians, laptop dogooders, etc... comes from the many negative comments my husband has towards tv evangilism, religious debates that he has listened to, articles in newspapers, & obviously his / our personal experiences.

Write an article that panders even a bit to religionists, and they come out in droves yapping about how the sky fairy wants us to do good works, and then debating their various versions of mythology.

They debated how that change might come about.

Everything flows from the opening sentence of the book, an expansion of a 2010 article from the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy: «What we have come to call the gay marriage debate is not directly about homosexuality, but about marriage.»

It ought to come as a surprise to no one, therefore, that from the time of the first splitting of the atom down through the destruction of Hiroshima and on to current controversies about nuclear weapons and power plants, Christian people have been involved individually and corporately at every level of the debate, not incidentally but specifically because of their Christian commitment.

These are some of many subjects that competent and well respected scholars continue to debate and vigourously disagree on.That is the nature of the animal we call theology... if everything we come to believe about the Christian faith is a product of infallible indisputable revelation, then the case is closed.

but on the third day using his Power of Resurrection rose from the dead to claim his seat next to God in heaven, I mean next to himself since he was also God and then told the masses that he died for their sins, though oddly enough being God he could have simply absolved them of their sins and he really didn't die because he lives and is coming back to judge man based upon the original sins... but not sure if that would work since man can clearly kill a God with wood and nails... I know, I know confusing and likely to be labeled heresy... but debates about nomenclature and religion... i mean story telling... just don't mix.

I find fewer and fewer people really care about this debate, but at the same time, I find more and more people who have a «default» view of God which comes from Calvinism.

Also, I read a lot of debate about whether Jesus actually did come and «clear things up» with the Matthew 5:17 - 18.

Due to the shear number of planets, of course one has to have the perfect conditions to support life, which (over billions of years of EVOLUTION) has perfected all of those systems to the point where we can debate about where it all came from.

As Cosmos continues to turn heads and give this country a (much needed) renewed interest in science, the old debate about science and religion has come back to the forefront...

In fact, they debated about coming home because it seemed the grandmother might not live more than a day or two.

This came about by reading someone saying what the pharasees said, and I brought it up as a kind of conversation / debate..

He answered a question about how his religion would affect his presidency at Thursday's CNN debate by talking about the Founding Fathers» belief that rights came from God, as opposed to talking about his Mormonism.

Despite the fact that the debate over female ordination will continue, it seems that evangelicals on different sides of that debate could come together about the role of women in para-church organizations.

He was saying, «Look, while you come up with your three simple steps to deciding whether you can heal on the Sabbath or not, here is a real, live human being who is hurting and in need of your help, and all you can do is sit there and debate about him like he was a log blocking the road.

CNN: My Take: Hard truths matter; I'm Mormon, and I'm voting for Obama There are two moments and two moments only that made my soul sit upright during Tuesday night's presidential debate: President Obama, speaking about the loss of manufacturing jobs to low - wage economies like China: «There are some jobs that are not coming back.»

Coming after half a millennia since the reformation, the robot is once again set to cause a debate about the role of the church and what the future holds for it.

As I debated with a Muslim about the Bible and Jesus, I was soon surrounded by a large group firing probing questions at me, coming quicker than I could answer them.

I find it quite interesting in the current debate about waterboarding and «enhanced interrogation techniques» that many of the same people who are condemning the practice of waterboarding as a means to learn information about what our nation's enemies are planning, are the same people who, after 9 - 11, demanded to know why our nation's intelligence did not know that the 9 - 11 terrorist attack was coming.

While there has already been gallons of ink devoted to the political debate regarding gun control (and there will likely be gallons more to come) the broader issue for believers is how exactly Christians should talk about the issue of gun control.

This reasonable and thoughtful critique of the administration came on the heels of some of the President's comments about his grandmother during last night's debates.

We come to debate narrow political topics and leave knowing more than we did, not only about the issues, but about those with whom we are arguing and about the world we share.

WHERE IS THE LOVE OF GOD IN ALL THIS??? This is an open forum, an invitation to debate... it isn't a place for name calling, or put downs... it isn't a place for closed mindedness... its a place to exchange ideas, and perhaps to come to a greater understanding of scripture and one another and when someone puts someone down or is dogmatic about another's beliefs it prevents dialogue.

«s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

Coco «s internal debate over this sets up a fascinating conversation about the balance between personal ambition and responsibility to others that I don't believe a lot of parents will see coming after watching the film with their children.

In a few circles of the Presbyterian Church of New Zealand, there was strong concern expressed about the orthodoxy of an article on «The Resurrection,» and as soon as this came to the notice of the press, the debate left the confines of Presbyterian Church circles and became a public issue.

One of the insidiously damaging aspects of the present debate about the divorced and remarried is the failure to say anything about the proper dispositions required for a non-sacrilegious communion, and the general acquiescence in everyone coming up to receive the Eucharist regardless of their state of life, state of soul, or faith in the real presence.

As I thought about how to apply these teachings practically, a lot of strategies came to mind — putting the needs of others before my own, buying less and giving more, humbling myself when engaged in political or theological debates, embracing rather than complaining about those «one - way relationships,» praying for others more sincerely, saying «yes» a little more often, working on that ubiquitous sense of entitlement and pride that keeps me from going the extra mile.

Out of this came a lot of debate about original sin, the evil of human nature, and all the mental gymnastics to sustain that stuff.

When push comes to shove, is this debate really about the symbolic denigration of a religious practice, or is the worry that once some parents find out about the risks, they'll reject received dogma and discard the practice?

Scholars still debate the extent to which Jesus shared these apocalyptic beliefs and intended his teaching about the coming Kingdom of God to be interpreted in their light.

Come on people, with all the cr @p going on in the world, even if there was a god you really think he'd care about a debate or an election in the US?