Sentences with phrase «comes to a point further»

Not exact matches

Bell of GeoDynamics points out that if a corporate incubator agrees to give you funding to help you further your idea, it comes at a cost, whether it is equity, control or something else.

However, the American housing market will bounce back at some point, and compared to other sectors, this one comes with far less risk.

The focus on the tax plan comes just three days before the President's 100th day in office, a point - in - time measurement Trump has called «ridiculous» despite sending his administration officials into overdrive to promote the work he has done so far.

But a total repeal of Obamacare, at least in the near term, is much easier said than done, and full replacement with new comprehensive legislation seems highly unlikely at this point in time, given that 60 Senate votes will be needed to do so, and Democrats and Republicans appear as far apart as ever in coming to a consensus on a bipartisan strategy to move forward.

But there were two points that came up in the show that I wanted to further amplify, including an important fact check.

The fluidity of the market points to further consolidation to come.

To further cement his point, Heitkoetter sarcastically comes up with his own pseudo tutorial on how to trade cryptocurrencies on his videTo further cement his point, Heitkoetter sarcastically comes up with his own pseudo tutorial on how to trade cryptocurrencies on his videto trade cryptocurrencies on his video.

Children of Israel, Hearken to the voice of David above, and go and find his long awaited and anticipated Descendant in that DESERT (that is FAR AWAY from Israel now) if you want to protect yourself from that raging Wind and Storm that is coming upon Israel and all that Region, as David thus clearly pointed out above.

If Jesus is supposed to die a some point further along in his life, then Judas has come in and altered God's plans.

You are so far off the mark not able to come to understanding and from this point not worth replying to goodbye

The irrelevant ones come when the editors are stretching too far to make a point, something that happens especially in the gospels, presumably from a desire to enlist Jesus in the cause.

As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?

Further Voobus points out that it was neither the Greek Old Testament which became scriptural authority for Hellenistic Christianity nor the Hebrew original text which was translated into Syriac but the scriptures of the Palestinian synagogue, namely, the ancient Palestinian Targumim which came to be used among the Jewish Christians.

They point out that when one natural resource is exhausted, technology comes up with ways to use the scarce resources far more efficiently.

But while Paul's testimony is, historically speaking, of first - class value, when it comes to the question of the story of the empty tomb and the physical nature of the resurrection, his words, far from bringing firm confirmation of the «bodily resurrection», are open to a variety of interpretations, and, on the whole, point to quite a different view of resurrection.

We must come to acknowledge that judgment is not something to be thought of exclusively, or even primarily, at some far - off end point in the future.

If at this point in the central tragedy in our history there had occurred the demonstration of the power and glory of the God in whom he trusted; if Elijah had come; if he who saved others had been saved; if we know not what natural or supernatural event had taken place to deliver this soul of faith from death and further shame; then might not faith as universal loyalty and universal trust have been reconstructed among men?

Before going on to speak of the convergence that exists on this point between the present General Secretary of the World Council of Churches and the Encyclical Ut unum sint, I must first take the further step of showing that the suggestion about dialogue and reception as phases of a conciliar process has not come out of the blue.

I have come to a point that it makes no sense to keep trying to rehabilitate Christianity to reflect some type of humanity when simply going directly to the truth is far simpler.

For belief and coming into existence correspond to one another, and are concerned with the two negative determinations of being, namely the past and the future, and with the present in so far as it is conceived from the point of view of a negative determination of being, namely as having come into existence.

So did Paul, who comes to a point in his Epistle to the Romans when he realizes he can not go any further.

In recent years, though, Hawking has come closer to Gödel's point of view, going so far as to conjecture that a sort of Gödelian «incompleteness principle» might exist in physics as well as in mathematics.

While you may have a point here and I agree the information should have come out sooner to the masses, most right - wing networks would have, as they have proven they will, continued to bash the Muslim community and the Islamic faith, furthering the anti-Islam propaganda that is already rampant in this country.

Yet there comes the point when we can't strive intellectually any further, and we have to be content with trusting that somehow, somewhere, there is a level where it all makes sense.

It shouldn't have taken us 20 years to reach this point (and it wouldn't have, if the energy lobby hadn't poisoned the waters of public debate with bogus research), but it's cause for celebration that we've come this far.

Aaaaand here comes HS to further prove the point that right - wing - nuts and fundies fully intend to remove rights that are guaranteed to us by law.

The chief point to note about these two motives, the motive of liberation and the motive of survival, is that they can suddenly come to an end, so far as their effectiveness is concerned.

But soon he came to a point where he could not proceed any further.

We've come too far at this point to not have a picture - perfect dish!

My life is far from glamorous as is evident from the new - mom bags under my eyes, my postpartum tummy, my messy house and how ridiculous I look while exercising but when it comes down to it that is the point right?

Gordon is fifth, a whopping 394 points behind Jarrett, and a driver hasn't come from that far back at the halfway point to win the title since Richard Petty in 1972.

That sums it up chelsea far superior on paper and it showed during the game there's no point in crying over it to much as it was an obvious defeat coming.

The inexplicable losses to Stoke, Southampton and Swansea come to mind Moreover we didn't beat a single top 5 opponent at home which further drives home the point.

We are far more likely to slip up than them and come the end of the season that 12 point gap could easily be in the 20s.

On the morning after Stephen Curry's 54 - point outburst in Madison Square Garden, we remember just how far he fell in the 2009 NBA Draft and just how close he came to becoming a Knick.

So no, I don't think anybody would be all that giddy to see an announcement that he's coming to UF (and as I type this I just found out he transferred to Charlotte, which further illustrates my point).

To be dominated on the glass like that to start the game, when that was the biggest point of emphasis by far coming in... they were destroying us on the glasTo be dominated on the glass like that to start the game, when that was the biggest point of emphasis by far coming in... they were destroying us on the glasto start the game, when that was the biggest point of emphasis by far coming in... they were destroying us on the glass.

2 points dropped, 2 further players lost to injury, Arsenal are definitely on a low when it comes to there performance.

Alvarez is so proud of how far Maura has come, and how much his parents have sacrificed for him to get to this point, whether or not the dream continues on Sunday.

Now that injuries have exposed our dire CB situation, and games against the likes of Chelsea (who are on fire with 9 point gap above us and with a balanced team at that) have shown how weak our midfield core is, I have to come to see that we are still a bit far from winning the league.

why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

He cost us the points at Southampton and far too many times has he been too static when shots come to our goal.

Arsenal face the long haul up to Newcastle to face a team without a League win so far this season, but the Gunners are still under pressure to come away with all three points to try and keep in touch at the top end of the table.

If he plays, and that is far from certain, he would definitely be an outsider, although Laurent Koscielny scored the opener in the early season game against Palace at the Emirates, where we had to come from behind to snatch the points in the 90th minute.

While our away form so far this season has not been great, the Emirates Stadium is feeling something like a fortress and the last time we even dropped points there was back at the beginning of April when Man City came to town.

But so far, we've got to a point where you really can't believe anything that comes out of his mouth.

We must learn from our mistakes but it's a shame with the way we are reacting.How many of you would put your money on AC Milan beating Bayern in the UCL if they lost 6 - 0 today.As far as am concerned from a neutral point of view I expected both Bayern and Chelsea to beat Arsenal.It's shocking our defeat has come as shock.Players are being played out of position and the teams we've played used far more stronger squads.

At what point, when speaking about the pain blackness endures, will it come time to take another step further?

In turn, it's no surprise that Galliani has no interest in discussing a possible exit for the shot - stopper, as he evidently has a major role to play in the club's progress in the years to come with Montella's side exceeding expectations so far this season as they sit just two points adrift of Serie A leaders Juventus.