Not exact matches
On Thursday, the Ninth Circuit denied the government's emergency appeal to lift the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on Trump's immigration order issued last week by a federal judge in Seattle, indicating in its opinion that Trump's past
comments about a «Muslim ban» can be used as
evidence for discrimination.
In a
comment on his own post, MacMillan said he had since been in contact with a couple of Facebook staffers
about the incident, and both said they could find no record of the image or post having been taken down, and in fact couldn't find any
evidence that anything of that nature had ever been uploaded.
What is most uncomfortable
about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out
comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical
evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.
Reading some of the ignorant
comments on here
about science does make it hard to accept evolution, because so many
comments here don't
evidence evolution.
I counted over 20 assumptions in your
comment — all opinion,
about facts none being back up with factual
evidence.
(Bloom's frequent
comments about the religion - making character of the American imagination, our «religion - madness» is a service to the academy which so readily overlooks or dismisses
evidences of religion.)
Two
comments about this third point: First, the statement of this requirement is
evidence that neither the concept of God in general nor the conception of the consequent nature of God is ad hoc to Whitehead's system.
Carefully itemizing mercantile bills of sale, inventories of militia and volunteer detachments, the
evidence that there was a lack of gun - smiths, records of importation of guns from Europe, the incidence of duels (three in the entire South in the 1760s, none fatal), children's books and toys,
comments by eyewitnesses
about the abysmal shooting ability of settlers (lacking both the weapons and the gunpowder to practice), court records, and a wide variety of other historiographical resources, the author assembles an overwhelming mass of data to show that military prowess was not, in fact, characteristic of early Americans.
I would add to the mix those who are critical, often based on no
evidence or hearsay, of for example the Toronto blessing and the current Todd Bentley Lakeland outpouring I have written quite a lot
about this, and have been amazed by the negativity of so many of the
comments I have received.
I just thought that I'd add
evidence to my earlier
comment about Van Persie being fouled in the box at the end of the first half, and Sky playing their usual dirty tricks by not showing a replay of it.
The lack of Champions League or Europa League duties mean that the fringe players need game time, as
evidenced by Kurt Zouma's recent
comments about possibly leaving the club.
It is my hope that as a result of segments like the one on 20/20 and the fact that more women are feeling comfortable speaking out
about long - term nursing (as
evidenced by all of the
comments and Tweets I received), that others will not feel like they need to be «closet nursers» nor feel pressured by family, friends or society in general to wean before they feel it is right for them and their child.
Dial maintains she also has
evidence that Hammond meant the
comment to be
about her.
Comments about the hostile response to any request for home birth confirm the anecdotal reports of consumer groups such as the Association for the Improvement in Maternity Services and the National Childbirth Trust and
evidence to the Expert Maternity Group.1 In addition, many women who had booked a home birth were later transferred to hospital for delivery, both before and after the onset of labour.
You're fastidious
about using products and herbs with lots of
evidence to support them, and then manage to make a
comment like «she probably works for the company she's promoting»??
If you say that obgyns do not practice
evidence based medicine, and then in your next
comment you mention recommending pregnant women take homeopathic remedies to get a breech baby to turn, you have just shown that you have no idea what you are talking
about when it comes to what
evidence is.
An FDA spokesman had no immediate
comment but noted that a review of existing
evidence about BPA's health effects is nearly complete and that the agency will «make a decision how to proceed» by month's end.
The Tories, having looked for an angle to hit back at Miliband, linked his union
comments, the pasty incident, and Westminster tittle - tattle
about his alleged arrogance and indifference to more junior members as
evidence of elitism and snobbery.
In fifth place this week is an article which pointed towards
comments made by Alex Salmond
about banning «all Donald Trumps» from Scotland and the passing of a law which could see football fans questioned and arrested just for the clothes they are wearing, as
evidence that Scotland is drifting towards authoritarianism under the SNP.
Second, OHS promulgated this rule without providing notice or the opportunity to
comment as required by the Administrative Procedure Act («APA»), thereby depriving Plaintiff States of the opportunity to present important
evidence to OHS
about the overwhelming success of the DACA program in Plaintiff States as part of the rulemaking process.
The
comments, which echo criticisms of Mr Brown from his opponents, are certain to be presented by Opposition parties as
evidence of what the Business Secretary «really thinks»
about the Prime Minister.
Commenting on the new report that provides documented
evidence of how the alcohol industry is misleading the public
about the risks associated with alcohol and cancer, Institute of Alcohol Studies Chief Executive Katherine Brown said: «This report shows that, like the tobacco industry before them, alcohol companies are misleading consumers
about the
evidence linking their products to cancer.
Is there any
evidence of pre-booked TV studios or as with the
comments about expelling the Scottish Labour Party, do we need to take it that
evidence of the allegation is irrelevant and we simply go into fantasy land?
Further, rather than
comment in an insulting, arrogant way, how
about stating simply your view and offering specific
evidence that makes it so iron - clad?
In a 2011 court case in the USA
about school funding the Judge
commented on Hanusheck's
evidence submitted to that trial:
Commenting on the report, David Laws, chairman of EPI, said: «For too long the debate
about «academisation», the possible roles for local authorities in school improvement, and the impact of structural reform on our school system has been dominated by political ideologies, half - truths and hunches, rather than by
evidence and careful analysis.
From the observations, we searched for
comments about children's engagement, which for us embraced both compliance (on - task behavior, in which children are productively engaged in their assigned activity) and involvement (
evidence of genuine student enthusiasm for the activities).
Since I have been adding a lot of posts and
comments to the Community lately, I thought it might be nice to tell you a little more
about my background and my team's efforts to promote integrated,
evidence - based social - emotional learning in Milwaukee Public Schools.
Laura
commented about how I need to write more
about SLOs as states are increasingly adopting these, but states are doing this without really any research
evidence in support of the concept, much less the practice.
That means that everyone who is an eligible publisher now probably had to recertify in 2007 (my «probably» indicates that I don't have direct
evidence, and this is conjecture) and so any worries
about people becoming eligible and just staying on the list without
comment or question are probably fruitless.
(I have no idea what he is talking
about, but
comments like this offer more
evidence that the boom times in self - publishing are over.
This contributes to a toxic environment in which it's hard to get to the core of the problem, as
evidenced by
comments on this page that talk
about «dumb Americans», «US is so behind in many many ways, they need to catch up», etc...
What is most uncomfortable
about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out
comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical
evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.
However, I can offer a few clues, based on statements that Shiller himself has made and on behavior I have seen from others who believe that valuations matter and who have
evidenced a great reluctance to offer public
comments about what this means in practical terms for investors.
Numerous noted experts in the field have
commented about the hereditary nature of HD, adding tons to the weight of
evidence.
She
comments that, «gazing steadily at the point at which one element meets another, Terrain asks us to think
about these imprints left by the material processes of work as the
evidence of our presence on the earth, and to think
about how contemporary human beings, living in a western urban environment, can relate to the metaphysics of the labor which enables our lives.»
Your
comments about RealClimate's motives and your suggestion that they are driven by «convictions» rather than good science indicate you are too lazy to engage them in a debate based on science and
evidence.
PS; Barack Hussein Obama's
comment about having taken foreign - diplomacy - studies in college as
evidence of experience is just plain laughable.
From the context it is clear that you are arguing that more CO2 leads to higher temperatures (you answered my earlier
comment that I could find no
evidence that CO2 affected temperaturee in near term; I said nothing
about a lack of correlation).
# 277 Phil Scadden: «I was considering whether I had time or energy to
comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based
evidence making» is
about.
In terms of the
comments about the Holocene record, etc, and Gavin's saying that there is «no
evidence» of such methane burps then: first, let us all also acknowledge that some of the world's major paleoclimate and methane experts HAVE seen
evidence of exactly that [i.e., Nisbet, Have sudden large releases of methane from geological reservoirs occurred since the Last Glacial Maximum, and could such releases occur again?
I was considering whether I had time or energy to
comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based
evidence making» is
about.
[Re: # 277: I was considering whether I had time or energy to
comment, but wondered if anyone knew who Steven Goddard is and what the «policy based
evidence making» is
about.
Aspects of his
comment may be unwelcome to just
about everyone in one way or another, but I think it is worth noting that he says that the data issues don't detract from clear
evidence of a long - term warming trend and that carbon dioxide is «a major climate forcing» (along with many others):
His
comments here and elsewhere over time make clear that his skepticism is informed not by his command of the
evidence and of the scientific method as it is practiced by actual scientists, but by his disdain for «orthodoxy» and his resentment at being told he doesn't know what he's talking
about.
I am going to repeat a
comment I made in earlier thread as it seems more germane here and provides additional
evidence about the reluctance of climate scientist to speak freely.
Willis (and Terje) I pointed to the
evidence about 300
comments ago.
2) Gavin's parting
comment about «other lines of
evidence» being consistent with Marvel et al is hollow.
Your
comment about blaming CO2 because it is «easier» is ridiculous given the 100 history of GH theory and al the mountains of
evidence we now have.
I don't see so far any
comments about the CERN cosmic ray - cloud formation
evidence / confirmation and the effect of lower clouds and their cooling effect.