Sentences with phrase «comment on climate skeptic»

The hacker then placed a brief comment on a more obscure climate skeptic site called the Air Vent maintained by Patrick Condon (aka Jeff «Id») and a long comment on Climate Skeptic identical to the WUWT comment, both linking to the Russian FTP site.

Not exact matches

1) I have no comment on the general extent of pal review, but for sure, the Climate Research / de Freitas case covered by SkS was pal review (I wrote the report that's based on, i.e., Skeptics Prefer Pal Review Over Peer Review: Chris de Freitas, Pat Michaels And Their Pals, 1997 - 2003.

Richard Betts, the head of the climate impacts section of Britain's Met Office, recently left a comment on the «skeptic» * blog Bishop Hill stating that thresholds for climate danger, such as the much ballyhooed 2 - degree limit enshrined in recent climate pledges, were not determined by science:

1) I have no comment on the general extent of pal review, but for sure, the Climate Research / de Freitas case covered by SkS was pal review (I wrote the report that's based on, i.e., Skeptics Prefer Pal Review Over Peer Review: Chris de Freitas, Pat Michaels And Their Pals, 1997 - 2003.

I've read the climate sensitivity papers written by Stephen Schwartz, who is taken to be a skeptic by many who comment on this blog.

The hacker proceeded to comment on other, lesser - known climate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate Sclimate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate Sskeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate SClimate SkepticSkeptic.

Based on the number of comments that day and the average readership of the skeptic blogs, they had an army poring over the files in a race to find the next «juicy» comment from the climate scientists.

«In June 2009, former Clinton Administration official Joe Romm defended a comment on his Climate Progress website warning skeptics would be strangled in their beds.

A lot of comment this week on the new video about Jerry Taylor, formerly a reliable climate «skeptic» voice on Fox News and elsewhere — who turned completely when he actually started looking at the data with an open mind.

«The language of denial: Text analysis reveals differences in language use between climate change proponents and skeptics» «Comment on «Climate Science and the Uncertainty Monster» by J. A. Curry and P. J. Webster» «Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertaintiesclimate change proponents and skeptics» «Comment on «Climate Science and the Uncertainty Monster» by J. A. Curry and P. J. Webster» «Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertaintiesClimate Science and the Uncertainty Monster» by J. A. Curry and P. J. Webster» «Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertainties»

Posted in Media and the Public, tagged antarctica, climate change, credibility, debate, denial, education, environment, global warming, greenhouse effect, greenland, IPCC, lindzen, media, michaels, politics, s. fred singer, science, skeptic, skeptical science on August 4, 2011 13 Comments»

The reason why I stopped posting on the topic is because apparently, unlike as we see in the comments of numerous «skeptics» mocking the tribalism of climate scientists, Judith objects to my mocking criticism of a prominent «skeptical» scientist's blatant tribalism (comparing an environmental ethos to eugenics).

â $ œAfter reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.â $ — Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review. Â

Would it include the vast majority of «skeptics» who write comments on this blog about «climate change?»

As part of our contribution, CSW commented that the document might carry greater relevance for decision - makers who want to advance a needed adaptation agenda to an unconvinced or climate - skeptic audience (a very real possibility) by including more explicit language on the ways in which climate change issues can be framed to appeal to diverse groups — for example, emphasizing the potential damages to people and property to one community, the negative impacts to industry in another.

There is still plenty to argue about, as this comment list demonstrates, but as far as policy goes, someone should tell the policy makers the good news that the reasonable climate skeptics are now on side.

What I wanted to comment on was your question about «the integrity of the skeptics «climate theory»».

I am working on a blog post called How to Talk to a Conservative about Climate Change and would enjoy your comments to make this a better tool to use when faced with a conservative - leaning skeptic.

Let be honest here, I want to comment on this line ««While climate skeptics gain traction in the media and with policy makers — drawing endless attention to trivial errors (such as an AR4 typo on Himalayan glaciers)»... ok now, who believes this was a typo, no one.

Don't comment too much because it is not worth it, but I want to be prepared when the climate skeptics come after our work on the much more important topic of oil depletion.

Here are further thoughts from Richard Courtney, with my comments, posted on climate skeptics: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/message/44900