He might climb into the pulpit to
comment on Scripture readings.
Teaching in this context is primarily to
comment on Scripture.
Not exact matches
There were many great
comments from the series
on the Inspiration of
Scripture.
I would say to any person
commenting on your 10 Ways the Non-Violent Atonement Changes Your Theology blog, to read your book first (its not an expensive purchase) before launching into any detailed discussion or disagreement.It answers many of the potential concerns people have and gets the reader to reflect very strongly
on what they have been taught about the atonement and to put
on a new set of glasses when reading
scripture.
Take 10 minutes from patting yourself
on the back and take a look at my blog / websites, and / or my
comments on other threads here, and you'll be quickly disabused of the notion that I treat the
Scriptures «as though they are written directly to 20th Century A.D. Americans» (For what it's worth, I'm not American, so why would I do such a thing).
People sometimes leave
comments on my blog about prophecy, and almost without fail, these
comments are thousands of words long, full of
Scripture quotations and links to current events about Obama, Putin, Area 51, and chem trails.
Your
comments suggest that you dismiss anyone with a different take
on at least this topic as just catering to their fleshly desires and not being sincere in their searching of
scripture or their desire to honestly follow God.
Salem Kirban was a biblical - prophecy guru who flourished in the 1970s — think of a minor - league Hal Lindsey — who produced a Bible in which every passage of
Scripture relating to the end times was highlighted, magnified,
commented on, and surrounded by illustrations.
Before closing the last thread
on bashing Calvinism, I noted this as one of the
comments: If it is contended that people go to Hell because God elects them to Hell, then I absolutely believe that Calvinism is antithetical to
Scripture because the Bible tells that God wants all to be saved, that Jesus....
there is actually lots of
scripture to speak to this subject... kind of doubting based
on some of your
comments that you have actaully read or cared to read about it
In this interview, Nicholas Lash speaks of God along with
comments on modalism, tritheism, the «end of religion,» Aquinas, Marxism, ecumenism, interpreting
scripture, methods of teaching, Joseph Ratzinger and post-Christian culture.
I enjoy how folks that have no real relationship with Jesus or the
scripture comment on what they do not understand.
Rather than being excited about some new insight from
Scripture or idea about theology which I get to pass
on to others, my writing has become more about pageviews, backlinks, ad revenue, email subscriber stats, book sales, and
comment counts.
Mark Twain was quick to
comment on the way
scripture was read in the churches of his day:
I find it interesting that the first thing I read that I wanted to
comment on was Dan's assertion that» «All
scripture» means «all
scripture.»»
Pius XII already
commented on the unitive significance of this powerful biblical expression: «In its natural structure, the conjugal act is a personal action, a simultaneous and immediate cooperation
on the part of the husband and wife, which by the very nature of the agents and the proper nature of the act is the expression of the mutual gift which, according to the words of
Scripture, brings about union «in one flesh»» (Address, October 29, 1951: AAS 3 (1951), 850).
In The Art of Biblical Narrative, Robert Alter suggests a key to characters» inner thoughts and motivations which would be helpful even to the inexperienced reader of
Scripture: first, external details (appearance, clothing, gestures); second, «one character's
comments on another»; third, «direct speech by the character»; fourth, «inward speech... quoted as interior monologue»; and fifth, «statements by the narrator about the attitudes and intentions of the personages» (pp.116 - 117).
In terms of your critique of my
comments on your communication with God, I think you are right about the problems with
Scripture (at least to a degree).
Then, in a
comment, I read that you had come up with six divisions based
on «major activities of God in
Scripture.»
Your
comments regarding your wild and exaggerated belief that God was somehow confused
on what he created in «Adam then Eve» as male and female and that the bible can be interpreted in any way you choose reminds me of some
scripture that you (being a scholar and former pastor?)
In it he claimed that the Pope is not above
Scripture, and
commented on the conventional papal interpretation of the reported words of Jesus to Peter «I will give you the keys of the kingdom...».
I'm a non-believer... (thank god)... but reading all these
comments on this religious nonsense is amazing... I get it when third world illiterates regurgitate the
scripture... but for the rest of humanity it's pure science fiction... can't beat it... it's a real money maker... let's take money and tax exemption out of the religious equation especially for the mega churches... and we'll see how long it lasts... anybody got a stop watch...
For those who offer opinions about what role they think God plays in such horible acts of violance, please support your
comments and opinions with
scriptures so the readers can also see for themselves what the Bible Really Teaches
on such questions and issues!.
In the horrific days and weeks which followed, this uninteresting
comment would take
on the role of Biblical
scripture, repeated throughout the legal process as proof that she was coming to the UK to work.