I must have missed
comment on this anomaly — if it is such — so would someone enlighten me, please?
Not exact matches
Your
comments on smaller sizing echo what Harlow said to me, so the fact I've had the opposite experience makes me think I've got an
anomaly.
Notes through August 21, 2005 covered the following topics: Two Posts Worth Reading Right Away, SWR Research Group Archives, Note
on Price Discipline, Guidelines Section, More about Monitoring Portfolio Safety, A Must Read for Mutual Fund Investors, New Current Research Section, A Good Idea for Dividend - Based Investing, Browse around, Scott Burns
Comments, The Rule of 25, Savings Rate Statistics, A Bond Tip, Be sure to keep up with our Current Research, More
on Threshold Distortion: Edited, Note
on the P / E10
anomaly.
But look it up — this foreign listing
anomaly is less
commented on, but it's a well - known phenomenon for oil & gas and gold stocks, for example.
If you were to read the
comments on You Tube clips for these pieces (a dangerous past - time, I know), you might notice a curious
anomaly in that the usual internet - haet is surprisingly sparse.
More importantly in the context of your
comment, the maximum positive meridional overturning streamfunction
anomalies are found to be almost precisely in phase with the maximum SSTs over the entire North Atlantic basin, including the tropical Atlantic and Carribean (see Figure 3 in the paper; SSTs shown
on the left side panel, associated meridional overturning streamfunction
anomalies shown
on the right side panel).
Given the standard deviation in the residuals (about 10 days), the 30 + day earlier ice out was a massive
anomaly (more than 3) and was noticed and
commented on at the time.
Lost in all the
comments on CO2 plant food and nitrate starvation (most important point of this blog is we should agree to cut all the mindless banter), Judith Curry said: «Focusing
on the «warmest year» is a pointless exercise, unless the warm
anomaly is as large as 1998.
To elaborate
on the question at the end of my above
comment — among all other considerations and obstacles, how practical would it be to go back over the past 100 + years and compute monthly
anomalies of globally averaged SST using spherical harmonic functions?
The rest of your
comment continued to express your concerns about the fact that the running total depends
on the ratio of positive to negative
anomalies.
In response to
comments by Bob, sky, & lgl: Some light can be shed
on this discussion of
anomalies & base years via 3 - D plotting (with month
on the y - axis and using color
on a z - axis).
In your most current
comment to me, you go
on to quote Nathan Mantua of JISAO, «Typical surface climate
anomaly patterns for warm phases of PDO are shown in Figure 1.
Neither of my
comments attempts to qualify things, nor even establish a relationship between the effects
on the weather and the
anomaly.
He first
commented to SG Zeke Hausfather says: May 10, 2014 at 3:08 pm at the SG post Me Vs. Hansen Vs. NOAA Posted
on May 10, 2014 Hi Steven, Your analysis would greatly benefit from using
anomalies rather than absolute temperatures, as everyone else working with temperature data does.
I had blogged here (http://tinyurl.com/ykfy8aa) that the GISS temperatures were computed from
anomalies, but your
comment on these pages that such a statement was «bull pucky» required me to dig further.
Since they then go
on to describe the miracles worked by the fantasy
anomaly (that is not the one the code does) I'm not going to bother
commenting on those bits... This
anomaly turns out to be well correlated across long distances — which serves as a check
on nearby stations and as a way to credibly fill in data poor regions.
, NHEM temp
anomaly would be in the vicinity of +0.25 rather than +.31 which still supports Afonzarelli
comment that «(the northern hemisphere is having a greater affect
on the global temperature
anomaly).»