Not exact matches
on
picking it to
pieces in the
comments.
Most times, I have seen some similar views, but they aren't usually the most bibically sound (mostly because they like to
pick bits and
pieces, just like how you
commented we can do.).
Funny enough, I think BF made the smartest
comment of all about this shopping service: I may have not
picked up some of these
pieces off the rack on my own, but once they were already in my house and I was free to try them on at my leisure, I didn't want to have to send them back!
Share your favorite
pieces in the
comments below and make sure to check out the other Bloggers Who Budget
picks!
That one
comment was a light bulb moment for me, because one of the other most often - quoted
pieces of writing advice is to
pick a person, real or imagined, who is your ideal reader, and write for them.
The
piece was
picked up in short order by Teleread and GalleyCat and garnered dozens of
comments.
[1] Although Longcore et al. seem eager to cite Churcher and Lawton's now - classic work as «evidence» of the damage cats can do, they make no mention of Churcher's later
comments (just one of many examples of their tendency to «cherry
pick» from the literature only the bits and
pieces that fit neatly into their argument).
I recently wrote a
piece about surfing in Bali and in the Facebook
comments somebody (quite rightly)
picked up on the fact that I'd failed to...
Using HadCRUT when BEST is demonstrably superior isn't per se «wrong» so much as indicative of poor judgement or possibly cherry
picking for an agenda; especially this is so when one has so many datasets available and instead of treating each one separately and distinctly and attempting to confirm one's hypothesis on just one of them at a time and
commenting on differences among them, one stitches together exactly the
pieces one can force into a persuasive but meaningless shape in what can only be viewed as a spoof of graphical analysis.