Sentences with phrase «comment threads back»

Not much learning to be had in comment threads back then, not compared to now.

Not exact matches

Looking back at the different comment threads on this article the usual banter has atheists and Christians exchanging angry and and mean comments at each other.
I haven't really commented on EC topics since I bowed out 6 - 7 years ago, but my sadness over what was lost when that community withered is all coming back to me having read this thread.
Take 10 minutes from patting yourself on the back and take a look at my blog / websites, and / or my comments on other threads here, and you'll be quickly disabused of the notion that I treat the Scriptures «as though they are written directly to 20th Century A.D. Americans» (For what it's worth, I'm not American, so why would I do such a thing).
Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
If we could go back to having them separate so I can see peoples comments post match, and not have to scrawl through the match thread comments, that would be great.
I commented on it well before that thread and only reason I posted it is he called me a liar about having money to back my bets up.
Instead of focusing on the assholes, go back and look through all the threads on your own forums where Eagles fans discussed strategy amicably and exchanged «good lucks,» or said «good game» after, or commented about how inappropriate some fans» behavior was, or who exhibited good sportsmanship, or who donated to Vikings» charitable causes.
Reading this comment stream makes me so sad — filled with people who long to use Peter's experience to cheat, to return to stuffing themselves with cake, to drinking... unless, like Peter you exercise an enormous amount (and while it's less than he used to, it's still way more than most people in this thread do), you'll gain all your weight and health problems back.
I don't know if I'll ever comment on MPL anymore; I feel that sometimes I might get enraged for stupid reasons and type in something unnecessary; my apologies if I have irritated anyone, especially SuperZambezi, he deserves more respect of his threads and I feel like I've been doing bad, see you guys; I may come back when this guilt wears off, maybe tomorrow if I feel better.
Interesting, I made a comment on this thread back in November of 2011.
NFB Mortgage Bonds vs Bond Funds Thread Additional Comments There probably is a place for Mortgage Back Securities in your retirement portfolio.
Go back and read my comments in the other thread.
I don't know if I'll ever comment on MPL anymore; I feel that sometimes I might get enraged for stupid reasons and type in something unnecessary; my apologies if I have irritated anyone, especially SuperZambezi, he deserves more respect of his threads and I feel like I've been doing bad, see you guys; I may come back when this guilt wears off, maybe tomorrow if I feel better.
Based on the comments on this thread, it seems like its ok for Sony to have 3rd exclusives, but back on E3 when MS announced Tomb Raider exclusive all hell broke loose (and for the record its just timed exclusive).
Go ahead and back at any reward tier and then post your suggestion in the comment thread.
So — going back to the bigger narrative of how your comment thread has been playing out — you grab one interpretation without thinking things through.
Looking back through Dan DaSilva's comment history, he was first active at RC as a simple troll, as in this a singleton comment lobbed into a comment thread from last year (on the subject of extreme weather under AGW, although that isn't probably relevant): -
I asked in the thread if he thought expectations about increases in forest fire size would be comparable; don't think the gentleman has been back to comment further.
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
There was a thread a while back where some people commented on where they fell out on a test that builds a kind of political matrix — I'm sure that very few of the «skeptics» found themselves scores as «leftist.»
I'm not saying he should have been quicker, but I can not check back on all comments in the thread every time I visit.
If you want to know what I am talking about, go back and read comments from the Welcome thread.
There is no attempt to claim precedence, but as far back as September 14th, I put a comment (# 3143) on the IJIS thread which contained the following text...
If you're as interested in the exchange between Jim and myself as you appear to be (by dint of your interjecting yourself into the dialogue), I suggest you go back to the previous Wagner thread and read up on our prior exchange on the topic related to my question in the above comment.
If you look back over some of my comments, on other threads and blogs, you will see I use all I can find.
Go back and read comment threads here on the Hay paper, which is now looking to be pretty good science.
If look look back over my comments on this thread, you will note that I repeatedly state that radiative gases can slow the cooling of land surface and by intercepting surface IR they can heat gases in the lower troposphere.
It turns out that Nic had an abridged version of his calculation back on the Quantifying Uncertainties thread some weeks ago, see his comment here.
Also the ongoing back and forth with Tom P keeps this thread current in Recent Comments and makes clicking on it easier.
In that thread, I posted a comment with an analogy of truckloads of orange juice, representing short - wave radiation from Sun to Earth, and truckloads of blueberry juice, representing longwave radiation between Earth and the Atmosphere and back out to Space.
As SoD has brought the thread back to the «back radiation», I wanted to comment on data from two of his references.
-- Comment in the Scientists» Comment Thread (SCT), «Fears of Freezing: The 1970s are calling; They want their climate policies back»
We'll be back on Monday, Jan. 4th, but in the meantime, whether you need a break from year - end collections or just the in - laws, please make yourselves comfortable in the comment section of this open thread.
Way back in April, I put up an «open thread» post seeking thoughts on best practices to deal with comment spam and the general notion of anonymity in blog comments.
The motions judge had done an excellent job of putting the insults in context (namely of a back - and - forth thread of mutual nasty comments), showing that the barb was (a) less serious and (b) effectively rebutted immediately.
Janet thanks for stopping by, sorry for leaving the thread on your comment space, I can be so absent minded, any way that pillow on the bed is from your bargain you had a few weeks back.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z