Not much learning to be had in
comment threads back then, not compared to now.
Not exact matches
Looking
back at the different
comment threads on this article the usual banter has atheists and Christians exchanging angry and and mean
comments at each other.
I haven't really
commented on EC topics since I bowed out 6 - 7 years ago, but my sadness over what was lost when that community withered is all coming
back to me having read this
thread.
Take 10 minutes from patting yourself on the
back and take a look at my blog / websites, and / or my
comments on other
threads here, and you'll be quickly disabused of the notion that I treat the Scriptures «as though they are written directly to 20th Century A.D. Americans» (For what it's worth, I'm not American, so why would I do such a thing).
Reading the
thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the
comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them
back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
If we could go
back to having them separate so I can see peoples
comments post match, and not have to scrawl through the match
thread comments, that would be great.
I
commented on it well before that
thread and only reason I posted it is he called me a liar about having money to
back my bets up.
Instead of focusing on the assholes, go
back and look through all the
threads on your own forums where Eagles fans discussed strategy amicably and exchanged «good lucks,» or said «good game» after, or
commented about how inappropriate some fans» behavior was, or who exhibited good sportsmanship, or who donated to Vikings» charitable causes.
Reading this
comment stream makes me so sad — filled with people who long to use Peter's experience to cheat, to return to stuffing themselves with cake, to drinking... unless, like Peter you exercise an enormous amount (and while it's less than he used to, it's still way more than most people in this
thread do), you'll gain all your weight and health problems
back.
I don't know if I'll ever
comment on MPL anymore; I feel that sometimes I might get enraged for stupid reasons and type in something unnecessary; my apologies if I have irritated anyone, especially SuperZambezi, he deserves more respect of his
threads and I feel like I've been doing bad, see you guys; I may come
back when this guilt wears off, maybe tomorrow if I feel better.
Interesting, I made a
comment on this
thread back in November of 2011.
NFB Mortgage Bonds vs Bond Funds
Thread Additional
Comments There probably is a place for Mortgage
Back Securities in your retirement portfolio.
Go
back and read my
comments in the other
thread.
I don't know if I'll ever
comment on MPL anymore; I feel that sometimes I might get enraged for stupid reasons and type in something unnecessary; my apologies if I have irritated anyone, especially SuperZambezi, he deserves more respect of his
threads and I feel like I've been doing bad, see you guys; I may come
back when this guilt wears off, maybe tomorrow if I feel better.
Based on the
comments on this
thread, it seems like its ok for Sony to have 3rd exclusives, but
back on E3 when MS announced Tomb Raider exclusive all hell broke loose (and for the record its just timed exclusive).
Go ahead and
back at any reward tier and then post your suggestion in the
comment thread.
So — going
back to the bigger narrative of how your
comment thread has been playing out — you grab one interpretation without thinking things through.
Looking
back through Dan DaSilva's
comment history, he was first active at RC as a simple troll, as in this a singleton
comment lobbed into a
comment thread from last year (on the subject of extreme weather under AGW, although that isn't probably relevant): -
I asked in the
thread if he thought expectations about increases in forest fire size would be comparable; don't think the gentleman has been
back to
comment further.
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter
threads and blog
comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk
back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set
back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
There was a
thread a while
back where some people
commented on where they fell out on a test that builds a kind of political matrix — I'm sure that very few of the «skeptics» found themselves scores as «leftist.»
I'm not saying he should have been quicker, but I can not check
back on all
comments in the
thread every time I visit.
If you want to know what I am talking about, go
back and read
comments from the Welcome
thread.
There is no attempt to claim precedence, but as far
back as September 14th, I put a
comment (# 3143) on the IJIS
thread which contained the following text...
If you're as interested in the exchange between Jim and myself as you appear to be (by dint of your interjecting yourself into the dialogue), I suggest you go
back to the previous Wagner
thread and read up on our prior exchange on the topic related to my question in the above
comment.
If you look
back over some of my
comments, on other
threads and blogs, you will see I use all I can find.
Go
back and read
comment threads here on the Hay paper, which is now looking to be pretty good science.
If look look
back over my
comments on this
thread, you will note that I repeatedly state that radiative gases can slow the cooling of land surface and by intercepting surface IR they can heat gases in the lower troposphere.
It turns out that Nic had an abridged version of his calculation
back on the Quantifying Uncertainties
thread some weeks ago, see his
comment here.
Also the ongoing
back and forth with Tom P keeps this
thread current in Recent
Comments and makes clicking on it easier.
In that
thread, I posted a
comment with an analogy of truckloads of orange juice, representing short - wave radiation from Sun to Earth, and truckloads of blueberry juice, representing longwave radiation between Earth and the Atmosphere and
back out to Space.
As SoD has brought the
thread back to the «
back radiation», I wanted to
comment on data from two of his references.
--
Comment in the Scientists»
Comment Thread (SCT), «Fears of Freezing: The 1970s are calling; They want their climate policies
back»
We'll be
back on Monday, Jan. 4th, but in the meantime, whether you need a break from year - end collections or just the in - laws, please make yourselves comfortable in the
comment section of this open
thread.
Way
back in April, I put up an «open
thread» post seeking thoughts on best practices to deal with
comment spam and the general notion of anonymity in blog
comments.
The motions judge had done an excellent job of putting the insults in context (namely of a
back - and - forth
thread of mutual nasty
comments), showing that the barb was (a) less serious and (b) effectively rebutted immediately.
Janet thanks for stopping by, sorry for leaving the
thread on your
comment space, I can be so absent minded, any way that pillow on the bed is from your bargain you had a few weeks
back.