In your later post, you admit to not being qualified to
comment upon the paper: what makes you qualified to arrive at the above statement (your exact words)?
Not exact matches
Buffalo School Board member Carl P. Paladino's latest inflammatory
comments to a weekly Buffalo
paper saying he wished death by mad cow disease
upon President Obama, referred to the first lady as a man and said he'd like her to be «let loose in the outback of Zimbabwe where she lives comfortably in a cave with Maxie, the gorilla» prompted calls for his removal from the board and sparked outrage from Buffalo to the state capital.
In his earliest works, he experimented with different media on
paper, mixing collage and drawing techniques to explore the role of iconography in communication and to
comment upon socio - political situations in contemporary India.
Using the
paper which this thread is the subject of, could you please explain why it is beyond the capabilities of someone outside of climate science to read, understand, and
comment fairly
upon?
Jim, if you don't have a
paper showing a regional correlation would you be so kind as to begin your
comments with once
upon a time that I might get into the mood of what I am reading.
The barriers to access to justice in the arena of family law have been well - researched and frequently
commented upon, both on these pages and in a myriad of academic
papers and government commissioned reports.
The
paper comments somewhat disapprovingly that the system in Scotland «is reputed to be harsh to women; certainly any system that imposes an arbitrary time limit
upon spousal support will disadvantage the less well - off whose needs can not be met out of capital».
I did my finals at Alexandra Palace and while the pigeons took aim at my tax
paper, I was
commenting on IRC v Ramsay (then between the Court of Appeal and the Lords), leading to the seminal decision of the House of Lords in 1981 in relation to tax avoidance schemes and
upon the rocks of which many a tax avoidance scheme has since been wrecked (see [1982] AC 300, [1981] 1 All ER 865).
The Issues
Paper then listed just over two pages of questions — about 35 in total —
upon which the Commission sought
comment.
Especially with all of the coverage of every argument — even those not of obvious public interest that may have in years past, gone unnoticed by the larger media — where counsel's every movement is blogged, twittered, and splashed all over the front pages of the
papers for everyone to
comment upon.