Sentences with phrase «commenting on the confusion»

While this would also address a comment on the confusion of the term «eat well be active» because of multiple initiatives with that name, importantly this was a deliberate strategy by SA Health to create the sense of a common theme across a range of initiatives that included different activities and the confusion identified by Aboriginal workers in this study was an unintended consequence.

Not exact matches

and other comments on Rachael Ray's Instagram, the result of confusion between the similarly named designer, Rachel Roy, and the ongoing hunt for the Becky in Beyonce's Lemonade album, HBO short film, and sequel to Obsessed.

I am sorry if my comments appeared to speak for all women and created all confusion — as I was reflecting merely on my own personal experience.

Commenting on the study for USA Today, Dr. Fleiseg noted that, «Part of the confusion is that the pitchers that throw curveballs tend to be the ones that throw a lot.

We appreciate that JACEI has commented in the past that it finds this «a complex and difficult issue» and note the confusion in your letter over the status of the Code and Resolutions with regard to marketing of follow - on milk.

PS - there's some confusion here: There are 2 Roberts commenting on this blog!

Alexander declined to comment on details of the Gang of 6's format change, citing the recent «confusion.»

Commenting on the reports on Eyewitness News, Mr. Adams said: «it is a diversion from the blackout we are suffering, it is a diversion from confusion,...

Enck's comments, delivered during an interview on WCNY's «The Capitol Pressroom,» preceded her continued defense of her agency's response to the water contamination crisis in northeastern Rensselaer County as state officials cast blame on the EPA for confusion among residents.

Not really a question here; more my brain dumping my own confusion on the matter all over the comments section.

I have stopped taking vitamin B12 (which is recommended on the Daily Dozen App) Would anyone care to comment on the article to help clear up any confusion and concern that I have?

Sorry to disillusion you again in your ongoing moment of confusion and lack of ESL skills but the fact is you hit all seven points on the head with each and every comment and reply you post proving you are nothing more than a vapid little troll with a less than meaningless life attempting to gain credibility by lying.

This is a place for the bare minimum, making quickfire comments through the day to keep people up to date on your life and thoughts.Along with this unique format comes a bit of confusion for the average user.

Scalzi commented on this very thread and Kozlowski showed both scorn and derision (as well as confusion), so your wish is granted?

I don't want people to get the idea that I favor rebalancing (I of course understand that the comments here are intended to be helpful ones — I just don't want to do anything to encourage confusion on this point).

Warner Bros. did not comment on how the confusion was originally made, but it is good news for Xbox One owners nonetheless.

Thek represented his own dead body in his piece, The Tomb, and Kelley commented on America's fear of death, eroticism and gender confusion in his text, «Death and Transfiguration: A Letter from America.»

In another post on this site, Markus Rex referred to this paper, noting that the press it received had the unfortunate effect of causing confusion (comment by Markus Rex on 24 March 2005, in response to a post on 10 March 2005 «Will spring 2005 be a bad one for Arctic ozone?»).

> A new comment on the post # 74 «Michael Crichton's State of Confusion» is > waiting for your approval > > Author: Hans Erren -LRB--RRB- > E-mail: erren21 @... > URL: > Whois:... > Comment: > Sea - level rise > > Although satellite data (TOPEX / POSEIDON (sic) and JASON) shows a much > steeper trend over recent years (2.8 mm / yr) than the long term mean > estimates from tide gauges (1.7 to 2.4 mm / yr), each method compared to > itself does not indicate an accellecomment on the post # 74 «Michael Crichton's State of Confusion» is > waiting for your approval > > Author: Hans Erren -LRB--RRB- > E-mail: erren21 @... > URL: > Whois:... > Comment: > Sea - level rise > > Although satellite data (TOPEX / POSEIDON (sic) and JASON) shows a much > steeper trend over recent years (2.8 mm / yr) than the long term mean > estimates from tide gauges (1.7 to 2.4 mm / yr), each method compared to > itself does not indicate an accelleComment: > Sea - level rise > > Although satellite data (TOPEX / POSEIDON (sic) and JASON) shows a much > steeper trend over recent years (2.8 mm / yr) than the long term mean > estimates from tide gauges (1.7 to 2.4 mm / yr), each method compared to > itself does not indicate an accelleration.

My article on «Greenhouse Confusion» drew vigorous comments from those who believe firmly that anthropogenic global warming (or rather climate change) is a real and immediate threat.

My article on «Greenhouse Confusion» drew vigorous comments from those who believe firmly that anthropogenic global warming (or rather climate...

I see from the comments that the article has elicited much confusion and opened speculation on many blind alleys.

The first point alone justifies publication of a comment on Schmidt since the confusion about where the SAC correction needs to be applied goes to the heart of Schmidt's argument... [Emphasis added]

I (and perhaps others) have confusion regarding 1) Wahl & Ammann (2007)... retry of # 2 is still unpublished (& not yet accepted) 2) Wahl and Ammann (2006)... unpublished (never published, now withdrawn) 3) Wahl, Eugene R.; Ritson, David M. & Ammann, Caspar M. (2006), «Comment on «Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data»

Reblogged this on I Didn't Ask To Be a Blog and commented: «This «confusion» between cost and reliability allows it to be technically true that renewables do not necessarily degrade the system.

The comment I made [in December] was that there is confusion in the minds of a lot of Americans about where the science is because of the debate still going on within the scientific community.

Judging from comments we receive here and discussions elsewhere on the web, there is a fair amount of confusion about how this process works and what can (and can not) be said with confidence.

I have commented above on the confusion created by the separate joint judgment of Elias CJ and Anderson J in Ben Nevis which detracts from the reasonable simplicity of the joint judgment of the other three judges.

Comment: Commenters expressed confusion about the intended effect of any agreed - upon restrictions on downstream covered entities.

When respondents were asked to provide examples of comments heard from buyers and sellers regarding the HST and its effect on the housing market, almost half of the comments indicated that confusion about HST remains more than one month after its introduction.