Sentences with phrase «comments about justification»
The judge used this case to make positive comments about justification, reminding employers that the requirement to justify a PCP should not be seen as placing an unreasonable burden on employers or «casting some sort of stigma upon them.»
https://www.dacbeachcroft.com/ Not exact matches
Buterin's comments about Ethereum are largely encouraging and reinforce the justification to stay excited about what's coming.
Placher's answer to my question about the relative truth or falsity of religious claims touches upon my comment that current forms of epistemological relativism provide a justification for affirming the truth of beliefs without worrying about whether they are true for more than those who affirm them.
Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now
What to make of Rudy Giuliani's fumbling and bumbling as he contradicted President Donald Trump about payments to porn star Stormy Daniels; his «storm troopers» comment about FBI agents who raided the offices of Trump's fixer - lawyer Michael Cohen; and his seeming justification of hush - money payments that led the law firm he worked for to drop him as partner?
Sheriff Russo «should have to explain to the public what the fiscal justification for this program would be,» county resident Siobhan Burke said on Wednesday night, raising concerns about somewhat vague comments the sheriff made to the Times Union last month about how funding from ICE «could offset the cost» of holding more federal detainees.
Sheriff Russo «should have to explain to the public what the fiscal justification for this program would be,» county resident Siobhan Burke said on Wednesday night, raising concerns about somewhat vague comments the sheriff
My comment was a series of questions about your justifications, which didn't (and to me, don't) make sense.
After continuing to be bit puzzled about Parker's justification for using the calm / windy versus Tmin relationship trends as a measure of UHI changes over time, I went back and reviewed Steve M's comments (see below at bottom of post) introducing the «Parker 2006: An Urban Myth?»
In the comment you posted at 12:16:47 on February 14, you questioned my credibility and the credibility of my post and the credibility of my reference without justification when you wrote, «I can see the points you are making about the recharge process and the way you allocate particular periods of recharge to particular periods of release but some of the examples STRAIN CREDIBILITY.»
«specifically suggest your PDF for the attribution with justification for midpoint and range» Judging from most of Curry's comments, and her entire earlier post about the «terciles», I would imagine that her pdf probably is centered somewhere between 33 % and 67 %, anyhow has some non-trivial probability of < 50 %, and (from her «extremely unlikely») has tails that essentially vanish well before 0 % and 100 %.
6) Harm: Respect: Further concerns are the authors and UWA have caused me harm, have failed to treat me with respect, not sort or obtained my consent and have not been able to show any justification for deceiving in my questions Prof Lewandowsky about LOG12 and by concealing from there research and following this particular named human participant whose comments (what else) have been collected
It's stunning when you think about it, that a comment like yours should be called for at this stage, as if some justification for the underlying view were yet required.
It is likely that Mr Damore's contentions demonstrate a stereotypical perception as to the allocation of roles based on gender — his comments about biological differences can only taint his supposed justification with sex discrimination.
«There is credible and compelling evidence before me that the defences of justification and qualified privilege... are reasonably likely to succeed,» Dunphy wrote, adding that Bent's comments about Platnick «appear to have been substantially true and correct or are fair and reasonable comment upon those facts.»
Ms. Saint - Cyr's brief comment contains, I suspect, part of the justification that one would get from those «responsible» in the LSUC, assuming any of them were prepared to be wholly honest about the situation.