Sentences with phrase «comments above notes»

One writer in comments above notes that he has several other amazon accounts, and any of his reviews made from those accounts are still there.

As one of the comments above noted, the Investment Manager / Manager / Board are motivated to string this out while maximising funds under management, to continue to maximise their fees as long as possible.

Not exact matches

It is important to note, however, that this was a federal - provincial JRP and its comments on offsetting (recommendations, not a binding decision) were largely informed by federal policy, especially the Operational Framework of 2012, referred to above.

Also note carefully the part of @Brad Cecil's comment and my response above on basically this same point.

I saw one comment above that talked about EverNote and that is what I suggested to my friend who has happily transitioned from sticky notes to EverNote and tells me it has streamlined her errand running.

I think if you read the comments above, you'll note that this recipe is very good in the heat.

To send a general inquiry about natural colors, complete the required contact information above and add your request in the Comments & Special Notes area at the bottom of the form.

I agree with most of the comments above, including the ones noting that we shouldn't get too upset.

I think I made a note somewhere above in the comments that I think I could have done that with my second child, but I wasn't suggesting that is what anyone should be doing or that it is something Yahoo should necessarily be supporting.

As noted above, no comment will ever be censored based on the opinion it expresses.

As noted in the comment by @phoog, and implied by the first paragraph of the Heller decision cited above, the Second Amendment makes no mention of age.

@ThePompitousofLove Yes, that's pretty much what I noted in a comment to Bregalad above.

Hi Ivan — I thought I had replied to a comment above where I noted someone else experiencing insomnia on the TWT.

On the note of it being difficult for people to understand that there has been damage, look at my answer to Rick's comment directly above your initial comment.

And on that note, I'd also like to thank Cynthia (Be Fabulous Daily)-- both for her fantastic post and her kind comment above.

Note to readers and such: I want to point out that Jeff Kwitowski is the spokesperson for K12, Inc., to help put his comments and information provided by him up above in context.

Finally, you should follow the instructions for submission to the docket; while we make every effort to ensure that all comments are placed in the docket regardless of how or where they are received, if you submit your comments to a departmental official or office other than as noted above, the person receiving them may not know to send them to the docket.

As I noted in response to the comment just above, people interested in self - publishing are getting to know the lay of the land, and that's a big change form a year ago.

As I noted in reply to a comment above, the pathway from Lulu to CS to LSI seems almost seamless now, and I think that's a good thing.

Just a note for anyone who may be interested in visiting my web site linked into my name, in the comment above.)

As I noted in another comment above, I've found that when I want to do something new but I'm afraid of making a mistake that will have a big impact, I first spend time learning from people who know how to do it.

Note: I am sharing this post with Amazon PR, in case people at the company care to comment on the above.

Hi Rebecca — To my knowledge, there's no way to make the manuscript itself (with notes and highlight intact) portable, but you could use Marcus's suggestions in his comment above to send what you've highlighted and noted on your Kindle as a starting point, perhaps:

BTW, I noted above in comments, a HDHP policy premium (after subsidy) is actually almost three times the cost of a standard policy.

I would also note in agreement with Connelly who commented above, that valuations have only been higher in two instances - 1929 and 1999.

Note: the above comments are based on a review copy supplied by the game's developer, Illwinter Game Design.

MR: The «essays» that Victor is promoting have nothing to do with science — and the focus of this thread (as noted in the comments above) is supposed to be about climate science.

The «essays» that Victor is promoting have nothing to do with science — and the focus of this thread (as noted in the comments above) is supposed to be about climate science.

(And note also Gavin's inline comment about freshwater fluxes and the salinity record, above.)

Note the discussion here and my unanswered question at comment # 17 above.

I just want to add a brief note here to say «thanks» to Wang Suya, above, who always posts such thoughtful remarks as comments.

As I noted in my initial comment above, I was using the term in the sense that Trenberth was, a political null hypothesis.

I would say the troposphere deserves it's own post, but since were on the topic (and see my comment above) I would note the Douglass and Santer 2008 papers are available on line for free at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.v28:13/issuetoc.

noted in a comment above with this link: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/sio-keel.html

Although I've previously addressed Mike J's objection at WUWT concerning ocean oscillations (as noted above in this comment), Mike is correct that I did not address his claim at WUWT «This shows that the sawtooths have been carefully manipulated to «reserve» the 1970 - 2000 temperature increase for AGW,» for which my apologies.

Note: in view of the above, no more comments to Richard Drake please, as he will not be permitted to respond.

On a personal note, I see that HotWhopper critiqued my topside comment in her January 23, 2015 post addressing Dr. Ball's guest opinion, above.

Paul — to add to my above comment, note that the Annan / Hargreaves paper indicates that even with a uniform prior down to zero, values << 1 deg C are very improbable.

Version 3, published 2 March 2017, adds an important reference; Version 2, published 28 February, incorporates additional reviewer comments and suggestions received on Version 1, as well as the updates noted above.

You might like to note that the precise same technique, of a series of successively shorter trend lines to the same end point, is used above by Eric Ollivet (this comment) in reverse, to show a deceleration on shorter time scales, which is the recent down turn.

As has been noted, James Annan made the above point to the IPCC with some emphasis in the chapter 9 review comments:

On a somewhat side note — Timothy mentioned his nature photography a couple comments above.

Anyways, I read around for some other comment on the guidelines, particularly the bit one of my challengers noted, which I cited above, as well as reading the guidelines themselves again.

Note also that.999 ** 928 in the comment above means.999 raised to the power of 928.

Note prof. curry has edited her comment so my comment above is now a non-sequitur, but it wasn't when I posted it.

I note that the comments above are all rather dismissive of Ian Plimers approach.

When I went to that Tech Note (how to access the Tech Note is discussed in comment # 103 above), I found the missing plots.

As we noted above, non-Apple users can not leave comments or upload photos which.

I second the above comments from other Note users and I'm perplexed how no reviewer ever mentions Android Home Screen widgets.

Previous Native Title Reports have commented on the Commonwealth's respondent funding scheme, 81 noting its effect in hardening the positions of those who already have their interests protected in any event, 82 and its seeming encouragement of litigation over negotiation.83 During the consultations, an NTRB in Queensland expressed frustration at the inequality created when mining and other companies are financed directly by the Attorney - General, putting NTRBs (and therefore the traditional owners they represent), with limited funding as described above, at a disadvantage when appearing in arbitration hearings about the doing of future acts.