I thought I would follow - up regarding
the comments above on structuring a 1031 Exchange to accomplish the intended transaction.
I am also returning to many of
the comments above on this thread, since there is a lot of good commentary in response to a couple of angry apologists for Mann et al above.
Fan @ 6.48 pm: Fan, read Judith's pertinent
comments above on the new data driven analyses on sea level rise.
I'm more interested in Artisan John's
comments above on appearance of the lock style with many sections and subsections.
Perhaps after the several
comments above on learning style, readers might like to get back to discuss the more feasible ways of differentiating instruction.
25); but both women are daughters, not of Jesse (David's father) but of one Nahash, presumably David's friend the king of Ammon (see
our comment above on II Sam.
You said:
My comment above on FB was prompted by friends whose kid is SO entirely dependent on his parents to sleep at night, that he is depriving them of their couple time and their desperately needed sleep, and as a result, they are constantly frustrated, at odds with each other, and left feeling helpless and misunderstood and «joke» about divorce.
As one who finds the majority of fan's posts to be distracting and never on topic, I have to admit appreciating
his comment above on Woleai.
timg56 comments «As one who finds the majority of fan's posts to be distracting and never on topic, I have to admit appreciating
his comment above on Woleai.»
I have
commented above on the confusion created by the separate joint judgment of Elias CJ and Anderson J in Ben Nevis which detracts from the reasonable simplicity of the joint judgment of the other three judges.
Not exact matches
Somewhat lost in the flurry of headline grabbing
comments was Trump's warning
on Sean Hannity's show this Monday that the upcoming election will not be
above board.
I believe that the mainstream media, when discussing bitcoin and the risk of money laundering activities associated with it, fails to consider or
comment on the hypocrisy issue discussed
above.
It is important to note, however, that this was a federal - provincial JRP and its
comments on offsetting (recommendations, not a binding decision) were largely informed by federal policy, especially the Operational Framework of 2012, referred to
above.
«Today, I'm calling
on the Department of Labor to update the rules that advisors» use for retirement advice, so that advisors «put the best interest of their clients
above their own,» Obama said in
comments at AARP's Washington headquarters.
All they do is redistribute money from those who do — see
comment on taxing the rich
above).
Right
above where one would normally like or
comment on a post, Facebook users were asked: «Does this post contain hate speech?»
I believe (as per earlier
comments above about the «slow implosion» of the eurozone) that there's a real power struggle going
on here.
Just to follow up my
comments on bonds
above, Rick Ferri has posted a useful piece showing how the «obvious» move to stay away from anything other than short - term bonds has hit a US investor's returns in the past few years:
This post and the
comments above have been more elucidating than your website (something you guys ought to work
on), but I still have a few questions about your service.
Essentially gambling (see end of this
comment)
on the forex pair using binary options in the
above example is equivalent to putting a margin of $ 500 with a forex broker offering you around 290 in leverage (plus a massive spread!).
Thanks to the
comment above, I have een looking for a tool like this and found it
on this site.
The
above comment on attrocities was supposed to be a «stand - alone».
Obviously not many of the
above people who have
commented have ever turned the page
on their dusty Bibles or have ever entered into a church.
On reflection, the particular
comments I
comment above is a good deal milder than I've seen, but I'll put in a few examples.
I do not even see a question
on any of your
comments above.
Also note carefully the part of @Brad Cecil's
comment and my response
above on basically this same point.
Even official publications like the Priest, Pastor and Leader of the Parish Community make no reference to priestly loving and the Directory
on the Ministry and Life of Priests simply re-presents and
comments briefly
on the passages mentioned
above from Presbyterorum ordinis and Pastores dabo vobis (cf. Directory
on the Life and Ministry of Priest nn.
On this see our
comments In chapter 5
above.
Or a conplaint similar to the ones
above, which either objectify the woman (
commenting on her appearance, clothes, or even, yes the size of their breasts!)
Even if your assertion were true, how does that bear
on the
comment thread
above it?
Don't you think (at least based
on your
comment above).
As I indicated in the
comment above, it's like the «promise of faithfulness, love, loyalty, and service» that we made
on our wedding day to our spouse.
It points, in Luke 16:19 - 26 to the future life as a reversal of the values of this (see
comment on Luke 13:30,
above, and also 16:15).
But the
above comments should indicate the direction which further refinements
on the notion of intention must take.
Based
on your
comments above regarding the Buddhists monks, it is clear / obvious that if I didn't experience adverse effects when engaging in intense / deep prayer and meditation but instead experienced oneness and tranquility just like the Buddhist monks then for sure, you wouldn't accuse me of being an unorthodox enthusiast engaging in self - manufactured religion.
That Saturday is the «Sabbath» that is referred to in this commandment, and which we are commanded «to keep it holy,» is something that you and I agree
on, based
on your
comments in the post
above: «So let's just clear that up: Sunday is not the Sabbath.
Also to clarify a slight oversight
on words in the
above comment.
Jeremy, I see that you have written some excellent material
on this question including the
above article and
comment below.
I'm actually just about done writing a post building
on the part of one of the
above comments — after being interrupted by a series of meetings this afternoon — it will be posted later today if you want to check it out for a more long - winded attempt at further clarification.
Just to be clear, the
above comment was not about the picture at the top of this article, but the picture for the story
on the CNN homepage.
William Gallagher, PS 4:263 - 74 (1974),
comments on the
above discussion, as does Lewis S. Ford, PS 3:104 - 18 (1973), in a review of a relevant book by Ivor Leclerc, The Nature of Physical Existence (New York; Humanities Press, 1972).
Having read through the tone of several of your
comments on this thread, I pray that the
above verse encourages you that you are personally referenced in the Bible.
Just saying that based
on the
above comment.
I am posting this also as a response to my friend John Lewis's
comment on my previous post and because of my friends mentioned
above, as well as because of a student paper that insisted that Romney's website answered all questions about his policy proposals, while the guys here say Romney never addresses policy specifics.
I guess I don't consider those
comments with as much disdain, and they are disdainful, because they don't conflict with my thoughts
on such a primal level as does the
above mentioned nonsense.
There is another
comment of yours I have responded to
above in the series of
comments based
on your attack
on Darwin.
For more info
on these citations, see my
comments above.
However, I dissent
on the
comment made in the article
above that it was Santorum that threw open wide the gates of the culture war.
In it he claimed that the Pope is not
above Scripture, and
commented on the conventional papal interpretation of the reported words of Jesus to Peter «I will give you the keys of the kingdom...».
As soon as you briefly
comment on the
above illustration I will, to your satisfaction, answer all your questions you have posed.