I have been unable to see
the comments at this article for three days.
But if he subsequently took time to read my material after replying to
my comment at his article, then it's plausible he's not only realized that this grandiose dream has evaporated, but also that he's now facing the far more real and very bleak prospect of trying to guess who might turn state's evidence against him just to save their own skins in investigations of where the actual «racketeering» in the global warming issue seemingly appears.
Not exact matches
NewsWhip said it looked
at likes,
comments and sharing of linked
articles from the top 10 publishers on Facebook over the past year.
Although it's tough to estimate precisely how many Googlers were recruited to work
at Twitter, and the company did not respond to multiple requests for
comment for this
article, some LinkedIn searching and sorting reveals it's pretty clear that those rumors aren't completely unfounded: there are about 250 current employees
at Twitter that have previously worked
at Google, a healthy percentage of the company's estimated 1,500 employees.
By doing this, the hope is that audiences will end up
at your site after reading an
article you've
commented on.
Based on data investigators have been accumulating, it's likely a «non-state actor» rather than a particular government group carried out the hacking, according to a Wall Street Journal
article quoting Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper's
comments on Tuesday in New York
at the Council on Foreign Relations.
At this stage, I often approach industry influencers and ask them to provide a
comment or quote for the
article.
Deputy Atty. Gen. Rod Rosenstein is taking aim
at Republican lawmakers who have drafted
articles of impeachment against him, saying that he would not
comment on documents «that nobody has the courage to put their name on» and asserting that he will not change his behavior in the face of threats.
Rosenstein's
comments came
at the end of a wide - ranging conversation
at the Newseum in Washington to commemorate Law Day, which happened to fall a day after the Washington Post reported that conservative allies of President Trump had drafted impeachment
articles against the Justice Department's No. 2 official.
We have since updated the
article to include a video clip from the sales huddle, captured before its removal, as well as
comments from Chingy, who performed
at the event.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein took aim Tuesday
at Republican lawmakers who have drafted
articles of impeachment against him, saying that he would not
comment on documents «that nobody has the courage to put their name on» and asserting that he...
Nice
article list Wiep I left a
comment at the «linkbuilding via blog
comments»
article, I really don't like people promoting blog
comments as a link building tool who have a nofollow policy on their own blog...
According to this Wired
article: Thinking Out Loud — How successful networks nurture good ideas: Every day we collectively produce... over 1 milion blog posts and 2 million blog
comments on WordPress Not bad
at all!
Sequoia and Kleiner declined to
comment, and Benchmark did not respond to requests for
comment from Financial Times
at the time of the
article's writing.
The
article cites
comments by Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist
at Leuthold Group, who wrote in a client note, «Historically, the stock market has done OK with rising inflation, provided economic momentum was also rising.»
Looking back
at the different
comment threads on this
article the usual banter has atheists and Christians exchanging angry and and mean
comments at each other.
The author of the
article mirrors
comments in my blog Uncertainty My Ass
at porttack.net.
This and many
comments to
articles on the debate are often filled with Xtians and atheists throwing bitter and nasty attacks
at each other.
Hey Aja, why don't you go take a trip over to Fox News website and look
at the
comments page for the Whitney Houston or Trayvon Martin
articles, and tell me who's carrying around the race card like a badge.
I'm stunned
at all of the
comments about this
article by people who apparently think they are followers of Christ yet show not one ounce of His love, compassion, mercy or comprehension of the needs of the dying — or the living.
In the anonymous world of
article comments alot of remarks drop to the cruel jab
at the other side just to show how clever an insult they can throw.
And nakedpastor reminded me it came from
comments to an
article at ebonmusings.
Go check out the
comment section in any of the gay marriage
articles that ran last week for a peek
at how vile and hate - filled christians are.
Since you're well aware of the nature of the
comments you'll read here and the kind of
articles you'll find, why would you look
at all?
437
comments on an
article concerning the foundational civil liberty to express one's worldview in a public and publicly financed (
at least partially) forum and everyone's squabbling over religious tastes - those CNN editors are quite shrewd.
But the New York Times writer failed to grasp that the
article in Italian was
commenting on off - hand remarks by Pope Francis
at an audience in November, suggesting that perhaps he agrees with Paul VI, who once said to a young boy that his dog would be with him in heaven.
Just look
at the
comments for the
article on the very front page about gay boomers.
Now, if CNN would give us REAL
articles, with actual topics,
at least a few people would start making
comments worthy of consideration and discussion (there would still be yammering idiots on both sides of the aisle, but that's never going to change).
Richard John Neuhaus»
comment on Douglas Laycock's «Substantive Neutrality Revisited» law - review
article (While We're
At It, June / July 2008) referred to Philip Hamburger's 2002 book Separation of Church and State as a «magnificent» debunking of Jefferson's wall between church and state.
Why waste your time reading and then
commenting at length on an
article about a man you believe is imaginary written by a Pope you don't support?
Look
at the
comments from the religionists engendered by the
article.
This
article is about how you want to be able to express your atheistic beliefs and yet look
at all of the ride, disrespectful, hateful, and prejudiced
comments on here.
I am still amazed, distressed, disturbed, etc.
at how many of these
comments have absolutely nothing to say about the
article at hand, specifically Mr. Dara's thoughts on the show «All - American Muslim».
As I
commented over
at Jason Boyett's site, your
article really struck a chord with me.
You are the reason we atheists can't stand reiligious people, TCB: in the
comments section of an
article about the religious knowledge of the general public, you waste all of your time talking about heaven and hell instead of the topic
at hand.
Just look
at the things posted in the
comment section of any
article or online posting.
and also if i have and your answer is yes then if there is a way to get the holy spirit back then please tell me and also please pray for me for a few days and i also want to know that really is the unforgivable sin unforgivable and really i swear on my mother that i don't want to go to hell forever and i am very scared of it please help me urgent and also i am sending a friend request to you on facebook and please accept it so that we can talk on this matter together and also i think you will like my page and i couldn't sleep properly because of this and in my half sleep in my dreams i was just visiting your website and finding my
comment missing and i as pleasing god and the holy spirit but as i was receiving my spirit again and again as i mentioned this in my previous
comment i was abusing in my mind i couldn't stop abusing and i have a very good mother she tried to wake me but i told her not to do and it was happening same things again and again and i told my mother again the half truth because i don't want to break her heart and she told me that there is nothing like ghosts and they are making me fools (you all) and i am telling you honestly before this i irritate my mother a lot i just watch tv and surf the internet or play games in my pc and i eat and brush late and also don't listen to my parents but after i saw your website i became obedient for a few days and again the same i am disobedient your webpage or
article ruined my life but this is not your fault and now days i am buy searching about this topic and my father (Vivek Saraf) broke his hands on the 6th May while riding
at a very high speed he normally don't go
at a very high speed but he had a very important work so whole he was riding a dog was running on the way and to save his life he gave a very hard brake and he with his nebiour fall down and got injuries in his legs and broke his hands and
at first he walked with difficulty and then the local people helped him on his way and took him to the local hospital but the doctor told that we need to go to Kollkata (the capital of west bengal, India) and so he went with his loyal staff because he is a business man and in the hospital he got cured but he still have the fracture in his hands so i request you to pray for him and his negibour also and i will tell you the rest in facebook bye and sorry for spelling mistakes in my previous
comments.
Read the
comments, you can see some harsh words directed
at the author of this
article.
Reblogged this on Melinda Blunk... Letting Go, and Letting Life and
commented: I read this
article, and I absolutely loved it... it hit the nail on the head... he didn't condone it, but yet
at the same time he didn't knock down on them... I feel the same way he feels!
As far as I can tell, no group spends more time
commenting on
articles about religion and spirituality
at this site than the Atheists.
«What follows is ugly», begins Fr John Zuhlendorf's
comment on The Tablet's
article against Summum Pontificum, written by Fr Mark Francis (who is, surely inappropriately, a member of the Pontifical Liturgical Institute
at the Sant» Anselmo University in Rome).
Eugene Rabinowitch
comments on Bridgman's
article: «Does he expect to find satisfaction, as he contemplates the radioactive ruins of Harvard Yard, in the thought that he,
at least; had resisted all attempts to saddle him with responsibility that was not his?»
In his
comments on Professor Jon D. Levenson's
article «How Not to Conduct Jewish - Christian Dialogue,» Prof. David Novak remarks that «Why Prof. Levenson teaches mostly Christian students in a Christian divinity school is a question he needs to answer, even if only to his Christian students and colleagues
at Harvard.»
Just to be clear, the above
comment was not about the picture
at the top of this
article, but the picture for the story on the CNN homepage.
I was taken aback to read Richard John Neuhaus»
comments (While We're
At It, December 1999) on my April 1999
article in Commentary and my response to Eugene Fisher in the letters section of the same journal (June / July) concerning the distinction between the Church as a human institution and as «the Mystical Body of Christ.»
Just look
at the
comments to this
article.
Perhaps you should actually read the
article before posting asinine
comments rather than just looking
at the pretty pictures.
As usual, of course, the
comments attached to the
article are needlessly inflammatory and only tenuously on - topic,
at best.
But it's actually a term invoked in a recent
article I wrote that provoked
at least 5,000 reader
comments and 32,000 Facebook shares.
I'm concerned that the
article has failed to generate healthy dialog - and I take full responsibility for that - so I'm going to close the
comment thread
at 5 p.m. EST on Tuesday, March 25.