Sentences with phrase «comments by the principles»

Not exact matches

Setting aside the vitriol and ridiculous comments this young man stood by values, ideals and principles that gave him strength no matter what doctrine.

This is how I would have engaged with your last comment in principle if you were a man and again I apologise for the inadvertent patronising that I was doing by failing to attend to this in my earlier comment.

In his essay «The Golden Rule in the Light of New Insight,» Harvard psychoanalyst Erik Erikson comments: «systematic students of ethics often indicate a certain disdain for this all - too - primitive ancestor of more logical principles; and Bernard Shaw found the rule an easy target: don't do to another what you would like to be done by, he warned, because his tastes may differ from yours» (Insight and Responsibility [Norton, 1964], p. 226).

The Washington Post: «Chick fil - A Appreciation Day» announced by Mike Huckabee amidst gay marriage debate After Chick - fil - A President Dan Cathy's comments on marriage launched a national «Eat Mor Chikin» backlash, another cultural bigwig, former Arkansas governor and Baptist preacher Mike Huckabee, announced Sunday that he was coordinating a campaign in support of the «company run by Christian principles.»

Comments by participants in other cycles of this course: «When I put the principles taught in the TSS course into action in the classroom, I found the students enthralled by both the experiments and the conversations about them.

Or whether they were naive enough to think that journalists would bury the line in the sixth paragraph and instead go in on the Brexit secretary's comments about how the principle of mutual trust, underpinned by robust mechanisms, can reduce trade friction.

When asked to comment on the delay and what the President would do about it, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, said the Presidency had respected the principle of separation of powers by forwarding the name of the EFCC chairman to the Senate for confirmation and it was up to the Senate to play its part.

Commenting on the discovery of the remarkable system, Virginia Trimble of the University of California, Irvine, recalls a famous principle put forward by particle physicist Murray Gell - Mann: «Everything not forbidden is compulsory,» Trimble says.

by Dr. Talia Marcheggiani, ND Dec 13, 2013 Health, Lifestyle, Naturopathic Philosophy, Naturopathic Principles, Robert Schad Naturopathic Clinic 14 comments

Referring to your comment: «Since heavy metals are minerals, following the principle of isopathy (like controls like), they need to be kept in balance by other minerals.

Apparently there are many patents being drawn up to use this principle to mass - produce prebiotic / probiotic combinations of foods, but it can easily be done at home simply by combining an RS source such as potato starch with kefir or yogurt — have you ever heard of this or care to comment?

Based on the guidelines set out by these Principles, the CESCR drew up its well - known General Comment 3 in 1990, on «The nature of States parties obligations (Art. 2, par.

Talking specifically about how the GDPR will effect child data, Piers commented: «Whilst the GDPR and regulator guidance makes it clear that personal data on children is worthy of special attention since they are potentially «vulnerable», on one level, the data protection principles that apply to the processing of children's personal data by schools have not changed particularly from the current regime under the Data Protection Act.

Wide Spectrum The comments submitted by individuals and organizations range from those cheering the Education Department's principles for school improvement to those who say its approach is overbearing.

Before a single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school authorities statewide; The Department of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions from the public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified of the impending disclosure of their children's data, and provide them with a right to consent or have the right to withhold their children's information from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest of public school children and their families are put above the interests of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.

● A comment section on 1) principles of language development addressed by the lesson plans; 2) activities that engage students in various thinking processes; 3) activities that facilitate the development of CALP; 4) activities aligned with the established objectives / outcomes; 5) activities that facilitate both content learning and development of language associated with the target content.

Comments can be submitted to the Principles Revision Working Group of IARPC by email (iarpcprinciples [at] nsf.gov) or to the Principles Revision Working Group co-chairs, Roberto Delgado of National Institutes of Health (roberto.delgado [at] nih.gov) and Renee Crain of NSF (rcrain [at] nsf.gov).

By: IARPC Staff The Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC) is seeking comments on how best to revise and strengthen the NSF Principles for the Conduct of Research in the Arctic.

Public Comment Policy This policy asserts Macquarie University's commitment to the principles of academic freedom, and its expectation that staff will challenge society's ideas and contribute to open debate by commenting publicly within areas of their professional expertise.

A recent judgement in Quebec Superior Court that deals with an insurer's duty to defend has lawyers here talking — not about the legal principle involved, but the juicy comments and details about the eye - popping fees charged by some big - name Montreal lawyers.

To frame my comment, it needs to be noted how the Report envisions Recommendation 3 being implemented: it contemplates that «the 2017 Lawyer Annual Report and Paralegal Annual Report,... and every annual report thereafter, would ask licensees to indicate whether or not they have adopted, and are abiding by, a statement of principles».

Mind you, that's not nearly as harsh as one recent comment by a (B.C.) corporate lawyer, who described the Quebec Court of Appeal decision as «poorly reasoned, spectacularly wrong in its conclusions and generally reflect [ing] a lack of understanding of both corporate law principles and commercial realities», adding that «parties to sophisticated business agreements will be far better served by agreeing to adjudicate their disputes in Ontario, where the courts generally have much greater commercial sophistication.»

The court in that case commented that: «The principle is that if an employee is not authorised to communicate with the company's solicitors for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, then that communication is not protected by legal advice privilege.»

I would like to think that the comment by our Chief Justice here in BC presents a signal that the bench is willing to move forward, at least in principle.

A legal assessment of the opinions issued by national parliaments «did not lead to the conclusion that the principle of subsidiarity has been breached,» Todd explained in emailed comments.

In commenting on Trial Lawyers here, I said that not only does the reasoning of the majority opinion in Trial Lawyers «rest on shaky foundations» whose weaknesses are brutally exposed by Justice Rothstein's dissent, but they «leave some important questions» — questions about the limits of the constitutional principles that it applies — «unanswered».

We do not have sufficient information to assess the situation raised by this comment with respect to this principle, and so express no opinion thereon.

The origins of the proposal to open communal title to individual leasehold interest have largely been generated by comments by the Prime Minister and Minister for Indigenous Affairs, and the NIC Principles.