Sentences with phrase «comments damaged its reputation»

Not exact matches

This is where technology has changed the game so drastically — employers, and everyone else, are far more likely to find out about employees» off - duty behaviour or comments, and the behaviour or comments are far more likely to damage a company's reputation.

«Those comments are in themselves a «rush to judgement», are damaging to our client's reputation, and reinforce Mr. Whitmarsh's concerns about the lack of independence, artificial deadline and restrictive scope of the PSA's review,» it said.

Commenting on the development, Owusu - Agyemang noted that his hard earned reputation was damaged by the publication and as a result he would ensure the judgement is executed to the letter to serve as a deterrent.

In his statement of claim, Mr Mahama said the false comment by Mr Bempah on UTV, has done damage to his reputation as a businessman, and, thus, praying the court to award damages of GHS2 million against the two defendants.

«I think the ongoing trial, which I'm not going to comment on, has done significant damage to the brand equity and the reputation of the Port Authority,» Foye said.

«I think the ongoing trial, which I'm not going to comment on, has done significant damage to the brand equity and the reputation of the Port Authority, and I'll just leave it at that,» Foye said this morning.

In The Point, Catherine Wilson contemplates the United Kingdom's recently instituted immigration policy for artists, which is damaging the country's reputation as a haven for free expression, and essayist Fatima Bhutto, from Karachi, examines how the art practices of three of her peers comment on the dangerous act of simply being a woman artist in Pakistan today.

The greatest damage to your reputation, on this blog, has come from your own comments.

They can communicate the fruits of scientific labour and comment on them, but the spectre that they may speak with the authority of Science, forever damaging the reputation of scientists is misplaced.

What would be fun to watch would be Wojick's using the comments of some of the denizens of this site in court to prove the intentional damage to his reputation.

A few years ago, when I was first launched into becoming the amateur investigator of what's up with whatsupwiththat, and the flood of really well crafted (certainly not done by ignorant people) anonymous emails conveying little known proof of Obama's secret Islamitude, and other lies that would damage Rush Limbaugh's reputation if he were to personally deliver them... Ah Say, Ah Say (Foghorn Leghorn accent) when I was first launched into all that, from reading prodigious comment - storms in many places, including judithcurry.com, but also invading more liberal venues, I concluded what we have here is less a movement for anything, than a massively stroked and stoked «Great Liberal Hating and Baiting Cult», with a very big self - organizing component, but definitely nourished in all sorts of ways by the folks you can read about in Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right by Jane Meyer (best book yet of its class and I've read many).

The official filed a defamation lawsuit against the people that posted the comments; once he learned of their identities, saying that the comments were false and damaged his reputation.

Annis J. applied the Supreme Court decision in WIC Radio Ltd v. Simpson to determine whether the blog posts was a statement of fact rather than a comment or opinion, as statements of fact are generally more capable of damaging someone's reputation because it is more likely to be believed by the public.

(1) Having their comments inappropriately attributed to their clients, employers, or academic institutions; (2) Having their comments bite back at them if they are ever professionally obligated to advocate a different view on behalf of a client; (3) Having their reputations damaged by a comment that is taken out of context.

Of course any reputation can be damaged by a comment taken out of context but isn't that risk greatly enhanced by the ability of the evilly disposed person to do so anonymously.

On November 12, 2014, Arbitrator Elaine Newman found that the social media comments of an off - duty Toronto firefighter, which disparaged women, the disabled and visible minorities (among others), constituted serious misconduct and damaged the reputation of the Toronto...

Yes, getting «outed» as a disingenuous poster might damage a company's reputation, but reading a social media post is like a funnel: most people only read the headlines, some people read the actual post, and few people read the comments.

For example, one thing people do that causes instant damage to their reputation is when they forward an email and their only comment is, «Please see attached.