Sentences with phrase «comments of the religious people»

Not exact matches

If religious people just stopped try to force their belief system on to the rest of us and left it up to their gods then you would suddenly find a huge drop in the negative comments.

Likewise, it would appear from the comments that both Christian and Moslem take offense at having their religious artifacts burned — in this particular situation by persons who are not of Moslem faith.

To paraphrase Jesus» comment, people who are concerned only with the affairs of this world often show more ingenuity in seeking their ends than religious people do in trying to accomplish God's will.

ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son of god and the word of the bible which is difference religion is made by people...

Although I'm a practicing Catholic, I can appreciate this comment, it's a little frustrating that articles like these make people think that just because you are religious you can't think «outside of the box.»

This article should be of no interest to you or any other Atheists, yet there are plenty of them making negative comments about the church and people who are religious.

You are the reason we atheists can't stand reiligious people, TCB: in the comments section of an article about the religious knowledge of the general public, you waste all of your time talking about heaven and hell instead of the topic at hand.

I don't understand why people keep complaining about how horrible religion and religious people are on the comment sections of articles.

To all of the people who are making comments degrading different or all religions, I'm not religious and haven't been since I was five.

When ministers comment on the kinds of men who are failures in the ministry they frequently describe among these types the person who operates a religious club or a neighborhood society with much efficiency and pomp and circumstance.

Two people commenting here (Topher and Chad) are explicitly religious, and two people commenting here (Topher and Chad) are battling the idea of evolution.

I see all these people leaving comments about the foolishness of this man and all those that traffic in religious nonsense.

atheists, stop ur bashing... the religious, stop ur loose interpretations of things u barely know of... as an agnostic atheist, i'm sickened to see that these religious debates have been taken to the comments section of many news providers... this is a lose - lose approach to debate people... i just want to read one intelligentt comment for once that doesn't include negativity.

At the press conference announcing the Annenberg - Gallup study, a member of the audience, himself an electronic - church broadcaster, summed up the report by commenting, rather wistfully, «It looks like the research is saying that all that religious TV is doing is to make people feel good and to get them to keep on doing what they «re doing!»

And why allow comments when all someone will comment is an insult like «Religious people are deaf and dumb to common sense,» instead of actually responding to the argument presented in the video.

The majority of 1700 comments here are posted by atheists attacking religious people

I think you have two fundamental misconceptions in your comment: (1) That Christianity is more threatened than the minority of other religions and non-religious people out there, (2) That only religious people can hope for a better future.

I believe that people have the right to hold and express their religious views, but they do NOT have the right to be insulated from the comments and opinions of others about those views.

Religious zealots who proclaim these deep religious beliefs who then act counter to those very beliefs make no sense to me, any sane person realizes this type of behavior and comments as simply hReligious zealots who proclaim these deep religious beliefs who then act counter to those very beliefs make no sense to me, any sane person realizes this type of behavior and comments as simply hreligious beliefs who then act counter to those very beliefs make no sense to me, any sane person realizes this type of behavior and comments as simply hypocrisy.

I'm going to only comment on the story, seeing people band together under (any) a banner of hope, regardless if it is religious in nature.

that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented: «The question courts must ask themselves in cases such as this one is whether the manifestation of one person's religious identity will interfere with the rights of others.

Read The Times report: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/education/article3807588.ece Read the CofE's press release: http://www.churchofengland.org/media-centre/news/2013/07/secretary-of-state-for-education-calls-for-continuing-partnership-with-cofe.aspx Listen to Michael Gove's comments at the event: http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/data/files/resources/5093/130703-Lambeth-Education-seminar.mp3 Read more about the BHA's campaigns work on «faith» schools: http://www.humanism.org.uk/campaigns/religion-and-schools/faith-schools View the BHA's table of types of school with a religious character: http://www.humanism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/schools-with-a-religious-character.pdf The British Humanist Association is the national charity working on behalf of non-religious people who seek to live ethical and fulfilling lives on the basis of reason and humanity.

In comments to be aired tonight in the BBC1 documentary The Blair Years, Mr Blair said the British people were wary of leaders with religious beliefs.

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented, «It is vitally important that people are able to criticise the beliefs of others, and this extends to simple satire of religious figures.

Naomi Phillips, BHA Head of Public Affairs, commented, «Through wide exceptions that exempt religious organisations from significant parts of the law, the Equality Act gives excessive privileges specifically to religious groups, permitting them to discriminate against not only gay and lesbian people but against the non-religious and those of other religions.

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson, who was on the steering group for the review, commented, «Government surveys have suggested that a majority or perhaps even two - thirds of young people today are not religious, so for religious education to remain relevant it is vital that this large group's beliefs are taught about alongside those of their religious peers.

you hold your religious and political persuasions to presently and to avoid acceptance of sweeping comments while you do not hear very little more about a person.

For religious and cultural reasons A number of people in the manosphere responding to Elise Linscott's article are commenting on the dorky appearance and demeanor of her ex-husband

Commenting on the figures, Rudolf Eliott Lockhart, chief executive of the Religious Education Council of England and Wales, said: «While it is fantastic to see increasing numbers of students opting to take the full course GCSE in Religious Studies, a reflection of the attraction of an academically rigorous subject that helps prepare students to understand an increasingly diverse modern world, we should not ignore the troubling news that declining entries for the short course mean that more than 100,000 fewer young people have studied the subject at GCSE level this year than in 2010.

A note about religious and conservative people that will be part of my comment on «Climate Science Denial Explained: The Denial Personality».

Just to echo Sally's comment (which seems to have been misunderstood)-- if «this rule is intended to ensure the quality of communication between people, to validate the person's identity and to promote security» — then what does it have to do with «religious neutrality» — shouldn't it apply to all situations where faces are concealed?