Not exact matches
re inline
comment on 24, What I noted was that the ocean skin equilibrium referenced in RC 5 Sept 06 could be influenced by variations in ocean currents and the cryosphere to affect
atmospheric temperature on the scale of decades.
Comment on» The phase relation between
atmospheric carbon dioxide and global
temperature» by Humlum, Stordahl and Solheim.
PRESS RELEASE
Comment on «Examination of space - based bulk
atmospheric temperatures used in climate research» by Christy et al. (2018) Research Report by James P. Wallace III, Joseph S. D'Aleo, & Craig D. Idso Third Edition, May, 2018
Our DOE
Comment focuses entirely
on the new science concerning the equilibrium climate sensitivity, that is, how much the earth's average surface
temperature will increase from a doubling of the
atmospheric carbon dioxide content.
JW
comment — What is in debate is the process (my words above) has a net effect
on atmospheric temperatures when all other
atmospheric conditions and processes are involved.
However, I think your last
comment concluding that the rise in
atmospheric CO2 not explained by increased ocean
temperatures, must therefore be anthropogenic, is unjustified, as it doesn't consider the effect of increased
temperature on the land based sources and sinks.
This
comment has already gotten too long, but I'd like to point out that based
on what we know so far, it looks very much as if Salby is making the same mistake that McLean made (in attributing the
temperature rise to ENSO) and, even more similarly, that Mr Lon Hocker made in a post at WUWT in which he made virtually the identical argument to this one (
temperature changes explain the
atmospheric CO2 trend).
Such oscillations might also alter hurricane patterns, but the main driver of hurricanes is warm sea surface
temperatures > 27C (we can all agree
on that, I hope);
atmospheric conditions also need to be conducive (see the above
comment on this year's rip - snorting season).