However whether or not it «suits the crime» or has an effect long - term, the threat of punishment in society is supposed to serve as a deterrent to some who might otherwise
commit crimes.
It is usually poverty that causes the stress, fear and anxiety that causes women to
commit crimes (usually to feed or clothe their children) or cause them to use drugs and drink excessively.
I'm sure that the fathers involved in criminal activities never anticipate the cost likely to be paid by their wives and children when
they commit the crimes for which they are incarcerated.
In most courtrooms, the story of a defendant's terrible childhood — what types of abuse or neglect may have prompted him or her to
commit crimes — is often told at the very end of the court process when a judge decides which sentence to impose.
We are unaware of anyone using anon name to threaten citizens and or
commit any crimes.
I'm more concerned with the epidemic of sexual assault and violence toward women that occurs throughout college sports and the covering up and protecting of players who
commit these crimes.
The other thing is the one that got Saban here in the first place, started a tailgate club of people named after Bear Bryant (and there are quite a few), and made Harvey Updyke
commit crimes against foliage in the name of deranged football passion.
There is nothing in that comment about black people, and black people aren't the only subset of the population that
commit crimes.
If you go by judt headlines athiest mudst never
commit any crimes.
What does that prove, but that some people do indeed
commit crimes against society and must needs be punished?
I know this about Athiest, they are less likely to get divorced statistically, far more religiously tolerant, and suprising statistic athiest are less likely to
commit crimes.
Acts 5:29 One must take one's orders from God, not from earthly authorities, if those authorities are asking one to
commit crimes.
It is sometimes argued that capital punishment is unjustified because those guilty of crimes can not help acting as they do: the environment, possibly interacting with inherited characteristics, causes some people to
commit crimes.
@ Doris... «Christ, not the man, but the divine, as the source of Christian redemption of wrongdoing, permits the Christian to continue to
commit crimes against humanity.»
Christ, not the man, but the divine, as the source of Christian redemption of wrongdoing, permits the Christian to continue to
commit crimes against humanity.
Instead of being a hatemonging, fearmonging, or demagogue type of proclamation, we have one that seeks to remind everyone that individuals
commit crimes, not ideological groups of whatever stripe.
Atheists rarely EVER
commit crimes.
For those who are not yet convinced of my lunacy, I'd like to finish with a word on the statement that, «Faith has always been used as an excuse to
commit crimes against humanity...» I will grant you that at some points in history, humans have used faith «as an excuse to
commit crimes against humanity.»
The percentages are small of those who
commit these crimes in the priesthood.
The nature of the God in whom I believe, and the nature of my faith will never... I repeat, WILL NEVER... cause me to act in a way that is detrimental to humanity, or to harm others, or to
commit crimes against humanity.
One can
commit crimes that warrant execution if you have formulated intent, understood the consequences of your actions and still elected to engage in the specific anti-social activity.
I think the death penalty is the answer for those that
commit crimes such as murder.
anyone with a double digit IQ would know that its the people who
commit the crimes and try to hide behind religion to justify their actions....
Homosexuals and black men were expected to
commit crimes of a sexual nature.
Apart from those justifications, no solution could be found for the most obvious question that occurs to one at once on examining any historical event; that is, How did millions of men combine to
commit crimes, murders, wars, and so on?
The ignorance and hate of the people who
commit these crimes is staggering.
Personally, I would prefer execution instead of letting people free to
commit crimes in other countries.
Minimal social security coverage leading people to
commit crimes simply to survive 2.
Must I ramble of a list of low class white people who
commit crimes and get gets swept under the rug?
Things are seriously mixed up in our country if Tebow is seen as someone who should be scorned, when so many other pro athletes abuse drugs, abuse their wives, abuse animals, and
commit crimes on a regular basis yet the public seems to be just fine with overlooking that behavior.
Worse than a crime itself is it to legalize a crime, because criminals are motivated to increasingly
commit crimes, which are called good deeds by the false prophets.
The man in this story did not
commit any crimes.
These people fully believed they were in the right, because they thought God had directed them to
commit these crimes against their fellow human beings, and they were largely unwilling to even begin questioning their long - held beliefs.
If we know in advance that we could not and will not
commit crimes against humanity, the question posed by this essay has already been answered and we could stop right here.
Although we have cracked down on drunken driving and in general want to hold people who
commit crimes while under the influence of alcohol culpable, we are not accustomed to holding such persons culpable for their ignorance beyond the particular offense.
Actually quite a few of them likely did
commit crimes in the way they handled their accounting, their reporting, and the way they manipulated the market and the people who trusted in them.
I choose to pray for the souls of all manner of people not only those who
commit crimes, but also those whom misfortune has twisted to refuse to see virtue past their own narrow group, and they are to be found among people of all cultures and traditions.
Such repentance includes the moment of remorse, but it is primarily change of direction and purification of the transmitted tradition so as to cease to
commit those crimes in the present and try to insure that they will not be renewed in the future.
The point is not the few that
commit the crimes, it's the many that cover them up.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to
commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
This is a slippery slope allowing religions to
commit crimes or commit socially deleterious policies because of their religious rights.
Other evidence of course may suggest a person with NPD has committed criminal acts, but many people who exhibit narcissistic traits do not
commit crimes.
When people
commit crimes of lust or passion against others, they often explain their actions by saying, «God made me this way.
However with all the knowledge we have today about mental illness, we need not make excuses for people who stand behind religion to
commit crimes against humanity.
Faith has always been used as an excuse to
commit crimes against humanity for the last 6000 years of recorded history, and it has always been a delusion.
as long as they don't
commit crimes, they should be allowed to live among us... those that do should be sentenced as any sane person would be.
Just remember that it is the faith of the radical Muslims that causes them to
commit crimes against humanity and themselves.
using you reasoning, because criminals are going to
commit crimes regardless, we shouldn't create laws?
In fact, a smaller fraction of Atheists
commit crimes than believers, so you could argue that Atheists are actually more moral.
Some atheists
commit crimes.