Actually, there is quite a bit of evidence atheists on average
commit less crime than the religious.
shows atheists
commit less crime, not more.
I can not point to studies as to why Atheists / agnostics
commit less crime, etc; I can only point to many studies that prove that is the case.
so the facts saying being a non-believer means
you commit less crimes.
Not exact matches
13A -6-67: (a) A person
commits the
crime of se ual abuse in the second degree if:... (2) He, being 19 years old or older, subjects another person to se ual contact who is
less than 16 years old, but more than 12 years old.
the abundance of purely uneducated Muslim believers, their oppressive existence in their self created repressive regimes, lifestyles, and governments, their radical inturpitations of their fairy tale book, the fact that their culture and people have contributed
less to man kind than any other culture and people of all the earth, their self ritious belief system that empowers them to
commit atrocious
crimes against humanity, the muslim men prance around in flip flops and linen moo moo's while they lock their woman in their household prisons to be abused slave - wife's, are entirely too ignorant to even build sewer systems and even after thousands of years that other cultures have developed running water toilets, toilet paper, and effective sewerage systems, they still whipe their pood - cracks with one hand (no paper) and eat with the other, and yiddle to the sky just before detonation of their suicide bombs that murder innocent men, woman, children, and babies.
All available studies show atheists to
commit significantly
less crime than religious people.
If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist
crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation
committed by Christians, even though atheists have had
less than one - twentieth the number of opportunities with which to
commit them.
Miller and Hoffmann said that only one other gender difference is similar to the one involving religion: females are far
less likely than males to
commit violent
crimes.
They are also statistically
less likely to
commit a
crime or end up in prison than evangelicals.
And the probability that a criminal who had
committed crimes against the state would be allowed a decent burial much
less actually removed from the cross.
Actually, in 2008 the Journal of Religion & Society did a study on this, comparing more secular nations versus Religious based countries and found that the more secular nations were much, much
less likely to
commit violent
crimes.
So if we employ your «logic» (divide.925 by.023) atheists are 40, yes 40 times
less likely to
commit a
crime then a Christian.
What isn't made up though is that atheists per person are
less likely to
commit crime,
less likely to have an abortion and
less likey to divorce their spouse.
A person could be born with a predisposition for violence, and once they
commit a violent act, it is no
less a
crime or sin because of their genetic state.
I know this about Athiest, they are
less likely to get divorced statistically, far more religiously tolerant, and suprising statistic athiest are
less likely to
commit crimes.
One might reasonably argue that McGwire's
crimes were equivalent to those
committed by all the future Hall of Famers who were hopped up on greenies in the»70s and»80... and were
less egregious than those
committed by all the ball - scuffers and bat - corkers who broke actual rules designed to ensure that everyone was playing the games fairly.
C'm on Goodell his problems were of a
lesser nature than
committing a
crime or injuring another person..
Home office minister Vernon Coaker countered that the vast majority of rapes are
committed by men who know their victims, «so this type of rape is the biggest problem we have to deal with - not something to be dismissed as a
lesser crime».
Stymied on his top immigration initiatives, Trump is making good on one plan that critics denounce as fearmongering and misleading: opening an office for victims of
crimes committed by immigrants, although studies show immigrants are
less likely to
commit crimes than native - born citizens.
I wasn't able to find the actual indictment to see what charges they were given, but I have a feeling this is much
less about «election interference» and more the fact that they were
committing OTHER
crimes to accomplish that.
A significant share of the gaps in income, education,
crime, and other socio - economic indicators between Southern states and non-Southern states in the U.S. is associated statistically with having larger African - American populations, although Southern whites are still lower in income,
less likely to receive educations, and more likely to
commit crimes, etc. than whites in metropolitan areas outside the South.
Firstly, I should point out that most sexual
crime is
committed by someone the victim knows - «stranger danger» is
less of a fear than «partner danger»... or in many circumstances «pimp danger».
The researchers also analyzed studies exploring the effects of an amendment of the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the add - on sentencing laws adopted by a number of states during the 1970s and 1980s, which added prison time to
crimes committed with a gun rather than a
less lethal weapon.
Researchers are exploring that possibility and other
crime - fighting techniques that rely
less on human judgment and more on big data crunching such as an algorithm that predicts an offender's risk of
committing another
crime.
Raine emphasises that environment can make someone
less likely to
commit a
crime.
Even after making statistical allowances for factors such as psychiatric disorders, economic status, and prior violent acts, they found that those who watched 1 to 3 hours of TV per day were about 60 % more likely to get in a serious fight, threaten someone, or use a weapon to
commit a
crime than those who watched
less than an hour a day.
Young adults who deem themselves «spiritual but not religious» are more likely to
commit property
crimes — and to a
lesser extent, violent ones — than those who identify themselves as either «religious and spiritual» or «religious but not spiritual,» according to Baylor University researchers.
He suggests, for isntance, that we might feel
less threatened by violence and
crime if we realised that although 20 000 people were murdered in the US in 1989, nearly 50 per cent more people
committed suicide.
The best thing that can be said about Rob Schmidt's
Crime and Punishment in Suburbia — aside from the fact that it's over in
less than two hours — is that it doesn't glorify violence
committed by sexy teens.
Guaranteed to fan antigovernment sentiments among its audiences, Dinosaur 13 is
less about paleontology than it is about prosecutorial overreach, political gamesmanship, dinosaur swindlers and true
crime — if in fact
crimes were even
committed, and / or
committed by the people accused.
What is significant about that character is how he conforms to McDonagh's skepticism, bordering on revulsion, regarding the worship of authority and / or uniforms, whether they are worn by cops or soldiers, all of whom he sees as rendered
less human by the tasks we give them, and who in turn reduce our humanity by the
crimes they
commit.
While this is undeniably the most spectacular in the Die Hard series when it comes to the scope of the heinous
crimes committed and the sheer amount of destruction that comes into play, if there's one thing that this fourth entry is the
lesser of, it's in the humor department.
Today it is clear that it is so - called capitalist democracy that has ominously spawned a complacent populace (outspoken, yes, but never the
less complacent), complacent enough to purge the collective psyche and keep it at bay long enough to enable us to
commit the most heinous of
crimes.
In general, high - risk male youth
commit about 50 percent
less crime as a result of winning the school - choice lottery.
In general, high - risk students
commit about 50 percent
less crime as a result of winning a school choice lottery.
The study found that the teenage birthrate is at an all - time low, that youths were
less likely in 2002 to
commit violent
crimes or become victims of them...
Although most of comparisons showed no association, the report claims that some subgroups of voucher students were
less likely to
commit crimes as adults.
Summary: Young children who share easily, resolve problems on their own, and cooperate with their peers are
less likely to drop out of school,
commit crimes, or need government assistance, says a new report previewed online in the American Journal of Public Health.
Other studies have shown that kids in after - school programs make healthier choices: they're
less likely to get into fights, have babies, use drugs,
commit crimes, or even gain unhealthy amounts of weight.
Research conducted on students in Milwaukee, Wisc., finds that children using a voucher to attend a private school, especially students that spent many years at a school of their choosing, are
less likely to
commit crime.
New Report Shows Milwaukee Voucher Students
Less Likely to
Commit Crime Opponents of Parental Choice Program mischaracterize report, offer nothing but hyperbole Whenever an academic study is -LSB-...]
A separate study of the integration program in North Carolina's Charlotte - Mecklenburg county schools showed that at - risk students who were able to attend their school of choice were
less likely to
commit a violent
crime or spend time in jail.
People who read are eighty - five percent
less likely to
commit crimes.»
Maybe
less than a decade from now, we'll be playing Grand Theft Auto V as a visual overlay on our wearable computers,
committing realistic - looking virtual
crimes while we shop at the grocery store.
If the Abbott Government does even
less they will be
committing one of the greatest
crimes against the planet that any nation has ever been guilty of.
If it is a
crime to transform the Earth into a hot and
less habitable place, what are the offences
committed by those responsible?
It is the same sort of loss of perspective (although
less extreme in degree) as that which leads animal rights activists to
commit crimes against researchers.
A common rule is that a judge must instruct a jury regarding any
lesser offense that's necessarily a part of the charged offense if there's significant evidence that the defendant
committed only the
lesser crime.
Being accused of a
crime is a scary and confusing time, which is why I accept legal aid certificates and
committed to helping those
less fortunate.