We know that the focus of the stimulus package is on short - term spending over 1 - 2 years, without long - term
commitments of federal money.
Not exact matches
The amount
of money from the
federal government is nothing compared with the total budget, and as I've seen here at Stanford, the
federal commitment and the
federal money is more than matched by private
money.
Deasy could submit an application anyway, but said
federal rules for the
money required a written
commitment to the terms
of the grant by the local teachers union.
As part
of the
federal stimulus package
of 2009, Congress provided jumbo - sized School Improvement Grant
money to states in exchange for
commitments to identify and restructure their most academically troubled schools.
The
federal proceeds
of crime /
money laundering / terrorist financing legislation (including regulations) «taken as a whole, interfere with the lawyer's duty
of commitment to the client's cause, which... is a principle
of fundamental justice [and] there is no need to conduct a separate analysis relating to the proposed principle
of fundamental justice relating to solicitor - client privilege».
On the surface, doubling the standard deduction and retaining MID might seem to put more
money into the pockets
of many middle - income households without compromising the
federal government's historic
commitment to home ownership.