The criminality in question may involve corruption, extortion and other crimes
committed by public officials and others in very challenging high risk jurisdictions where there may not be mutual legal assistance treaties or information sharing agreements.
And it should be considered a public offense where the killing was
committed by a public official, and not by a private individual concerning a private matter, which would concern «private rights.»
Not exact matches
These are essentially questions of
public policy, and if real solutions are going to be found to the problems of disadvantaged children, these questions will need to be addressed, in a creative and
committed way,
by public officials at all levels —
by school superintendents, school - board members, mayors, governors, and cabinet secretaries — as well as
by individual citizens, community groups, and philanthropists across the country.
«Unfortunately, the decision was forced through
by public officials who were blindly
committed to this project and abandoned the
public trust,» the Oneida Indian Nation said in a statement.
«When we have
public officials who are entrusted
by the
public with their trust, it's absolutely outrageous that when they
commit crimes and get convicted of them, that the same members of the
public have to pay for them,» he said.
These cases involve crimes
committed by public employees, elected
officials, candidates for
public office and other
public servants.
Another biggie: Certain
public officials who
commit crimes related to their
public offices may have their pensions reduced or forfeited in a new civil forfeiture proceeding brought
by the attorney general or the prosecutor who handled the conviction of the
official.
State GOP Chairman Chris Healy had requested the investigation
by Kane's agency, and on Monday, another top Republican, Senate Minority Leader John P. McKinney of Fairfield, said: «The crimes Sen. Gaffey
committed and will plead guilty to, as well as his prior violations of state elections law, undermine the
public trust placed in elected
officials.
In Connecticut, the SBAC disaster was slowed
by a handful of dedicated and
committed public school superintendents who recognized that parents had the fundamental and inalienable right to opt their children out of the destructive SBAC test, but the majority of local education leaders (and elected
officials) kowtowed to the Malloy administration and engaged in an immoral and unethical effort to mislead parents into believing that schools had «no degrees of freedom» on the SBAC testing issue.
Through demanding appropriate response
by public officials, Mothers Against Drunk Driving has turned drunk driving into the most serious driving offense one can
commit.
The dinner is a who's who of Texas, attended
by attorneys from major law firms, judges and chief justices, other local and statewide
public officials, university leaders, corporate leaders, and many other
committed individuals.
He held: «Principles of transparent and open justice require a court sitting in
public itself first to determine
by a hearing in open court the extent of the criminal conduct on which the offender has entered the plea and then, on the basis of its determination as to the conduct, the appropriate sentence... those who
commit such serious crimes as corruption of senior government
officials must not be viewed or treated in any different way to other criminals.»
Examples of such cases are Chandler v Cape Plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)(liability of non-employer for exposure to asbestos), Kynixa Ltd v Hynes and others [2008] EWHC 1495 (QB)(claims arising from alleged breaches of restrictive covenants in employment contracts), Romantiek BVBA v Simms [2008] EWHC 3099 (QB) a claim alleging that a
public official had
committed the tort of misfeasance in
public office when discharging a licensing function, OOO and others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [20011] EWHC 1246 (QB)(claims
by young foreign females that they had been trafficked into the UK
by foreign nationals for the purpose of slavery and that officers of the Metropolitan Police Force breached their human rights in failing to investigate their complaints adequately or at all) and Mouncher and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2016] EWHC 1367 (QB)(claims
by retired and serving police officers for false imprisonment, misfeasance in
public office and malicious prosecution against South Wales Police arising from an investigation
by officers of that force into alleged criminal conduct on the part of the claimants during the course of an investigation into a notorious murder in South Wales.
At a financial committee hearing, FSC director Choi admitted that several
officials within the agency
committed insider trading
by obtaining knowledge about the Justice Ministry's statement prior to its release and selling bitcoin immediately before the statement was introduced to the
public.