Sentences with phrase «committed under the code»

Not exact matches

In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 11.

The prosecutor explained that the offense committed by the accused is contrary to and punishable under section 419 and section 390 (9) of the criminal code cap 34 volume 11.

«That you, Yohana Margif, on or sometime in December 2015 in Abuja which is within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, intentionally forged payment receipt dated 15th day of August, 2014, of the sum of $ 4,687,500 (Four Million, Six Hundred and Eighty Seven Thousand, Five Hundred US Dollar) from MSDANLAMI NIGERIA LIMITED in the names of Chief F. Nwora and Mrs. E. Nwora on behalf of Verizon Heritage Limited, and you thereby committed the above offence punishable under Section 364 of the Penal Code Law»

«Also, he did transfers from account Number 0049765878 GT bank account the cash sum of 37,000 via one Egunlola Adewumi Christiana and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 390 (9) of the criminal code Cap 34.

Upon his fresh arraignment which took place on 28th December 2016 Fagboyinbo made the court to know that «Adesina Olajide on the 19th of October 2016 at about 12 mid night, at Ofatedo area in Osogbo did break and entered into dwelling house of Egunlola Adewumi Christiana with intent to commit felony and stealing and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 411 (1) of the criminal code 34 vol.

On the same day, date and place Olajide did steal the following item: Dell laptop valued N52, 000.00, HP laptop valued N100, 000.00, X - touch phone valued N14, 000, a school bag containing a purse and a GT Bank ATM card and the sum of N30, 000 properties of one Egunlola Adewumi Christian and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 383 (1) and punishable under section 390 (9) of the criminal code cap 34 Vol.

According to Ajibola, the offence committed was contrary to and punishable under Section 516, 319, 242 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Code Cap 34 Volume 11.

The prosecuting counsel, ASP Mireti Wilson, alleged that,» that you Olagoke Adedamola «m» and others now at large between same period and place at the aforementioned magisterial district did unlawfully kidnapped one Akinduro Robert and took him to unknown destination in such a manner as to prevent any person entitled to have access to him from discovering the place he is imprisoned and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 364 (2) of the criminal code cap 34 vol.II of Osun State of Nigeria 2002.

«That you Olagoke Adedamola and others now at large between same period and place at the aformentioned magistral district did unlawfully kidnapped one Samuel Eke and took him to unknown destination in such a manner as to prevent him from discovering the place he imprisoned and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 364 (2) of the criminal code cap 34 vol.

The charges in part read: «That you Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki whilst being National Security Adviser and Shaibu Salisu, whilst being the Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the National Security Adviser and Hon. Waripamowei Dudafa (now at large) whilst bring Senior Special Assistant, Domestic Affairs to the President on or about 27th November within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court entrusted with dominion over certain properties to wit: the sum of N10billion being part of the funds in the account of the National Security Adviser with the CBN, the equivalent of which sum you received from the CBN in foreign currencies to wit: $ 47million and $ 5.6 million Euros committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the said property when you claimed to have distributed same to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Primary Election delegates and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, Vol.4, LFN 2004.

«That you Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki whilst being National Security Adviser and Shaibu Salisu, whilst being the Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the National Security Adviser on or about 12th December 2013 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, and in such capacities entrusted with dominion over certain properties to wit: N90million which was in the account of the ONSA with Diamond Bank Plc, committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the said property by remitting the said sum into the account of Brains and Hammers Limited for the purchase of 7 - bedroom duplex house at No. 11 Mansur Bamalli Drive (D1064), Apo 1 Abuja and you thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532, Vol.4, LFN 2004.

One of the counts reads: «That you, Dr. Muazu Babangida Aliyu, being the governor (also known as chief servant) of Niger State from 2007 to 2015; Umar Mohammed Nasko, being the former Commissioner for Environment / Chief of Staff to Dr. Muazu Babangida Aliyu, sometime between April 7, 2015 and December 7, 2015 in Minna within the jurisdiction of this honourable court while being entrusted with dominion over money belonging to Niger State Government dishonestly converted to your own use the sum of N1, 090, 000,000, which formed part of the proceeds of the sale of 16 per cent shares of Niger State in the North South Power Company Limited and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 312 of the Penal Code.»

That they falsely described in several payment vouchers and memos) and thereby committed and offence contrary to section 311 and punishable under section 312 of Penal Code Cape 96 Laws of Katsina State 1991.

Consequently, the prosecutor argued that the defendants had committed offences contrary to and punishable under Sections 484, 422 and 419 of the Criminal Code, Cap 34, Volume II, laws of Osun state of Nigeria, 2002.

Joshua said the offense committed contravened section 418 and punishable under section 419 and 516 of the criminal code cap 34 vol II, Laws of Osun State, Nigeria, 2003.

He explained that the offense committed by the accused was contrary to and punishable under Section 509, 411, 390 (9) 390 of the Criminal Code Cap 34 Volume 11.

He had said, «Fatai committed an offence contrary to and punishable under sections 283 and 414 of the Criminal Code, Cap 34, vol.

In a Charge No: CR / 136/17, the defendant was accused of committing offences contrary to Section 25 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000, sections 157, 164, 363,366 of Penal Code Laws of the FCT and punishable under Section 68 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000 and sections 158 and 364 of the Penal Code.

The last count alleged that the suspect dishonestly misappropriated the sum of N14, 450, 000 (fourteen million, four hundred and fifty thousand naira only) belonging to Zamzalim Enterprises by converting it to personal use, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 308, punishable under Section 309 of the Penal Code.

Adekunle explained that the offence committed by the accused is contrary to and punishable under section 64 (a)(b) of the Criminal Code Cap 34 Volume.II Laws of Osun State of Nigeria 2002.

«That you Abimbola Adeniyi and Tope Ogidiolu did willfully and maliciously damage the uniform of number 458158 corporal belonging to Adeosun Taiwo and thereby committed an offence and punishable under section 451 of the criminal code cap 16 volume 1 of the laws of Ekiti State».

In addition, the court may dismiss the case or convert the case to a liquidation case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code upon a showing that the debtor has committed fraud in connection with the case.

It is specifically illegal to misrepresent oneself using a computer under California code and as Steve McIntyre points out, the action seems to clearly violate US code as well — specifically committing «wire fraud.»

The defence of duress is codified under s 17 of the Criminal Code which excuses the commission of an offence where it was committed under compulsion by threats of immediate...

In Ontario, a health professional who commits «sexual abuse» in certain specific ways, such as through sexual intercourse, must have his licence to practice revoked, and is not eligible to reapply for five years, under the Health Professions Procedural Code.

They developed a romantic and sexual relationship, and engaged in consensual sexual contact six days after the pharmacist filled a prescription for Ms. W. Under the Ontario Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18, and its Schedule 2, the Health Professions Procedural Code (the «Code»), a health professional who commits sexual misconduct by sexual abusing a patient (in certain specific ways) is subject to mandatory revocation and can not apply for reinstatement for five years (Code ss.

Section 270 (1) of the Criminal Code provides every one commits an offence who assaults a public officer or peace officer engaged in the execution of his duty or a person acting in aid of such an officer; assaults a person with intent to resist or prevent the lawful arrest or detention of himself or another person; or assaults a person who is engaged in the lawful execution of a process against lands or goods or in making a lawful distress or seizure, or with intent to rescue anything taken under lawful process, distress or seizure.

Under Penal Code 46.05, a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly possesses, manufactures, transports, repairs, or sells knuckles.

Audette, 59, a partner at the Montreal office of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP for almost 10 years, now faces six charges under the Criminal Code including fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, breach of trust, fraud on a government, and influencing a municipal official in Mascouche, a city north of Montreal.

(1) A person is subject to prosecution in this state for an offense which he commits, by his own conduct or that of another for which he is legally accountable, if: (a) The conduct constitutes an offense and is committed either wholly or partly within the state; or (b) The conduct outside the state constitutes an attempt, as defined by this code, to commit an offense within the state; or (c) The conduct outside the state constitutes a conspiracy to commit an offense within the state, and an act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurs in the state; or (d) The conduct within the state constitutes an attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit in another jurisdiction an offense prohibited under the laws of this state and such other jurisdiction.

Section 162 (4) of the Criminal Code states that every one commits an offence who, knowing that a recording was obtained by the commission of an offence under Section 162 (1) prints, copies, publishes, distributes, circulates, sells, advertises or makes available the recording, or has the recording in his or her possession for the purpose of printing, copying, publishing, distributing, circulating, selling or advertising it or making it available.

Under the Criminal Code of Canada, «A female person commits infanticide when by a wilful act or omission she causes the death of her newly - born child, if at the time of the act or omission she is not fully recovered from the effects of giving birth to the child and by reason thereof or of the effect of lactation consequent on the birth of the child her mind is then disturbed.»

In addition, a foreign national can also be criminally inadmissible to Canada if they have been convicted in Canada of a) an indictable offence or b) two offences not arising out of a single occurrence or c) convicted outside of Canada of an offence that if committed in Canada would constitute an indictable offence under our Criminal code or of two offences not arising out of a single occurrence that if committed in Canada would constitute offences under our Criminal code.

In cases where the alleged assault was committed with a firearm, where the victim was under the age of sixteen, where the assault was committed in relation to a criminal association or where the assault was a subsequent offence, the Criminal Code imposes mandatory minimum sentences.

Section 268 of the Criminal Code sets out that an aggravated assault occurs when an individual commits an assault (in one of the prescribed manners listed under Section 265) and during the commission of that assault wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant.

To be «empowered» to ascertain if breaches of rules, codes or guidance have been committed, rules have to be made under s 31.

In addition, the Criminal Code imposes mandatory minimum sentences for section 272 offences that are committed with a firearm, are committed in relation to a criminal association, involve a victim under the age of sixteen and / or are subsequent offences.

2 The test for committal under s. 548 (1) of the Criminal Code was settled by the Supreme Court of Canada a generation ago in United States v. Shephard (1976), 30 C.C.C. (2d) 424 (S.C.C.), where it was stated that a preliminary inquiry judge is required to commit an accused for trial when there is admissible evidence which, if it were believed by the trier, could justify a finding of guilt.

The offence of criminal incest is outlined under section 155 (1) of the Criminal Code and states that an individual commits the offence of incest when he or she engages in sexual intercourse with another individual knowing that individual is related to them by blood.

On March 23, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada released the ruling in R v Carson, 2018 SCC 12 where Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, writing for an 8 - 1 majority, held that everyone commits the offence of influence peddling under s. 121 (1)(d) of the Code who: (a) has influence with the government; (b) demands a benefit; (c) as consideration for the exercise of influence; (d) in connection with any matter of business relating to the government.

R. v. Arsenault, 2014 CACM 8 (35946) Several charges were laid against the Applicant, including one count under s. 130 of the National Defence Act («NDA») of committing fraud contrary to s. 380 (1) of the Criminal Code, two counts under s. 117 (f) of the NDA of committing acts of a fraudulent nature not particularly specified in ss.

Immigration detention falls under the framework of administrative law — the person being detained has not committed a crime under Canada's Criminal Code, but is being detained for immigration reasons.

Finally, you should also know that any crime committed on a space station is punishable under the Criminal Code, even though not technically within the territory of Canada (section 7).

[1] Mr. Boyes is charged with three offences, alleged to have been committed in the early morning hours of September 22, 2012: (i) dangerous driving, contrary to section 249 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code; (ii) failing to stop when pursued by police officer, contrary to section 249.1 (1) of the Criminal Code; and (iii) failing to comply with demand for a breath sample which was made to him under section 254 of the Criminal Code.

Thus, in accordance with Section 130 of the National Defence Act any Criminal Code offence committed by a member of the Canadian Armed Forces or any person accompanying the Canadian Forces has also committed an offence under the National Defence Act (hereinafter NDA) and the Code of Service Discipline, found under Part III of the NDA applies.

There are legal precedents for war crimes prosecutions based on acts that were committed with recklessness, he added, and recklessness or negligence does not necessarily absolve someone of criminal responsibility under the United States military code.

In his blog, Sookman note the offence of «luring a child» under s. 172.1 (1) of the Criminal Code requires the offence be committed by means of a computer system within the meaning of s. 342.1 (2) of the Criminal Code.

It is good to hear that the Law Society acted in this matter, however I have seen where the LSUC has permitted a lawyer to assist his client to commit an Offence under a provincial statute which is not only an ethical issue, but an issue which involved direct violations of the LSUC Code of Conduct for lawyers.

As it stands, euthanasia and assisted suicide are illegal under the Criminal Code of Canada (Section 241 makes it illegal to (a) counsel, or (b) aid or abet, a person to commit suicide), which applies in all provinces and territories including Quebec and can not be amended by provincial / territorial enactment.

Lancaster House is committed to fulfilling its obligations under the Ontario Human Rights Code and Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and welcomes and encourages applications from people with disabilities.