Not exact matches
The New York State Board
of Regents is expected to act on two committee reports Tuesday, calling for a delay the impact
of Common Core - related state
assessments on educators and
students and reducing the level
of local school district testing associated with the new teacher evaluation law and higher standards for teaching and
learning.
If the new
Common Core
assessments set the high school graduation bar at true college readiness — meaning
students are on track to take credit bearing courses from day one — the country is likely to
learn that scarcely one - third
of all
students, and many fewer low - income
students, are at that level now.
Westerberg: Time should be provided for teachers to get together at the course or department level on a regular basis to identify big - picture course
learning goals, rubrics, or scoring guides that delineate expected
student performance standards; that is, what good work looks like for each goal, and
common assessment items or tasks that evaluate
student performance vis — vis key elements
of each rubric.
Unlike teaching a required course to college
students with a
common denominator
of age and educational preparedness, the challenge at a community college is to create a supportive and active
learning environment for the discussion
of ideas, writing
assessment, and peer reviews among a community
of strangers.
Over the course
of the two - year project, schools will begin to implement pathway - wide systems
of performance - based
assessment that include the use
of common, outcomes - aligned rubrics and performance tasks, and a culminating student demonstration of learning and skill — all aligned with the Common Core and th
common, outcomes - aligned rubrics and performance tasks, and a culminating
student demonstration
of learning and skill — all aligned with the
Common Core and th
Common Core and the 4Cs.
These uses
of assessment in the service
of learning can be contrasted with the use
of assessment simply to grade all
students on how well they perform against
common year - level expectations.
Webinar participants will
learn about the wealth
of information well - crafted
assessments can reveal, and will gain insights into how districts
of all sizes can use
assessment strategies, tools, and services to improve
student outcomes and prepare for the
Common Core State Standards.
One thing I've
learned as I work with schools across the country is that there are a lot
of different definitions collaborative teams are using for
common formative
assessments, and what these teams think
common formative
assessments are influences how they write and use these
assessments with their
students.
Vander Ark will examine how intelligent adaptive
learning can fulfill the promise of differentiated, individualized instruction; what students should expect in a personalized learning experience; how Intelligent Adaptive Learning ™ can impact Common Core implementation and assessment; and how blended learning will help to implement the new st
learning can fulfill the promise
of differentiated, individualized instruction; what
students should expect in a personalized
learning experience; how Intelligent Adaptive Learning ™ can impact Common Core implementation and assessment; and how blended learning will help to implement the new st
learning experience; how Intelligent Adaptive
Learning ™ can impact Common Core implementation and assessment; and how blended learning will help to implement the new st
Learning ™ can impact
Common Core implementation and
assessment; and how blended
learning will help to implement the new st
learning will help to implement the new standards.
It's been well - established in the literature around professional
learning communities that team - developed
common assessments can serve as powerful tools to monitor
students» level
of proficiency in the essential standards (DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, Many, and Mattos 2016).
Download our free apps for
Common Core, Science, and
student assessment; scan bubble sheets from your iPad, capture evidence
of student learning, and start pinning standards - aligned resources.
To stay on top
of the needs
of a highly mobile enrollment, educators in the Aldine Independent School District in north Houston rely on frequent
common assessments across subjects and grades to gauge how well
students are
learning.
A recent report by
Common Core, Inc., its title intended to demonstrate that
students are «
Learning Less» because
of assessments, included some interesting findings: ninety percent
of teachers say that when a subject is included in a state's system
of testing, it is taken more seriously.
It also drives teams to create a series
of common formative
assessments that are administered to
students multiple times throughout the year to gather ongoing evidence
of student learning.
NJPSA has been working collaboratively with the Department
of Education on ways to support teachers so that they can
learn more about the
Common Core,
assessment design, instructional models, and the leadership and school culture necessary to foster shared accountability for
student learning.
Each Friday staff gather to review
student performance, plan for
common lessons and
assessments, and provide for the
learning of every child so that no one falls behind and those who are advanced get the support they need.
Develop
common formative
assessments so that collaborative groups
of teachers can identify individual and groups
of students»
learning needs and generate innovative instruction and intervention plans to ensure all
students achieve those essential standards.
Make the connection between the Marzano Taxonomy and
Common Core State Standards for the most effective
assessments of student learning I was having a conversation with some educator friends recently.
Make the connection between the Marzano Taxonomy and
Common Core State Standards for the most effective
assessments of student learning
This conflict should be avoided with the
Common Core State Standards because an equal amount
of effort is going into the development
of next generation, computer - adaptive
student assessment systems that will more robustly measure
student learning against the standards.
Coalition schools organize
learning, teaching, and
assessment around ten
common principles, including
students learning to use their minds well, «less is more,» personalization,
student as worker, and exhibitions as demonstration
of mastery.
Attendees at this webinar will
learn how to develop formative and summative classroom
assessments that will prepare teachers and
students for the new demands
of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium and the Partnership for Assessment
of Readiness for College and Careers, support
student learning, and align to the
Common Core standards.
As teachers struggle to work with the rigorous performance
assessment demands
of the
Common Core State Standards, a well - designed project can be the vehicle for highly authentic, rigorous, and personalized
learning experiences for
students.
Let's empower teams with tools and support in the design and use
of common formative
assessment so that they can begin realizing the power that comes from meaningful work to improve
student learning.
It's been well - established in the literature around professional
learning communities that team - developed
common assessments can serve as powerful tools to monitor
students» level
of proficiency in the essential standards (DuFour, et al 2016).
In the third one - day institute series, Using Formative
Assessment to Meet the Demands
of the
Common Core, educators will
learn how to align the multiple measures
of assessment available with the CCSS and create a system
of data collection and analysis to enable higher levels
of student achievement.
In order to build a curriculum, instruction, and
assessment system, the district must first have a curriculum in place — a set
of common learning expectations that the district has coalesced around and accepted as the expected
learnings for ALL district
students.
A group
of some
of the largest school districts in California is launching an online bank
of student assessment tools to help teachers measure
learning as the rollout
of the new
Common Core curriculum gains speed this year.
As Michael J. Schmoker notes in his 2006 analysis
of the American educational system, Results Now: How We Can Achieve Unprecedented Improvements in Teaching and
Learning, providing teachers with time to meet regularly to carefully examine
assessment data, set goals, share and create lessons, develop
common formative
assessments, and review
student work will ultimately lead to a better end result.
While the intent to give a
common assessment was worthy, the planning and execution did not result in an improvement
of student learning.
I was reminded
of this recently when working with a school new to analyzing
common assessments to look at
student learning.
Develop a shared understanding
of assessments, implement
common formative
assessments, analyze evidence
of student learning, and use that evidence to
learn from one another and respond to the individual needs
of students.
Our work
of creating
common performance assessments and rubrics and scoring them across classrooms has created a culture of inquiry and a collaborative atmosphere... This is a result of our process of learning about the Common Core, unpacking standards, writing lesson plans and tasks, sharing those plans, giving each other feedback, creating common rubrics, and collectively examining student
common performance
assessments and rubrics and scoring them across classrooms has created a culture
of inquiry and a collaborative atmosphere... This is a result
of our process
of learning about the
Common Core, unpacking standards, writing lesson plans and tasks, sharing those plans, giving each other feedback, creating common rubrics, and collectively examining student
Common Core, unpacking standards, writing lesson plans and tasks, sharing those plans, giving each other feedback, creating
common rubrics, and collectively examining student
common rubrics, and collectively examining
student work.
Together, the Partnership for Assessment
of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) received more than $ 360 million in federal grants to develop these
Common Core — aligned next - generation
assessments that will not only measure deeper
learning but also evaluate
student and educator performance (Gewertz, 2012).
WHEREAS, the new evaluation system based on NYS Education Law 3012c disproportionately weights the use
of high stakes test scores over qualitative
assessments as «Measures
of Student Learning (MOSL)» in determining teacher performance, leading to a proliferation of Common Core - aligned tests with devastating consequences for teaching and learning conditions in our scho
Learning (MOSL)» in determining teacher performance, leading to a proliferation
of Common Core - aligned tests with devastating consequences for teaching and
learning conditions in our scho
learning conditions in our schools, and
A process is put in place to ensure teams clarify the essential
learnings for each course, grade level, and unit
of instruction; establish consistent pacing; create frequent
common assessments to monitor
student learning, and agree on the criteria they will use to judge the quality
of student work.
For example, teams are expected to clarify essential outcomes; develop and utilize the results
of common, formative
assessments; collaboratively analyze
student learning (particularly the results
of formative
common assessments); and reflect on their instructional practices in order to improve the
learning levels
of their
students.
Schools and school systems will need a laser - like focus on building the capacity
of teachers through strong induction programs, job - embedded professional
learning, support for implementation
of the new
Common Core Performance Standards with accompanying
assessments and teacher evaluation programs linked to
student achievement outcomes.
Smarter Balanced
Assessments: The Smarter Balanced Assessment replaces the California Standardized Testing and Reporting and will measure
student learning of the new
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for both English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics.
«Collaborative
Common Assessments brings compelling clarity, meaning, and power to the work of common assessments — not as another high - stakes assessment event, but as a focused practice that helps all students
Common Assessments brings compelling clarity, meaning, and power to the work of common assessments — not as another high - stakes assessment event, but as a focused practice that helps all stud
Assessments brings compelling clarity, meaning, and power to the work
of common assessments — not as another high - stakes assessment event, but as a focused practice that helps all students
common assessments — not as another high - stakes assessment event, but as a focused practice that helps all stud
assessments — not as another high - stakes
assessment event, but as a focused practice that helps all
students learn.
Through a collaboration with the Measured Progress Assessment Services team, a new set
of rigorous
common assessments were developed to inform instruction, promote instructional equity, and create meaningful
learning experiences for teachers and
students.
According to the
Common Core State Standards, the National Council
of Teachers
of Mathematics, and data from international
assessments,
students need to become problem - solvers,
learn to reason and communicate mathematically, value mathematics, and become confident in their ability to do mathematics in order to be prepared for higher education and the global workforce.
Changing the
common sense beliefs
of teachers about heterogeneous grouping effects on the
learning of struggling
students requires those providing leadership to bring relevant evidence to the attention
of their colleagues in accessible and convincing ways, to encourage actual trials with heterogeneous groupings under conditions which include opportunities for practice, feedback and coaching and to help teachers generate «the kind
of assessment information that will make the impact
of tracking and detracking more visible» (Riehl, 2000).
Professional
learning communities that perform
common assessments have found that their collaboration and dialogue over instructional goals, coupled with a review
of student data, lead to gains in
student achievement (Christman et al., 2009; King, 2012; Reeves, 2004; Schmoker, 2004).
This is a semi-structured, teacher - led
learning activity in which teachers organize themselves to share the results
of their performance
assessments -
student work samples - with other teachers in their school; to gain confidence in their ability to score accurately using
common scoring rubrics...
All educational
assessments, from lengthy high - stakes summative exams to quick skill checks, share one thing in
common: They provide a measure
of student learning — knowledge, skill, attitude, and / or ability — at a specific moment in time.
Schools interested in the use
of common formative
assessment, interim benchmark
assessment, and learner - centric
assessment to help inform and differentiate instruction and engage
students for personalized
learning are encouraged to apply at www.naiku.net/grants.
When it comes to
assessment, this seems to be a
common misconception: Some educators mistakenly believe that longer tests are always better measures
of student learning.
Colorado, while mandating that 50 percent
of a teacher's evaluation be based on
student growth, allows districts to choose their own
student learning measures — including state
assessment results — and decide how to weight them.66 In addition to adjustments to how much
student growth factors into evaluations, some states, including Georgia and Connecticut, have opted to delay full implementation
of their evaluation systems while they transition to the more rigorous
Common Core standards.67 68
Introduction to the Third Edition Chapter 1: A Guide to Action for Professional
Learning Communities at Work Chapter 2: Defining a Clear and Compelling Purpose Chapter 3: Building the Collaborative Culture
of a Professional
Learning Community Chapter 4: Creating a Results Orientation in a Professional
Learning Community Chapter 5: Establishing a Focus on
Learning Chapter 6: Creating Team - Developed
Common Formative
Assessments Chapter 7: Responding When Some
Students Don't
Learn Chapter 8: Hiring, Orienting, and Retaining New Staff Chapter 9: Addressing Conflict and Celebrating in a Professional
Learning Community Chapter 10: Implementing the Professional
Learning Community Process Districtwide Conclusion: The Fierce Urgency
of Now