Additionally, this ID /
creationist argument fails in light of clear examples of
common forms with discrete evolutionary lineages and accompanying discrete genetic const - itutions (e.g. new world v. old world vultures, etc).
Once again you sidestep any examination of the criticisms to see whether or not they are warranted or even asking someone how they arrived at a given conclusion or what justification they have for a given premise and claim, based upon an
argument from incredulity which is
common, for example, in
creationist literature to the effect of, «I can't believe that there is a natural explanation for the origin of the eye, therefore the origin of the eye must be supernatural.»