Sentences with phrase «common frame of reference»

Eventually I realized I did — I needed to do this with someone who has a common frame of reference.

FRBR is a conceptual model that provides the cataloguing community with a common frame of reference that allows for a more consistent discussion of the issues that affect bibliographic control.

This score range was introduced to establish an easy - to - understand, common frame of reference for lenders and consumers.

So, as a staff, we've tried to get to a point where we share a common frame of reference for what we mean in our organization relative to college readiness, what academic rigor is and what it is not, and what high academic expectations are and what they are not.

Shamoo agrees that labs need a common frame of reference for thinking about ethics.

Given the absence of a «common frame of reference,» Bleich sees no possibility of entering into a dialogue with Gordis.

And in so far as that doctrine continues to dominate Western thought we may expect the recurring horrors of war and revolution, because it is a doctrine whose logic deprives mankind of a common frame of reference and in the end sets every man against every other man.

A common frame of reference for religious faith is the necessary condition of enduring co-operation.

By being culturally relevant to non-believers, we can establish a common frame of reference from which we can begin to look toward God with them as we reflect God to them.

It seems on first glance that, within this common frame of reference, the argument between the churches focuses most intensely upon the relation between authority and office (under which I include matters of jurisdiction and polity).

In my opening statement, I told the audience that a debate requires a common frame of reference, a core agreement about ultimate values — with the conflict about how to achieve an agreed upon goal.

Not exact matches

He defines two descriptions as complementary if (a) they have a common referent, (b) the logical preconditions for their use are mutually exclusive, and (c) each is in principle exhaustive in its own frame of reference.

Special revelations — the only sort recognized by this kind of theology — have always needed to be checked by some more general frame of reference: the written Scriptures coolly and historically studied, the tradition and common experience of the church, and the still more general experiences and tested beliefs of mankind.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

There is no universal frame of reference which provides a common pattern of thought to the whole Protestant community.

More to the point, Newton's «Scholium» which introduces the notions of «absolute, true, mathematical» space and time, and «relative, apparent, common» space and time (PNP 6 - 12), makes clear that absolute space and absolute time continua are thought to be necessary for a satisfactory theory of dynamics, that is, a theory of the forces which determine • the motion of material objects.7 The main idea in Newton's position is that not all physical frames of reference are suitable for satisfactory analysis of the motion of material objects; in fact, no physical frame of reference is completely suitable for this purpose.

The best dating advice she ever received was «date someone who shares your common interests, has a similar frame of reference, and totally gets you.»

As the picture progresses, Marlo's frame of reference does shift, generating a bittersweetness that nicely complements the wealth of humor mined from what must surely be common afflictions on unprepared parents.

The writer suggests a need for «a change in frame of reference — from a defined body of common curriculum content to a well - articulated path of long - term learning progress.»

This definition of learning as progress requires a change in frame of reference — from a defined body of common curriculum content to a well - articulated path of long - term learning progress.

... to persuade investors with an interest in the long term to change their whole frame of reference: to recognize that we now live in different, more constrained, world in which prices of raw materials will rise and shortages will be common.

The same could be true of the next generation of lawyers and their current legal research professors.2 We have likely reached a point at which our frames of reference diverge sufficiently that we don't share a common reference point for approaching the structure of legal research.3 Arguably, the tech - saturated millennials need a solid research foundation more than any generation before them.4 Yet many of them regard our legal research instruction as cumbersome or outdated.5 Having grown up using intuitive electronic devices, and using them to good advantage, 6 many modern law students resist legal research methods that require rigidity, formality, or — worst of all — a trip to a print library.7 Indeed, many of them are downright «mistrustful both of physical libraries and of those who extol their virtues.»

His frame of reference was so different from mine that we didn't share a common vocabulary, at least on that particular point.

What the book does is give a frame of reference for addressing some common problems that we all run into with relationships.