Not exact matches
We relate to God using ideas that are
common to our shared
human experience because that is all we know how to
do.
But yet, the fact remains that in man's «
common»
experience, in those very
human and historical — and sinful — limitations we know so well, we have the right to find in parabolic fashion creaturely representations of that which God is, and that which God has
done, and that which God purposes to bring to pass in and for and through and with and to this his world and the men and women whom he has placed in it.
It
does not require profound knowledge of
human psychology or vast
experience of life to understand why the imagination can never provide a basis for a
common faith.
He is convinced that the language about God
does not really add anything important to our understanding of
common human experience.
We provide that space for organizations, institutions or independent volunteer staff where you can find, discuss and enrich themselves through
common experiences in the past, allowing a mutual aid for the progress of the various activities implemented through international collaboration between educators who don't know one other but with a
common goal,
human development.
Does this form allow us to make any generalizations about the
common human experience?