However, where an employer prematurely claims frustration of the employment contract and terminates the employment relationship on that basis, the employee will be found to have been wrongfully dismissed, and will be entitled to
common law reasonable notice as well as damages for a breach of the Code.
Not exact matches
Nemeth argued that the motion judge had erred in finding that the contract excluded the right to claim
common law reasonable notice, and that the termination clause was void,
as it purported to contract out of the minimum statutory entitlement to severance pay.
Until fairly recently, these principles have been interpreted
as requiring termination provisions that specifically oust the
common law right to
reasonable notice, provide employees with continued benefits, and address entitlements to severance pay.
At
common law,
as long
as a probationary employee is given a fair opportunity to demonstrate his or her suitability for long - term employment, an employer will be able to terminate the employee's employment at any time during the probationary period without providing
reasonable notice or damages in lieu.
There is a presumption that an employee terminated without cause is entitled to
common law reasonable notice, which is an assessment of factors such
as age, length of service, availability of similar employment and character of position, and can result in a
notice period
as long
as twenty - four (24) months.
If the Code did not exist, employers could, under
common law, dismiss non-unionized employees at any time,
as long
as they provided
reasonable notice or pay in lieu of
notice.
Uncertainty is inherent in the calculation of
common law reasonable notice, which is not calculated using a set formula, but is instead calculated with regard to factors such
as the employee's age, length of service and compensation, the character of his or her employment and the availability of alternate employment.
The parties do not have to literally state that they have «agreed to limit an employee's
common law rights on termination»
as long
as their intention to displace the entitlement to
common law reasonable notice is evident.
As such, although dismissed probationary employees are typically not entitled to
reasonable notice at
common law, they are entitled to their termination entitlements pursuant to the ESA.
[51] The
common law entitlement to
reasonable notice of termination has been described by the Supreme Court
as a «necessary consideration» of an employment relationship: Machtinger, at p. 1024.
One of those three is where an individual is terminated without cause and provided severance or
notice and in that case the adjudicator will determine in accordance with the relevant
common law principles
as to whether that package was just or
reasonable.