Even
the common theological point of view, which cut across denominational lines, was opposed by some.
Not exact matches
Theological liberalism has split one church after another — to the
point that the theologically liberal in different churches often have more in
common with each other than with the more orthodox in their own churches.
The fact that the practices comprising a
theological school and Christian congregations intersect in their
common interest to understand God brings out a further
point about the relation between the two.
A way to make this
point is to exploit two metaphors: We could think of questions about the communal identities and
common life of diverse Christian congregations as the lens through which inquiry about all the various subject matters studied in a
theological school could be focused and unified.
We would simply want to
point to him as a long accepted literary witness to the
common theological outlook of the patristic period on this and other vital
points.
This diversity is different from other epochs - for example, the time when a Princeton scholasticism dominated the 19th - century Protestant landscape, or even the recent period when neo-orthodoxy was at the least the
common reference
point for
theological debate.
The following facts support this belief: the participation of the churches in the
theological conversations of the ecumenical movement, which perforce have had to find their
common starting
point and
common vocabulary in biblical literature and theology; the growing body of specifically biblical theology, produced by the very vitality of fragmentary and monographic studies.
At what
point do the
theological affirmations of process theology decisively differ from the
common - sense beliefs of traditional Western culture and society?
A survey, necessarily brief, of the major codes of law in the Old Testament, their superficial characteristics, the general qualities which they hold in
common particularly as against other extrabiblical codes,
points of difference among the three major earlier codes, the ethical qualities and content of these three, and finally the central
theological motivation of all Old Testament law.
To this end we must first survey, necessarily briefly, the major codes of law in the Old Testament, their superficial characteristics, the general qualities which they hold in
common particularly as against other extrabiblical codes,
points of difference among the three major earlier codes, the ethical qualities and content of these three, and finally the central
theological motivation of all Old Testament law.
The
point to be insisted on here is that the
theological community is constituted not by teachers and learners but by these and the subjects of their
common inquiry.