Sentences with phrase «common things we've seen»

gman, you are using one fact and distorting it to something written in the Bible that has an ambiguous meaning, a common thing I see on here with Christians that try to prove their arguments.

Some of the most common things I see happing right after a child wakes are snuggling in bed with mom and dad, nursing or bottle feeding, and using screens (like an iPad or TV).

A need for hydrochloric acid supplementation is definitely one of the most common things I see in patients.

It's a common thing we see in today's day and age.

The common thing you see is that white guys like Asian girls, but why do Asian guys with white girls?

Mike this is a common thing you see in loan modifications.

The origin of canine behavioral problems is not always black and white, but one of the most common things I see with my in - home training clients is a lack of consistency.

Then, we can also help with the common things we see pets walk in the door for at any veterinary clinic — skin issues, ear issues, vomiting and diarrhea.

One of the common things we saw was bloat.

That's the most common thing we see.

Not exact matches

«We're not going to see a complete redo of Dodd - Frank, nor should we... We're going to see some sensible, pragmatic common - sense changes to eight years of regulation... Things won't happen in a dramatic way, but it will definitely happen.»

«The idea of taking the actual account number out of the flow... common sense says that's a good thing, especially in the light of the data compromises that we've seen,» said Visa CEO Charles Scharf at a payments conference last month.

She's seen startups at all stages - from seed stage to public, and knows a thing or two about what great companies have in common.

On the surface, these three have nothing in common, but when you get past their external differences, you see they share one thing.

Check out these four common reasons to change careers to see if it's the right thing for you.

In my experience and seeing wonderful marriages and train wrecks, one thing they all had in common was this; Money vs. again AMBITION & HARD WORK WILL EARN CASH BUT OF YOUR «LOOKING FOR A SUCKER W / MONEY», TRUST ME THEY NEVER GOT THE $ $ Because they were simply A SUCKER!

Here are a few common «lack of focus» examples I see amongst founders all the time: — Doing shit that makes them look busy, but doesn't have significant impact — Trying to do too many things instead of one thing really well — Getting things done themselves instead of taking time to build the team — Fundraising when it's not time — Acquiring users when existing ones keep churning — Adding features instead of fixing or removing the ones they have — Having multiple audiences, rather than one very targeted — Paying attention to vanity metrics or too many metrics instead of core KPIs — Following the competition's every move — Obsessing with getting up on TechCrunch (or other press)-- Attending multiple networking events a week

Maybe these things are common knowledge among those in Evangelical circles, but for many like me on the outside, when we see a certain pastor or denomination singled out in this way, it looks a lot like the same internal striving that's been going on in the Church since Peter and Paul argued over circumcision.

One thing that is common in EVERY SINGLE FORM: the abuser doesn't see anything wrong with what they have done.

The need to belong is a common reason that people tend to overlook things that should raise red flags; the social cost of «seeing» is too high.

This is the sort of thing Paul would've seen in his travels; it was common practice in Ancient Rome.

«In those times, we knew about things that have become common today: the reality of abortion, of people who manifest homosexual tendencies, whose personal dignity we always respected, but we were formed to see these acts as absolutely unacceptable, against the nature that God had created for us.»

We've seen the positive and the negative things they had in common.

We're looking at things they had in common, and we've see the positive, now let's look at the negative.

I suggested that this would be an ecumenical effort since I thought by presenting the work of John Howard Yoder to Catholics and Lutherans I would help them see they shared much in common — namely, that Catholics and Lutherans had always assumed it was a good thing to kill the Anabaptists.

One thing Atheist have in common with God, we enjoy seeing Christians» head spin trying to make sense of the Bible.

Against this view, Iris Murdoch and others have used the insights of psychology and literature to focus on the common experience in which two people looking at an event see totally different things going on.

Regarding Scripture, I think what is vital for us today, as in all prior ages of God's saints — is the need to recognize these truths as «spirit and life» to us — to understand that God has indeed seen fit to speak through «common» things — written scripture, the communion, the «natural» majesty of creation and, ultimately, in the person of His Son — to reveal to us His character and purpose.

I can see that, but as you posted, «I would agree that Hitler and Ayn Rand would probably find many things in common in a casual conversation».

The one thing I see very clearly is that Ayn Rand has more in common with L.Ron Hubbard in the matter of «followers» than Jesus and his «followers».

Ever since the Reformation there has been a dispute among exegetes over the central word of this phrase, but today a way towards a common interpretation seems to be opening up once more -LSB-...]: «Faith is the hypostasis of things hoped for; the proof of things not seen».

Learning to allow, to «see» God's will in the most common things of life — to truly live «Corum Deo» — that's where «maturity» begins, and that's, no doubt, why we often fall short.

Highlights for me included: 1) Belcher's call in Chapter 3 to find common ground in classic / orthodox Christianity (the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed) which, if applied, would dramatically reduce some of the name - calling and accusations of heresy that have been most unhelpful in the discussion between the emerging and traditional camps, 2) Belcher's fabulous treatment of postmodernism and postfoundationalism in Chapter 4, where he rightly explains that when talking about postmodernism, folks in the emerging church and the traditional church are using the same term to refer to two completely different things, and where he concludes that «a third way rejects classical foundationalism and hard postmodernism,» and 3) Belcher's fair handling of the atonement issue in Chapter 6, in which he clarifies that most emergering church leaders «are not against atonement theories and justification, but want to see it balanced with the message of the kingdom of God.»

Kierkegaard sees that «purity of heart is to will one thing», to use the title of one of his meditations; but he does not fully see that purity of heart requires responsible participation in the common life.

It's the first effect of not believing in Cot that you lose your common sense and can't see things as they are.

You can say that you have a father and I would be inclined to believe you because having fathers is a very common thing, but I would not know that you have one until I see the evidence of having met him, for instance.

So often I have seen in other churches and pastors the common practice of mixing just enough of triumphalism and ambition, manipulation and coercion, rules and regulations, to make the thing work and succeed.

But we who are aware of the deep interconnectedness of all things, notice how the true wellbeing of one part of creation supports that of others, and we are led to see how policies that reduce pressure on resources and defend the commons also give opportunities to the poor to survive and even prosper.

I've never tried golden syrup as it's not as common here in the US, but I've been seeing a lot of recipes with it on European blogs and this may just be the thing that gets me to finally buy it.

For the women I see in my clinic some the most common things they present with are weight gain, low mood and poor sleep.

This is a ROOKIE poster mistake, common to FIRST year posters, i.e., failing to see there's more than one way to look at things.

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

Whenever I visit this site, my aim is just to have fun with everyone here, irrespective of the fact that we don't see things from a common perspective.

But thank God for a few good sports journalists and commentators who saw things exactly as I did and for that I am grateful and happy that at least some with common sense spoke out in my support.

Let Arsene go and all hell breaks will loose — suddenly the perfect scapegoat is gone and unhappy fans won't see a new manager as a common denominator as they see Arsene now but the man who sits on piles of cash disinterested in results on the pitch which is the only thing most of football fans care about.

You don't see the things others don't, comparing every player who stubs his toe to Diaby isn't realism or intelligence, it's stupidity, and the reason you're often on the side contrary to common opinion is you disrespect the team and our players constantly mainly to due with figments of your imagination and unfounded predictions based on absolutely nothing at all.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

If things like this become common place, it will see Sanchez head for the exit a lot quicker, especially if his team mates begin to become further disillusioned by his behaviour.

As different as these two views seem to be, they have one thing in common: They both focus solely on what they want to see, disregarding the complexity and intensity of motherhood, and the way in which it transforms a woman and her crystal heart.

Comparisons to «how things used to be`are common and to actually do those comparisons can be shocking for students to see how, really, little «progress «has been made especially in terms of gendered marketing of toys.