Not exact matches
Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so
common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate
public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally
public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets
with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions
He also finished Tuesday's
Common Council session
with a reminder that the
public also has a chance to voice their
opinions.
The article also says that «
opinion with respect to the
Common Core has yet to coalesce,» and then kindly suggests to Core supporters that they «probably need to clarify their intentions to the
public if they are to keep their support from slipping,» as if the opposition is based on a particular set of misunderstandings.
Perhaps the two most obvious reasons are: 1)
public opinion drives political actions in state legislatures, such as repeal efforts and efforts to adopt new assessments outside the
Common Core - aligned consortia, and 2)
public opinion likely affects schools» implementation, as politically active groups involve themselves in school board meetings, contact teachers directly to express their concerns, and «educate» parents
with information or misinformation.
Because the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the driving force behind the
Common Core and its unfair, inappropriate and expensive
Common Core Testing Scheme, along
with one of the companies that will profit most from the implementation of the
Common Core, have a new
public opinion survey showing that
public school teachers love the
Common Core.
With the push for development of longitudinal data systems during the pit of the Great Recession, many issues surrounding the
Common Core State Standards Initiative and its «next generation» tests were not fully vetted in the arena of
public opinion partially because it became a «best practice» to «not engage in large scale, open forums.»
The fundamental problem
with Hannah - Jones» argument is highlighted in the final paragraph of her
opinion piece: «If there is hope for a renewal of our belief in
public institutions and a
common good, it may reside in the
public schools.
As I wrote in my letter to L.A. Weekly, his position is at odds
with the relevant science,
public opinion, and
common sense.