First of all, the 140 character message limitation puts a severe constraint on any kind of meaningful
communication in a business context.
Not exact matches
There are many different ways to look at
communication in the small -
business world — from the individual formats such as writing and speaking, to different
contexts such as client
communication and employee management.
Walsh says: «Employing technology to improve
communications can give a competitive edge, however, any implementation has to be seen
in a wider
context as without the correct back - up and
business continuity planning, these advances may be counterproductive as they open up law firms to unnecessary risks.»
It could be argued that the TOS of social networks are having a very different impact on
business communications than personal
communications and this impact would not likely involve restricting civil liberties
in the same
context that my post addressed.
Most Canadian law firms — even more than Canadian
businesses in general − have what Bhasin describes as a «white - Canadian - malecentric» culture: low - hierarchy, direct low -
context communication, individualistic.
You're largely correct, except Seidel v. TELUS
Communications Inc. should also be understood
in the
context of B.C.'s
Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act and the split Court's factual determination of a need for access to justice.
While I think that applying a «
communication by telecommunication» copyright breach analysis is an interesting though experiment
in the
context of online court records, I'd be careful of implying that a Canadian court has said that «government should not be
in the
business of publishing public documents -LSB-...] government is simply required to make such documents available.»
And only with effective
communication can we get everyone on the same page: clients have visibility into the work that is performed, lawyers have insight into what they are doing
in the
context of the matter, and both law firms and their clients are better able to manage the
business of law.