The research was carried out to examine the links between
community ownership of land and development of associated assets, and the resilience of those communities.
Not exact matches
It is
of great importance that profits from
land ownership belong to the
community rather than being appropriated by private citizens.
Land trusts are typically community - based nonprofit groups that protect land by acquiring the land outright, or by entering into legal agreements called conservation restrictions, where landowners do not give up ownership, but instead agree to reduce the development potential of their land, generally in return for cash payment, tax advantages, or b
Land trusts are typically
community - based nonprofit groups that protect
land by acquiring the land outright, or by entering into legal agreements called conservation restrictions, where landowners do not give up ownership, but instead agree to reduce the development potential of their land, generally in return for cash payment, tax advantages, or b
land by acquiring the
land outright, or by entering into legal agreements called conservation restrictions, where landowners do not give up ownership, but instead agree to reduce the development potential of their land, generally in return for cash payment, tax advantages, or b
land outright, or by entering into legal agreements called conservation restrictions, where landowners do not give up
ownership, but instead agree to reduce the development potential
of their
land, generally in return for cash payment, tax advantages, or b
land, generally in return for cash payment, tax advantages, or both.
«The sense
of alienation
of Niger Delta indigenes from the resources
of their
land will continue until there are affirmative actions that guarantee the involvement
of these
communities in the
ownership and participation in the oil and gas industry.
DAILY POST learnt that trouble started when one
of the newly installed chiefs from Numaye
community claimed
ownership of a particular portion
of land which according to sources was not part
of Numaye riverine
community.
He pointed to the support his office has offered to
land banks, which battle blight by allowing
communities to take
ownership of dilapidated properties.
These 16 solutions were divided up between governmental, business and individual initiatives and the options ranged from more inclusive zoning, to repurposing
community housing
land, to developing a living wage, to giving up on the idea
of home
ownership altogether.
As its title implies, the exhibition addresses the concept
of ownership — both literally and figuratively — and the notion
of «reclaiming» what belongs to a person and their
communities, from their
lands and governments to their physical bodies and basic human rights.
As the elected president
of the
community of Agua Caliente, Tot brought documents showing Q'eqchi
ownership of land to the government and petitioned for
land titles.
The team spent years preparing its case to establish the
community's legal claims to the
land, including a geographical study
of Agua Caliente and the
land's chain
of ownership.
Represented
community group through trial and appeals process in a dispute over
ownership of cottages built on
land owned by a town
It could also provide proof
of land ownership in rural
communities and could be used to provide digital identities for example.
Such negotiations must aim to cover the types
of services, plans, and support that Indigenous
communities will require to be able to achieve sustainable control and management
of Indigenous natural and cultural resources, as well as the
ownership, control and maintenance
of Indigenous
community lands».
Despite this, the potential to realise economic or home
ownership outcomes for Indigenous
communities has not been fully explored and there has been a lack
of government policy directed towards using Indigenous
land to achieve these outcomes within existing frameworks.
Similarly, the Prime Minister has given preliminary support to the Principles by endorsing home
ownership on communal
lands and «individual aspiration as a driving force for progress in all sections in the Australian
community».50 Such a perspective is inconsistent with research focusing on social capital, which argues that the erosion
of community and shared networks is undermining the progress
of society.
The Committee is concerned, despite positive developments towards recognising the
land rights
of the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders through judicial decisions (Mabo 1992, Wik 1996) and enactment
of the Native Title Act
of 1993, as well as actual demarcation
of considerable areas
of land, that in many areas native title rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments
of 1998 in some respects limits the rights
of indigenous persons and
communities, in particular in the field
of effective participation in all matters affecting
land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title
lands, particularly pastoral
lands.
As discussed in Chapter 3, sustainable home
ownership requires a stable and adequate individual income to service debt; access to financial institutions; and a strategy to address the high cost
of housing against the low value
of land in remote
communities.
Nor have the principles addressed the cultural context
of communities in terms
of communal
ownership of land and the economic benefits that can be gained from Indigenous
communities» strong connection to their
land through an ongoing and vibrant culture.
A key objective
of the NIC Principles is to increase Indigenous home
ownership on communally owned
lands in the Northern Territory this may include remote
communities on ALRA (NT)
land.
A reform process should instead aim to provide long - term clarity through changes that deliver improved Indigenous
land ownership, support the development
of local governance and allow
communities to meet their development needs.
The Minister for Families, Housing,
Community Services and Indigenous Affairs has said that another aim
of the reforms is to provide «greater economic opportunities (business investment and home
ownership) as a result
of resolution
of land tenure and
land administration issues».
[the] progressive resolution
of land tenure on remote
community - titled
land in order to secure government and commercial investment, economic development opportunities and home
ownership possibilities in economically sustainable
communities.
A table
of these
communities, including a brief description
of the
land ownership, is provided at Appendix 5 to this Report.
«While we have differing views within our
community on how to improve the variety
of special Indigenous
land tenures across Australian, we recognise that collective
ownership is inherent in Aboriginal custom and we believe in the fundamental importance
of securing that underlying
land title for future generations.»
Government policies need to be flexible to accommodate different types
of land ownership (for instance, communally - held native title
land or freehold
land granted under a
land rights regime) and to support the distinct development aspirations
of specific
communities.
The Committee is concerned... that the Native Title Amendments
of 1998 in some respects limit the rights
of indigenous persons and
communities, in particular in the field
of effective participation in all matters affecting
land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title
lands, particularly pastoral
lands.
But where it does apply it has led to some large areas
of land being returned to the
ownership of some Indigenous traditional owners and
communities.6
... Among indigenous peoples there is a communitarian tradition regarding a communal form
of collective property
of the
land, in the sense that
ownership is not centred on an individual but rather on the group and its
community.
The Bonner Report focused on the issue
of land ownership and how Aboriginal people could be provided with improved forms
of land ownership that recognised both the economic and cultural aspirations
of diverse Aboriginal
communities.
The Committee is concerned, despite positive developments towards recognizing the
land rights
of the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders through judicial decisions (Mabo, 1992; Wik, 1996) and enactment
of the Native Title Act
of 1993, as well as actual demarcation
of considerable areas
of land, that in many areas native title rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments
of 1998 in some respects limit the rights
of indigenous persons and
communities, in particular in the field
of effective participation in all matters affecting
land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title
lands, particularly pastoral
lands.
They are not usually representative
of those Indigenous groups that can not demonstrate traditional
ownership of areas covered by the
land council or NTRB, nor do they always have close ties to existing Indigenous
community service organisations.
despite positive developments towards recognising the
land rights
of the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders through judicial decisions (Mabo 1992, Wik 1996) and enactment
of the Native Title Act
of 1993, as well as actual demarcation
of considerable areas
of land, that in many areas native title rights and interests remain unresolved and that the Native Title Amendments
of 1998 in some respects limits the rights
of indigenous persons and
communities, in particular in the field
of effective participation in all matters affecting
land ownership and use, and affects their interests in native title
lands, particularly pastoral
lands.
Michigan's highest court has considered whether the government could, through a condemnation proceeding, shift
ownership of land from one private owner to another, on the grounds that the second owner was going to create a business park which would benefit the entire
community.