It plans to increase the visibility of
community sentences so offenders «pay back»; provide local crime data and online maps; set national minimum standards for neighbourhood policing; and dedicate funding for community safety.
Not exact matches
I did not mean to imply that pacifists of the messianic
community have consciously built upon liberal — humanistic pacifism (though my
sentence can be
so read — mea culpa), but only to point out what should be obvious to all: that the inroads pacifists of the messianic
community have made in Roman Catholic and Protestant mainline circles can be traced to a prior acceptance of liberal — humanistic pacifism by many in those circles.
= > Now, within the scientific
community it is a death
sentence to call that which is known to exist God or supernatural
so that which even science knows to exist is covered up with «we don't know» while all evidence to date confirms it is unknowable and remains
so to this day as man can not know the mind of God and mans ways are not God's ways.
This appears to contradict the claims made by David Hanson MP who, in 2008, said prison «is not necessarily the best route for less serious offenders» and
community sentencing «cuts the likelihood of re-offending on release, and in doing
so cuts crime».
MPs, like
so many before them who looked at the evidence, called for an increased use of
community sentences.
In one
sentence, The Grand Seduction is about the people of tiny Tickle Cove Harbor's attempt to seduce a doctor into staying in their
community so a petrochemical repurposing plant can built there and give the Harbor back their pride.
So the
community was stunned when the district leveled the educational equivalent of a death
sentence on the school.
And on your thread in reply to my comment you called acid rain damage deniers crackpots,
so there is a definitional difference here for sure.Your last two
sentences are key, as I think it would be part of Judy's case that the
community are really pretty terrible at that — to the point of being dogmatic, perhaps?
Entire careers can be devoted to developing more pedestrian - friendly
communities,
so a few
sentences here obviously won't suffice.
Even
so, it seems impossible to calculate the worth of those committing crimes, their victims, families, and wider
communities experience justice instead of a
sentence.
(ii) The matters to be dealt with are: - the aggravating and mitigating factors of the offence (not personal mitigation); - any statutory provisions relevant to the offender and the offence under consideration
so that the judge is made aware of any statutory limitations on
sentencing; - any relevant
sentencing guidelines and guideline cases; - identifying any victim personal statement or other information available to the prosecution advocate about the impact of the offence on the victim; - where appropriate, any evidence of the impact of the offending on a
community; - an indication, where applicable, of an intention to apply for any ancillary orders, such as anti-social behaviour orders and confiscation orders, and
so far as possible, indicating the nature of the order to be sought.
In this case the Supreme Court sat in a remote Aboriginal
community and the respondent was
sentenced in his own
community to imprisonment
so that the people in his
community would better understand these important principles.
A significant feature of this approach is empowering Aboriginal elders in the
community through the
sentencing process and by providing a safe place for victims of crime to be involved in the process, if they
so choose.