Sentences with phrase «company against its former employee»

Stephen Riden is featured in a November 14, 2011, Forbes story about a lawsuit filed by a company against its former employee for using a Twitter account after leaving the company.
Prosecuted a suit for a major sports apparel company against former employees involving claims of intellectual property theft and violations of non-compete clauses.

Not exact matches

From a journalistic perspective, anonymous sourcing is often helpful, if not necessary, to get access to sources (often employees or former employees) who otherwise wouldn't speak out of fear of violating non-disclosure agreements or retribution from the company they're speaking out against.
In a recent sworn deposition for a lawsuit against the company, Carmen Viramontes, a former Freedom Fidelity employee, said Cotroneo and a man named Giang Phan (he went by «Jimmy») co-owned the company.
«Uber's lack of security regarding its customer data was resulting in Uber employees being able to track high profile politicians, celebrities, and even personal acquaintances of Uber employees, including ex - boyfriends / girlfriends, and ex-spouses,» Uber's former forensic investigator Ward Spangenberg was quoted as saying under penalty of perjury in filings from a lawsuit is pursuing against the company.
«WrkRiot is considering legal action against a disgruntled former employee who has launched a slanderous campaign against WrkRiot and some of its employees via social media,» the post begins, going on to accuse the former employee of attempting to extort $ 50,000 from the company.
This is not the first instance of an established company taking legal action against a startup founded by some of its former employees.
Former employees have said they were sexually harassed and discriminated against at the company.
While this is not the first time an established company has attempted legal action against its former employees — in January, Tesla sued its former director of Autopilot for poaching people to join his new startup — this is the first time Waymo has taken such action.
Employment practices liability insurance, or EPLI as you may have heard it called, provides protection to companies who have employees against claims by current or former employees for things like discrimination, wrongful termination, or sexual harassment.
In January, Tesla filed a lawsuit against Sterling Anderson, a former director of the company's Autopilot program, saying that he broke his employment contract by trying to recruit Tesla employees to join a new self - driving car company.
He also has on - the - record quotes from former AMI employees talking about how the company would purchase stories in order to kill them and buy the silence of the person behind them — a practice known as «catch and kill» — or to use as leverage against celebrities.
Subscribe to the Afternoon Brief Trending Story: Napa Winery Files Lawsuit Against Former Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LSFormer Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, Employees for Allegedly Stealing Company Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LCompany Data A Napa Valley winery is suing three former employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LSformer employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, employees for allegedly deleting confidential company information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -Lcompany information from their work - issued computers after copying the information for personal use and retaliation... Today's News: An Interview with Paul Mabray, -LSB-...]
A former employee of a company co-founded by genomics pioneer J. Craig Venter has filed a lawsuit alleging gender discrimination against the firm's female employees — and alleging harassment by Venter himself.
The Gillette Company (Gillette) brought this action against four former employees (collectively, the «individual defendants») alleging that they misappropriated Gillette's trade secrets to develop a wet shaving razor for defendant ShaveLogic, LLC (ShaveLogic).
Here, from blogger Allison Hantschel, is a peroration against Conrad Black and David Radler, the former owners who left the company in this sorry state, that expresses how a lot of present and former STMG employees surely feel.
Acting (led by Paul McGrath QC) in the Commercial Court for a FTSE 100 company in claims of conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty against former employees and other individuals relating to the misappropriation of funds.
Won a jury trial in Massachusetts Superior Court on behalf of a real estate development company defending against a former employee's claim for millions of dollars of company profits.
Represented an aerospace coating manufacturing and systems integration company in a trade secrets case against former employees, resulting in a favorable resolution and judgment in favor of the client.
This action is being brought against Weyerhaeuser Company Limited on behalf of former salaried, non-unionized employees of Weyerhaeuser Company Limited and its predecessor MacMillan Bloedel Limited with respect to retiree benefits.
We are also well placed to assist in the event of a claim being brought against your company by former employees.
This action was brought against Weyerhaeuser Company limited on behalf of former salaried, non-unionized employees of Weyerhaeuser Company Limited and its predecessor MacMillan Bloedel Limited with respect to retiree benefits.
Legal efforts to stop Ringling Bros. from alleged mistreatment of animals began in 2000 when a group of animal welfare organizations, along with a former circus employee, brought suit against the circus and its parent company, Feld Entertainment Inc..
Secured a $ 3.3 million judgment against a former general manager of a division of a Fortune 500 motion control equipment manufacturer in an intricate employee embezzlement case involving the theft of more than $ 400,000 in company funds.
Advising a telecoms company on High Court litigation against former employees involving a high - value share dispute.
The decision by Mr. Justice Teare empowers lawyers for broker TFS Derivatives to use the social networking site to track down former employee Fabio de Biase as part of a suit brought against the company by investment manager AKO Capital.
After the charges against the company were announced by the RCMP, the company issued a news release that stated the «alleged reprehensible deeds» were by former employees who left the company long ago.
The practice's recent representations include: (i) CONMEBOL in connection with U.S. criminal investigations and prosecutions into allegations of bribery and corruption in the international soccer world; (ii) the Special Committee of Banco BTG Pactual S.A. («BTG Pactual») in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its former CEO and other bank executives, in which we found no basis to support the allegations against the Bank and its employees; (iii) two of the largest construction companies in Brazil in potential civil and criminal investigations and litigation involving the Petrobras bribery scandal (Lava Jato), the largest corruption scandal in Latin American history, involving allegations of over $ 2.5 billion in bribes and kickbacks; (iv) the Government of Brazil in a corruption matter involving former senior government officials and multiple jurisdictions; (v) the General Manager of one of the largest energy companies in Central America in connection with allegations of bribery in Guatemala; (vi) a Mexican high - ranking executive for Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. in connection with DOJ and SEC FCPA investigations against Wal - Mart; (vii) a large Argentinean oil company and its owner, one of Argentina's wealthiest individuals, in connection with high - profile DOJ and SEC investigations involving alleged FCPA violations to secure an extension of oil rights in an Argentinean oilfield; (viii) the United State's largest chemical and industrial products companies in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its Mexican subsidiary; (ix) the Rosenthal family, one of the most prominent families in Central America, in a number of related criminal matters; and (x) a senior executive of one of Venezuela's largest engineering companies in DOJ investigations into corruption and money laundering involving PdVSA.
A disgruntled former employee — or even an applicant you didn't hire — brings a legal action against your company.
Defendant sends out tens of millions of emails each day worldwide; nobody can be completely clean 100 % of the time. Obviously, Defendant doesn't oversee their employees very well, or there wouldn't be so many lawsuits against them. Defendant's own employees are suing them. However, I don't think Defendant as a company would have done or mandated this; rogue employees of the Defendant would have though. Defendant is responsible for their employees actions if they are acting on the company's behalf. Plaintiff can easily find existing or former employees of Defendant to see if this was standard practice, or not. I bet they can!
Perpetually troubled electric car startup Faraday Future filed a lawsuit on Monday against the company's former chief financial officer, Stefan Krause, alleging that he stole a number of trade secrets and improperly solicited employees to join him at a new startup.
In a complaint published yesterday, the company asked a Texas court to preemptively declare that Magic Leap did not discriminate or retaliate against Todd Keil, a former Department of Homeland Security employee who joined Magic Leap in 2015.
Bear in mind that «some companies or organizations have policies against saying a lot about a former employee except for dates of employment, salary, etc.,» she said.
Law firm Nichols Caster announced last week that former Domino's Pizza employees will be allowed to proceed with putative class action against the company for alleged background check violations.
Eden Prairie, Minn. — Following an original age discrimination lawsuit filed by five former employees in June 2000 against Supervalu, U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson recently ruled that additional former employees could become part of a class action lawsuit against the company.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z