Sentences with phrase «company growth rate»

Typically, the larger the overall company growth rate, the greater the percentage of salary increases, with all other expenses being relatively equal.

A new report from the city's Department of Small Business Services found that, over the last decade, women - owned businesses in the city grew by 43 %, outpacing the average company growth rate of 39 %.

Not exact matches

So special tax rates for smaller companies hurt economic growth rather than enhance it.

«The gig economy is typified by irregularity, meaning there is no job security and instead of having a boss who trains you and helps you improve, your performance is rated on a scale of 1 - 5 stars by strangers who have no understanding of your growth as a professional,» explains Scot Wingo, founder and CEO of Spiffy, a modern on - demand company.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

The Emeryville, California - based company claims a 10 - year annual growth rate of 18 percent and has a market presence in 17 countries across North America, Europe, and Asia, according to Clif Bar.

The PROFIT / Chatelaine W100 ranks female entrepreneurs by a composite score that considers the size, growth rate and profitability of the companies they own and manage.

Financial services company Balyasny Europe Asset Management performed best, with a three - year growth rate of 3,469 percent and $ 39.4 million in revenue in 2015.

Emanuel says it's no surprise given recent concerns about China's economy and the Fed's ability to raise rates, all coming alongside soft revenue and earnings growth from the biggest companies in the US.

There is reason to doubt that lower interest rates will close the confidence gap needed for Canadian companies to invest in growth, however, as Canadian Business columnist Kevin Carmichael wrote this morning:

In other words, even good news can be bad news for a company like Ecolibrium, which, despite the industry tumult, has racked up a three - year growth rate of 988.7 percent.

CEO Jeff Bezos says a lot of the company's expansion is happening overseas — the growth is costing more than it brings in for now, analysts say, but Prime membership means loyalty and investors should be happy at the retention rates of over 90 %.

Energy infrastructure stocks, such as pipeline companies Enbridge Inc. (TSX: ENB) and TransCanada Corp. (TSX: TRP), should continue to see growth no matter the rate environment, says Bushell.

The program, now in its 20th year, ranks companies based on their «entrepreneurial spirit, innovation, rapid revenue growth, and world - class achievements» over the preceding four years, with growth rate being the key consideration for where companies rank on the list.

Of course there is no right answer but it's a function of how much capital you have raised, your prospects for raising more capital in the future, your growth rate and your company's risk tolerance.

S&P data shows the non-financial companies in its rating universe grew capex by just 7 percent in the last 12 months, despite posting sales growth and EBITDA growth of 13.6 percent and 15.2 percent respectively over the same period.

«And in this low - rate and low - growth environment, you're getting a company with sizable yield and incremental growth on top of it.»

Being on the 30 Under 30 was an amazing experience and gave our company tremendous exposure that helped us continue our aggressive rate of growth.

Currently, the company is trading at about 25 times earnings and with a long - term earnings per share growth rate of about 15 %, its price - to - earnings to growth ratio — a metric used to value fast growing companies — is about 1.4.

With a five - year growth rate of more than 19,000 %, Pac - Van tops Inc.'s inaugural ranking of the 100 fastest - growing inner - city companies.

Founded in 2008, the company has seen an impressive three - year growth rate of 710 percent, under the leadership of CEO Delano de Windt.

While the average five - year growth rate among this year's Inc 500 was 1,933 %, the growth rate among VC - backed companies on the list was more than double that.

Led by CEO Jason Sauers, the company boasts an impressive three - year growth rate of 1,461 percent, but maintains an intimate corporate structure.

As I have written about before, the rate at which Americans start new companies has been on a downward trajectory since the late 1970s, driven by changing industry composition and the growth of multi-outlet businesses like Starbucks and Walmart.

The study compared the compound annual growth rate of a Family Index of 23 companies — in which at least 30 % of voting control belonged to a family with multi-generational involvement in the ownership or management — against 412 widely held firms over a 15 - year period (1998 to 2012).

With no paid advertising, the two - person team of Joe and Andrea Raetzer built a company that saw an average month - over-month growth rate of 37.5 percent since its first crate.

At No. 42 on this year's Inc. 5000, the tablet and computer maker for companies such as Groupon and LivingSocial has a three - year growth rate of 5,866 percent and 2014 revenue north of $ 6 million.

Given the low unemployment rate, anecdotal evidence from a variety of companies, and alternative measures such as the Atlanta Fed wage tracker showing stronger growth, wage growth may not be back at precrisis levels, but the trend over the past year shows wages are certainly headed in the right direction.

So far, no one is nipping at the company's heels, which explains why Bouchard can boast that his firm has posted an average compound annual growth rate of 41 % over the past six years, and has been profitable since the beginning.

What would happen if you began to think about your company's flow rate — the revenues, profits, growth, and service to your customers — in the same way?

The one holdout, meanwhile, isn't even an offering from Adidas, but rather a shoe from Under Armour (UA)-- whose sizzling growth rate has lifted the company to the No. 2 rank (behind Nike) in the sports apparel category in the U.S..

Since auto - parts companies have different avenues for earnings expansion, you want to see a business's growth rate exceed the growth rate of the industry, says Bonansinga.

One very important note: it's natural for companies, as they grow bigger, to start seeing their rate of sales growth go down.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

In return, those companies helped Lynx break into the top 100 of this year's Inc. 5000 for the first time, with three - year revenue growth rate of 3,740 percent.

Founded in 2008, the company's clients include massive global companies — undoubtedly contributing to its impressive growth rate of 811 percent since 2011.

Still, 80 % of analysts have a Buy rating on Valeant, and some argue the company is already funding innovation, just in a different form: «The company is effectively «outsourcing» R&D by acquiring companies with late - stage, early - growth assets instead,» writes Nomura analyst Shibani Malhotra.

Apple's wearables, which include AirPod earbuds and the Apple Watch, also grew strongly, according to CEO Cook, citing a 50 % growth rate over last year and comparing the business to a «Fortune 300» company.

The Cupertino, California - based company is expected to post a 25 percent surge in profit over the three months to March, slightly higher than the blended earnings growth rate on the S&P 500.

In 2015, the company topped Deloitte's Canadian Technology Fast 50, with a four - year revenue growth rate of 18,480 %.

The truth is your company's success and growth rate relies on many factors.

The Healthcare Reform Law, including The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and The Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, could have a material adverse effect on Humana's results of operations, including restricting revenue, enrollment and premium growth in certain products and market segments, restricting the company's ability to expand into new markets, increasing the company's medical and operating costs by, among other things, requiring a minimum benefit ratio on insured products, lowering the company's Medicare payment rates and increasing the company's expenses associated with a non-deductible health insurance industry fee and other assessments; the company's financial position, including the company's ability to maintain the value of its goodwill; and the company's cash flows.

Growth rate Another way to sort out Twitter's value is to project out its annual compound growth rate out five years or more, and then try to back out the company's present Growth rate Another way to sort out Twitter's value is to project out its annual compound growth rate out five years or more, and then try to back out the company's present growth rate out five years or more, and then try to back out the company's present value.

The company has also added more than 30,000 new customers in its DSS division so far this year, 42 % above the average growth rate, which will give revenue a boost.

That's a small, subjective sampling of opinion, but given the skyrocketing growth rates of both companies, it's probably representative of the larger whole as far as service providers go.

Even with good fundamentals and a powerful growth rate, the company's stock could fall under pressure if its private stakeholders decided to ring the register.

In 2017, the profitable company earned the No. 5 spot on the Inc. 500, with a 20,944 percent three - year growth rate.

Among so - called growth companies, the failure rate is even higher, according to a 2012 Harvard Business School study: About three - quarters of startups with venture backing fail.

Five new employees have joined the company, bringing its head count to 23, and it made the 2008 Inc. 500 with a three - year growth rate of 1,380 percent.

From 1997 through 2001, the median growth rate for companies that had less than $ 1,000 in seed capital was 846 %, compared with 953 % for companies that were started with more than $ 100,000.