Sentences with phrase «company has less money»

When a company's payout ratio is high, it tends also to mean the company has less money retained to weather the storms that come from time to time.

Not exact matches

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.

It's unclear why the company would need to raise so much more money less than a year after a previous fundraising round, Recode reports.

Airbnb doesn't need the money, Chesky said — whether for ongoing operations or for M&A (the company just completed another $ 1 billion funding round and has reportedly spent less than 10 % of the $ 3 billion plus in equity it has raised), resources aren't a limitation.

So happy, they may even be willing to take a pay cut to work for a dog - friendly company: a survey conducted by Modern Dog magazine revealed that 65 % of readers would take a job for less money if it meant they could bring their dog to work.

Yet the company has developed a competitive launch vehicle in less time and for less money than would have seemed possible.

While there have long been small players in the venture capital community who defied the stats and were able to attract some LP money, they tended to be relegated to the fringes of the industry, with less access to sizable funds and the buzziest companies.

To figure out what that would do, the ISP tracked what 92 public companies that already pay the 20 % rate (or less) did with their money from 2008 to 2016.

Overall, the pharmaceutical industry, biotech companies, and medical device makers have given less money directly to Hillary Clinton's campaign than they had to President Obama's by this time four years ago.

In the September 2016 Harvard Business Review article, researchers say people who work for a company that has been enmeshed in scandal make less money when they leave to work elsewhere.

But smaller firms, say, startup gaming and video streaming companies, would likely get cut out of the new mix, as they are less likely to have the money to pay for expanded access.

For instance, they'll be less happy and more stressed (which affects things like their productivity and creativity); they may quit on you (which will cost you and your company time and money); they may give you bad reviews or complain to HR (which puts your job in jeopardy); and you'll have trouble earning their respect, being viewed as credible, and getting them to listen to your opinions.

While it may seem like raising outside money would actually make it easier to build such a company, even that achievement is often out of reach for women: Less than 3 percent of venture capital goes to female CEOs.

A $ 23 - million construction - equipment and - supply company, Albany Ladder specializes in serving carpenters, roofers, and small - time contractors who've never borrowed money from a bank — much less established a history of responsibly repaying it.

This could help the company do a better job of targeting ads so that advertisers would pay more and have less reason to spend their money on Facebook.

The more money you save, the more company you can keep, and the less time you'll have to spend chasing down investors.

Lower U.S. rates would make overseas shelters far less attractive and encourage companies to bring the money home, potentially causing a surge in capital expenditure, says Khan.

Papa says drillers in two major shale regions have burned through their best assets, and shareholders are pressuring companies to spend less money.

It takes less money to start companies than it did 10 years ago and these VC's had seen the best deals get done by über - wealthy angels.

This new money means he will have to buy stocks in a company he is less keen on, and accordingly which will are likely to make lower returns.

If corporations could do what PBMs do, internally and for the same or less money, why would companies like Express Scripts exist at all?

Perhaps, investors would have been less interested in buying shares in a company that is not only losing money but also paying big premiums for other companies that are losing money.

A year after the bear market in crude began, oil companies have cut workers, are using fewer rigs and have less money to spend.

But it also means he has to sell the company to a bigger company or to shareholders for a lot more money than if he had raised less.

Why would you only buy things that were 65 % or less of NCAV where net current assets are mostly inventory, where the company lost money in 4 of the last 10 years, etc..

Having just left the employ of a company that seemed to promote only Catholics (one affiliated with Santorum no less), I have no great love for so long for seeing these people get any more money or power.

And if breast is best, and if insurance companies have to pay out less money for women and babies who successfully maintain a healthy breastfeeding relationship (this on the assumption that, in fact, breastfed babies and mothers are healthier and less at risk for a variety of chronic ailments or cancers)- wouldn't it be in their best interest to shell out a couple hundred bucks for help their working, nursing mothers maintain a breastfeeding relationship?

A spokesman said in an email that the company hasn't identified a trend in the U.S. toward people changing diapers less often, though it has observed parents trying to potty train their youngsters earlier to save money.

Spitzer's side countered that U.S. companies weren't hiring at home because people had less money to spend, stagnating the economy overall.

So if the Current Asset: Current Liability ratio is less than 1, chances are, the company isn't doing very well — they can't pay back all the money they owe with the cash they'll have on hand and will have to start selling long - term assets, or look at refinancing the company, in order to pay their short - term bills.

These changes have seen media and telecommunications companies making money and acquiring more properties, while the public receives less and less in return.

They followed me and I them a long time ago, but like you once I saw thier site I shied away from ordering for same fears as you, having taken chances with another such company that many have bought from and it was failure and stress, despite others success... I ended up donating the clothing being over it, it was no money out of my pocket it was a Xmas gift via a gift card, but no less upsetting.

More than 1 in 5 women — 22 % — say they wouldn't date someone who makes less money than them, according to a new survey of 3,000 singles across the U.S. from dating company Plenty of Fish.

Three pivotal school board members, who were elected less than three months ago on a platform of keeping the Minneapolis - based company in Hartford, said last week that their support for the experiment had withered during more than two months of negotiations over how much money EAI should receive from the district.

Bought this truck with 7800 miles on it and had 4 recalls in less than a year the factory bedliner in it is separating from the steel and everytiei take it to the shop and its supposed to be a work truck made tough that's a joke due to the manufacturer defects I have to miss using it on jobs to haul and if you ask for a loaner that is not included in the warranty so I have a ram that is causing me to lose money and the company wont give me a truck to use while its getting manufacturer defects fixed makes sense and well trading it in is a joke after you buy a ram they depreciate dramatically so trading it in will cost you so thought since they changed names maybe they would b better but 2 hours on the hotline about why no loaner for a working man and all I get is there is no loaner policy when your vehicle is in the shop even when it is their flaws!And what really ticked me off they wanted to patch the factory sprayed bedliner so I took it in and dropped it off we had a big hail storm and they left my truck out in it and they aren't responsible for that either and you pay 600 for a factory sprayed bedliner and its peeling up and they want to patch that spot instead of respraying the whole thing can u say cheap but they were more than happy to take my money when I bought it but they don't stand very tough in my opinion never had this many issues with my fords

The company defended its adoption of the agency plan, which was «designed to facilitate entry by a new retail competitor and to increase the diversity and health of retail booksellers, and we took these actions knowing that Hachette itself would make less money than before the adoption of agency.»

Earlier in the discussion I talked about how smart it would have been (still would be) for publishers to invest in companies making POD machines so there would be less waste of money, time, and trees.

John Sargent Speaks Out In a statement, Macmillan CEO John Sargent said that the company adopted the agency model for e-books «knowing we would make less money on our e book business.

Most companies barely turn a profit, much less have the money to constantly make updates and tweaks to its own operating system and firmware features.

It was the only kind of deal publishers would sign (for lots of good reasons, and some less less good reasons), but that did not make the economics stack up any better: the writing was on the wall back in July when rival subscription company Scribd culled a range of romance and erotica titles from its service because they were costing the company too much money.

Whether Dark Horse changed its strategy or someone misspoke, making all its comics available for $ 1.99 or less would have been a visionary move that broadened the audience and made more money for both the company and its creators.

If the stockmarket did not exist, people would be far less willing to put their money into a new company, because selling shares would be far harder.

In practise though, lenders aren't so keen on that scenario, they would rather have shareholders sharing the risk, and lending a less than 100 % proportion of the total of a companies finance means they are much more likely to get their money back if things go horribly wrong.

If the consumer were liable for fraudulent use of their card, people would use credit cards less and the credit card companies would make less money than they're making now just paying off fraud.

By the time our parents wanted to buy their first home, the home loans had changed to less money — if any — for a down payment through a commercial bank or mortgage company.

The less money a company is obligated to pay creditors, the less volatile the stock tends to be during market downturns and the more money it has to line your pockets.

You can make offers that you know are less than the company is worth if you're sure the other person will have to take that money from you, say if you know they can't run the company without you.

If those $ 2000 are «funny money» that you don't mind losing but would be really excited about maybe getting 100 % return in less than 5 years, well, feel free to put them into an individual stock of an obscure small company, but be aware that you'd be gambling, not investing, and you can probably get better quotes playing Roulette.

They are less volatile than stocks and the coupon payments are often higher than most dividends, so you don't have to place a good bet to make money on bonds, like you do when buying a company's stocks.

It would be a disadvantage to mutual fund companies to include it in retirement accounts because they would make less money per year on it.