Our exit strategy was to sell our company to a Fortune 500
company in the defense business.
Representing telecommunications
company in defense of litigation alleging breach of a sales commission agreement.
Representing board of directors of a public insurance
company in defense of three expedited shareholder injunction actions involving an unsolicited tender offer made by the company's majority shareholder.
Represented employees of a multi-state locksmith
company in defense of an indictment for mail and wire fraud.
Represented a major insurance
company in defense of claims brought by a national association of insurance agents before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia regarding alleged breaches of agency contracts.
Represented international chemical
company in defense of $ 75 million RICO claim relating to production and marketing of a chemical resin
Of the three investigations, Nixon Peabody attorneys were the primary counsel for
the company in the defense of an investigation by the Department of Justice relating to the company's Medicaid «best price» reporting.
Represented a foreign
company in defense of an action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to have an approximately $ 200 million UNCITRAL Rules arbitral award recognized and enforced under the New York Convention.
Serves as trial counsel for transportation division of Fortune 50
company in defense of unfair trade practices and contract claims.
Representing
companies in the defense and investigation of wrongful death claims in personal injury
Serve as local counsel in approximately 600 cases for an international flavors
company in defense of claims alleging lung injury due to exposure to butter flavoring.
Lead and managing counsel for global chemical
company in the defense of all asbestos personal injury and wrongful death actions filed in state and federal courts throughout Florida.
Andrew has been engaged by Fortune 100
companies in the defense of class action suits brought in state and federal courts throughout the country.
Represented national public utility
company in defense of environmental claims based on historic property usage.
While the Group routinely acts as insurance defense counsel representing insureds and P&I Club members, it also represents insurance
companies in defense of coverage claims.
Several global pharmaceutical
companies in defense of investigations by the Department of Justice, and in internal investigations.
Neil also has extensive experience representing
companies in the defense of complex mass tort litigation.
Defended clean energy manufacturing
company in defense of a lawsuit alleging misappropriation of trade secrets.
Likewise, we are national products liability counsel for Colgate - Palmolive Company, lead national counsel for The Coca - Cola
Company in defense of purported class actions challenging the allegedly deceptive marketing of vitaminwater ® beverages, and national counsel for State Farm in homeowners» coverage cases arising out of Hurricane Katrina and Storm Sandy.
Insurance defense focuses on matters of protecting the rights of insurance
companies in the defense of claims made by policyholders, typically as a result of a plaintiff filing a lawsuit against his or her insurance carrier after being denied an insurance claim.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the
Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on
defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Areas where positions are available: The aerospace and
defense company is hiring across its global network
in areas such as engineering, advanced manufacturing, engine assembly, field service, program management, quality and supply chain management.
In the Midwest, the
Defense Alliance works primarily with high - tech
companies that want to grow their business by selling to the military.
In its
defense, Gogo's no different than many other tech
companies.
She had worked for one of the biggest
companies in the country making $ 80 grand a year; she had worked on the Star Wars Missile
Defense system.
Guardtime, which has 150 employees and estimates about $ 23 million
in revenues
in 2015, is now among the world's biggest blockchain
companies, with clients around the world, including Lockheed Martin and the U.S. Department of
Defense.
Saudi Arabia's oil - rich monarchy is one of America's most important strategic partners
in the Middle East and a significant patron of U.S.
defense companies.
Saudi Arabia is one of America's key strategic partners
in the Middle East and a significant patron of U.S.
defense companies.
To accelerate its plans for global expansion,
in February Hitachi splurged nearly 260 billion yen on the railway and signaling units of Italian
defense and aviation
company Finmeccanica, marking one of the
company's priciest - ever acquisitions.
An executive for a French
defense giant that operates
in China said that safeguarding the
company's technology is important, but the effort is no barrier to his firm's success there.
Meanwhile, several major technology
companies have stood by Apple
in defense of digital rights and privacy.
The three
defense companies have also donated more money
in the 2018 election cycle than any other
company in the industry, according to a new analysis from the Center for Responsible Politics, which draws on the Federal Election Commission's latest political - candidate - contribution report.
In September, in the most worrisome setback yet for 1099 - reliant sharing - economy companies, a federal judge granted class status to Uber drivers, vastly upping the stakes on its legal defense and the likelihood it will have to settl
In September,
in the most worrisome setback yet for 1099 - reliant sharing - economy companies, a federal judge granted class status to Uber drivers, vastly upping the stakes on its legal defense and the likelihood it will have to settl
in the most worrisome setback yet for 1099 - reliant sharing - economy
companies, a federal judge granted class status to Uber drivers, vastly upping the stakes on its legal
defense and the likelihood it will have to settle.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations
in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand
in construction and
in both the commercial and
defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges
in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including
in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption
in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8)
company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes
in political conditions
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes
in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates
in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes
in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result
in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined
company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including
in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted
in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is
in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued
in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined
company, to retain and hire key personnel.
The U.S. Department of
Defense has already stopped selling mobile phones and modems made by the Chinese technology
companies Huawei and ZTE
in stores on its military bases, citing potential security risks.
The first thing that's changed is that Consumer Internet and Genomics are Driving Innovation at scale
In the 1950's and» 60's U.S. Defense and Intelligence organizations drove the pace of innovation in Silicon Valley by providing research and development dollars to universities, and defense companies built weapons systems that used the Valley's first microwave devices and semiconductor component
In the 1950's and» 60's U.S.
Defense and Intelligence organizations drove the pace of innovation in Silicon Valley by providing research and development dollars to universities, and defense companies built weapons systems that used the Valley's first microwave devices and semiconductor comp
Defense and Intelligence organizations drove the pace of innovation
in Silicon Valley by providing research and development dollars to universities, and defense companies built weapons systems that used the Valley's first microwave devices and semiconductor component
in Silicon Valley by providing research and development dollars to universities, and
defense companies built weapons systems that used the Valley's first microwave devices and semiconductor comp
defense companies built weapons systems that used the Valley's first microwave devices and semiconductor components.
In 2009, Daniel
Defense started manufacturing its own rifles and cold hammer forged barrels, becoming one of five
companies worldwide that make both.
Although the
Defense Department is buying this batch of supercomputers, it could eventually shift some of its computing to cloud computing,
in which case it would rent computing capacity from
companies like Amazon and Microsoft.
«It is possible that the acquisition of COL is the first step
in separating UTX into two entities: a Commercial Operation and a
Defense and Aerospace Group,» Howard Rubel, equity analyst at Jefferies, said
in a note last week as speculation about a deal being struck by the two
companies increased.
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings is an aerospace and
defense company located
in Wichita, Kan..
Reuters previously reported on Friday that Boeing was seeking approval
in Brasilia for a plan creating a new joint
company that excluded
defense operations.
Earlier
in May the
company launched its first - ever Spysat for the U.S. Department of
Defense.
Once considered largely an aerospace and
defense manufacturer, Boeing (ba) is now unquestionably a tech
company in its own right, says Ian Mortimer, comanager of the top - performing Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund.
In 2012, for example, then -
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that Iran was one of the most prolific hackers, targeting everything from government systems to
company networks.
He's graced the cover of Vogue Italy, and she's active on Snapchat and has come to the
company — and her husband's —
defense in interviews.
Under the NLRB determination, that
defense could potentially fall, leaving the central
company as a co-defendant
in a potentially extensive and expensive legal action.
The latest figures are another indication of a key trend
in modern IT, and one that's got traditional server makers — the Dells, the Lenovos (lnvgy), the HPEs (hpe) of the world — on the
defense: More big web - scale
companies are designing their own servers and having them made by contract manufacturers instead of buying name - brand servers.
Vivendi's
defense of its stake
in TIM came a day after Italian Industry Minister Carlo Calenda had described the French
company as being an «awful» investor
in TIM.
But the
defense contractor experienced a double whammy
in 2014 between falling oil prices (triggering cutbacks on energy projects) and the substantial withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, reducing the need for the
company's services there.
Shares of
defense companies tend to outperform the broader market when the United States takes military action
in the Middle East, history shows.