Sentences with phrase «company makes less money»

The social endeavors mean the company makes less money.

Software only companies make less money than a company that makes both.

Not exact matches

This makes you more of a trusted advisor and less of another sales - oriented company simply trying to make money off them.

«Contrarian companies do not simply follow the crowd or the quick buck but rather look for ways to make money where barriers to entry are lower and there is less noise,» says Bradley.

«They're willing to give you less capital than you might be able to rase in New York or San Francisco, but you find a lot of early stage companies that find ways to make money fast.»

«By making it less punitive for companies to bring back this money and making the process far less bureaucratic and difficult, we can return trillions and trillions of dollars to the economy and spur billions of dollars in new investments in our struggling communities and throughout our nation,» Trump said.

In the September 2016 Harvard Business Review article, researchers say people who work for a company that has been enmeshed in scandal make less money when they leave to work elsewhere.

In all of the above cases the entrepreneur who is susceptible to the confirmation bias will look for information and analyze it in a way that will yield: 1) fewer competitors rather than more, because it increases the viability of the start - up, 2) underestimation of the capabilities of the competition because stronger competitors will make life harder for the entrepreneur, 3) view of the company's product as fully addressing the needs of the customer because otherwise the start - up is at a weaker position in the marketplace, and 4) need for less resources rather than more because it generally makes raising the money easier.

Currently, they pay less than developed countries for drugs, so companies don't make as much money there.

While it may seem like raising outside money would actually make it easier to build such a company, even that achievement is often out of reach for women: Less than 3 percent of venture capital goes to female CEOs.

Lower U.S. rates would make overseas shelters far less attractive and encourage companies to bring the money home, potentially causing a surge in capital expenditure, says Khan.

This new money means he will have to buy stocks in a company he is less keen on, and accordingly which will are likely to make lower returns.

One, customer tastes are changing and while certain companies are certainly flexing to move to those changes, it costs money and splits their product lines making them less efficient.

Less than 2 % of the world's money is invested by women and the average make - up of female investors in private companies is around 22 %.

«Unfortunately (women) may be less powerful and make less money and run fewer companies, but they're not less important, and they may be more important because they're the soul and well - being of our communities.»

Demanding plans for power cuts: In the US, electricity companies make money helping their customers to use less power.

Well, remember that the courtroom battle will often cost the offending company millions of dollars as well: It may be less expensive for them to just pay you a small license fee, rather than pay a lot of money trying to make you go bankrupt.

These changes have seen media and telecommunications companies making money and acquiring more properties, while the public receives less and less in return.

More than 1 in 5 women — 22 % — say they wouldn't date someone who makes less money than them, according to a new survey of 3,000 singles across the U.S. from dating company Plenty of Fish.

One strange night after he's confronted to one too many situation requiring him to be heartless and all about business, Maguire grows a conscience and writes a memo - sorry, a mission statement - inviting the company to manage less athletes, make less money, but be closer to the people.

And with a bank account overflowing with money from unknown, possibly illicit, sources, Wiseau's ignorance of the filmmaking process proves to be less a barrier than an opportunity for an equipment rental company to sell him a package deal, including a staff of filmmaking professionals less interested in making Wiseau's vision come to celluloid life than collecting a regular paycheck.

Bought this truck with 7800 miles on it and had 4 recalls in less than a year the factory bedliner in it is separating from the steel and everytiei take it to the shop and its supposed to be a work truck made tough that's a joke due to the manufacturer defects I have to miss using it on jobs to haul and if you ask for a loaner that is not included in the warranty so I have a ram that is causing me to lose money and the company wont give me a truck to use while its getting manufacturer defects fixed makes sense and well trading it in is a joke after you buy a ram they depreciate dramatically so trading it in will cost you so thought since they changed names maybe they would b better but 2 hours on the hotline about why no loaner for a working man and all I get is there is no loaner policy when your vehicle is in the shop even when it is their flaws!And what really ticked me off they wanted to patch the factory sprayed bedliner so I took it in and dropped it off we had a big hail storm and they left my truck out in it and they aren't responsible for that either and you pay 600 for a factory sprayed bedliner and its peeling up and they want to patch that spot instead of respraying the whole thing can u say cheap but they were more than happy to take my money when I bought it but they don't stand very tough in my opinion never had this many issues with my fords

The company defended its adoption of the agency plan, which was «designed to facilitate entry by a new retail competitor and to increase the diversity and health of retail booksellers, and we took these actions knowing that Hachette itself would make less money than before the adoption of agency.»

Earlier in the discussion I talked about how smart it would have been (still would be) for publishers to invest in companies making POD machines so there would be less waste of money, time, and trees.

John Sargent Speaks Out In a statement, Macmillan CEO John Sargent said that the company adopted the agency model for e-books «knowing we would make less money on our e book business.

Most companies barely turn a profit, much less have the money to constantly make updates and tweaks to its own operating system and firmware features.

It was the only kind of deal publishers would sign (for lots of good reasons, and some less less good reasons), but that did not make the economics stack up any better: the writing was on the wall back in July when rival subscription company Scribd culled a range of romance and erotica titles from its service because they were costing the company too much money.

«Authors are already getting a smaller cut when it comes to e-books and when you look at the music subscription services, it is the music companies who are making money and the artists who are getting less.

And these companies seem more and more willing to sell the devices for less money, in hopes that they can make their money back by selling a lot of content through the device.

Whether Dark Horse changed its strategy or someone misspoke, making all its comics available for $ 1.99 or less would have been a visionary move that broadened the audience and made more money for both the company and its creators.

Hi, I think old Buffett and Munger made money as you said, but they made so great that that they get bigger to make that decisions.Buffett some time 2000s that if you give me less money I will get 50 percent compounding.But I think long term investment is with High Roe companies, but beginners must make their money by special situation and deep value ones.

If the consumer were liable for fraudulent use of their card, people would use credit cards less and the credit card companies would make less money than they're making now just paying off fraud.

You may find your risk is less once you install a system or you may save a lot of money with your insurance company by making the investment.

You can make offers that you know are less than the company is worth if you're sure the other person will have to take that money from you, say if you know they can't run the company without you.

They are less volatile than stocks and the coupon payments are often higher than most dividends, so you don't have to place a good bet to make money on bonds, like you do when buying a company's stocks.

It would be a disadvantage to mutual fund companies to include it in retirement accounts because they would make less money per year on it.

Depending on the bank and the requirements of the insurance company you are dealing with, unauthorised suites may present a problem and actually make it difficult for you to get approved for the mortgage because your lender may refuse to take into account money generated by the suite, thereby making you less qualified for the loan you desire.

He made a lot of money in certain shorter term investments, but even the cheap stuff like the insurance company he bought for a P / E of less than 1 were higher quality businesses with a history of profits.

For example, someone who gains less money in interest on her savings account than she anticipated might be more conservative when making purchases, resulting in decreased profits for consumer - oriented companies.

I often had feeling that the 401Ks were made only to save companies funds — forget about tying up money in a retirement plan, as well as less management reporting charges — allow 401K fund charge, along with the worker pay the 401K.

This married finance and travel for the company to save money and make employee travel less stressful.

The ones who score highest on safety make less make less money for the company... and then you've got these Feds coming in with «CSA 2010», making it even more complicated.

Rocky Mountain Institute is a non-profit organization that fosters the efficient and restorative use of resources so that companies, govenrments, and organizations are more efficient, make more money, and do less harm to the environment.

The less energy their customers use, the more money the company makes, which enables Inspire to offer customers rewards for the energy - saving actions they take.

This, to my mind, is the ideal approach — consumers are better off (use less fuel, and pay no more for the benefit) companies are OK (can still make money) and CO2 reduces.

So a lack of a pipeline means that oil companies are making less money than they would if a pipeline existed.

[Ned Breslin from Water for People] is less concerned about corporations going overseas looking to buy control of water — he thinks water companies have realized not much money is to be made in doing that, and they are more interested in management contracts than outright ownership — but the bigger question might be allocation of water resources, which until now has been sort of a free - for - all.»

Remember, the insurance companies make money when they pay out less claims so even if you are their customer they'll want to avoid paying the claim if possible.

The answer may be one of two things: 1) Your employer may not be aware of the difference between the two types of benefits OR 2) Your employer could be trying to pull the wool over your eyes — by having you make a claim under your personal STD policy (remember YOU pay for this and it is usually much less money and no medical benefits), instead of filing a claim for workers» compensation benefits against the company's insurance policy (the policy the employer pays for) it saves the company money (filing a claim will increase their premiums).

The companies are making a lot of money and people are getting less benefits... to be perfectly honest, I don't know how you're going to fix Ontario.