Bhakta recommends that entrepreneurs put into the contract that if a minority shareholder brings a lawsuit against a majority shareholders, that
the company pays the legal fees.
Occasionally, venture funds will try to have
the company pay legal fees even if the financing does not close.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8)
company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of
legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined
company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to
pay a termination
fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined
company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Legal fees were
paid with
company shares instead of cash.
The
company would have to file a notice with the regulatory department;
pay a registration
fee of $ 250; provide evidence of registration with FinCEN as a money services business; agree to not invest or pledge virtual currency in its custody or control on behalf of others or to engage in the exchange or transfer of
legal tender; and prove its policies for reporting, disclosures, and compliance.
The campaign also
paid legal fees to the Trump Corp. — a
company being run by Trump's two older sons — and law firms Belkin, Burden, Wenig & Goldman LLP; Schertler & Onorato LLP; Seyfarth Shaw LLP; and Van Hoy, Reutlinger, Adams & Dunn PLLC.
With this coverage, your insurance
company would cover
legal defense
fees and can
pay damages if you're found to be liable.
Venture funds do not want
legal fees to be
paid from management
fees and instead want them
paid from the fund itself, via the portfolio
company.
B.C. taxpayers can't afford these sorts of sweetheart deals in a time of austerity, especially when the Minister of the Environment admitted that the
fees paid by Nestle and oil and gas
companies likely wouldn't even
pay the government's bill for administration related to the
legal changes.
Once adopted and assented to, CAMA will ensure that small and medium scale business - owners, or prospective business owners, will be able to bypass the
legal fees (that usually start at about N70, 000 +) that they
pay to lawyers to register their
companies at the Corporate Affairs Commission.
However, none of the charges U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara has leveled against the two men pertain to campaign donations, though Mr. Silver stands accused of pressuring Glenwood into hiring a law firm that
paid him
legal fees while Mr. Skelos faces allegations that he used his position to obtain a sinecure for his son at a
company Glenwood held stock in.
With this coverage, your insurance
company would cover
legal defense
fees and can
pay damages if you're found to be liable.
When investors enter into an option agreement they may also have to
pay legal fees, commission payments and payments to the development
company that may not be refunded if a sunset clause is triggered.
To prevent
paying an absorbent amount in
legal fees, make sure you work with
companies like Bankruptcy Attorney Nation.
Also like Percy Schmeiser and hundreds upon hundreds of other farmers, if GM seed enters your property it is likely you will be taken to court and once the
legal power of a GM
company is brought to bear it is more than likely you will lose... you will then have to
pay the GM
company and its attorney
fees and all related court costs.
Brand owners have found themselves in protracted
legal proceedings, which have historically tended to favour Chinese
companies and individuals, leaving global brands to
pay significant
fees to acquire marks filed in bad faith.
This is because the law takes into account you need to
pay your lawyer 1/3 of the settlement, and therefore, the insurance
company should also bear the costs of
legal fees and expenses incurred to obtain the settlement.
Why
pay Big Law's
legal fees to incorporate your
company?
His extended note begins, «A possible explanation for the lower profits per partner in the U.K. is that clients in the U.K. are more sophisticated, demanding, less willing to
pay high rates, and more insistent on budgets... If U.K.
companies spend less proportionally on
legal fees, there's less money to go round...»
In the recent Hoang v The Personal Insurance Co., 2017 ONSC 4193 (CanLII) case, the Court ordered the insurance
company to
pay full indemnity costs (all
legal fees) where the insurance
company had wrongfully denied coverage.
The insurance
companies pay all the
legal fees as well as any settlement on the defendant's behalf.
Without the option of «no win — no
pay» contingency
fees, few victims would have the means and ability to challenge the big insurance
companies in a
legal battle with upfront
legal payments.
On a purchase, the
legal fee is, except for first time buyers who may not
pay any LTT, far less than the LTT, less than the moving
company, less than a new fridge.
Our clients include major corporations, government agencies, law firms, insurance
companies, and anyone else who
pays substantial
legal fees, needs to examine the reasonableness of
fees, or wishes to analyze litigation issues.
There's no doubt that the widening gap between
legal fees (expected to exceed # 1,000 per hour this year in top London firms) and the price most
companies can afford to
pay, makes the profession ripe for «Uberisation», or transformative change.
Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online
legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising
fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may
pay flat
fee to internet marketing
company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are
paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service -
legal directory, provided there is no
fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may
pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license,
fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for
legal services in exchange for flat annual membership
fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may
pay internet advertising service
fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.
The
legal fees are
paid by the insurance
company, because it's more efficient to
pay lawyers than to
pay false or fraudulent liability claims.
This simply means that if the insurance
company spends $ 50,000 in
legal fees to defend or settle a claim against you, that money is separate and apart from the limit of money available to
pay the claim against you.
That means the insurance
company will lawyer up on your behalf,
paying the
legal fees for your defense against the claim.
So your insurance
company would
pay for those costs, potentially including your
legal fees.
With renters insurance, your rental
company will
pay for any medical expenses and well as any
legal fees that arise from the incident.
In particular, patent trolls continue their deplorable business model of buying up patents and using the threat of litigation to force
companies — frequently startups — to
pay up or face ruinous
legal fees.
Usually, manufacturers don't provide the unlock code for handsets unless you
pay a HUGE
FEE ($ 100 +), but a couple
companies like us have special access to the HTC Sim unlock codes.The codes we provide are DIRECTLY FROM HTC and 100 %
legal.
The proposed law would require the loser in a patent lawsuit to
pay the winner's
legal fees, stop the plaintiff from demanding documents from the defendant until the court has interpreted the patent, and crack down on shell
companies.
If there's a $ 100 million stolen in a breach (excluding somewhat predictable
legal fees, investigations...) the maximum amount the insurance
company can
pay out is $ 100 million.
In another previously unreported complaint filed on November 29th, the law firm Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is suing the car
company for allegedly failing to
pay $ 162,881.53 in
legal fees.
Between the previous $ 4.5 M settlement with the federal government and this new $ 1.25 M settlement with the state of California, Fidelity and its
companies will
pay almost $ 6M, not including
legal fees and other costs.