Sentences with phrase «company policy administration»

Not exact matches

When asked if the Trump administration's policies affected Toyota's decision, a company spokesperson told the New York Times they had not.

The question now is, what will the Trump administration — famously critical of companies moving overseas — do about the ruling and general policy?

Standing up against the immigration ban — or any other Trump policy — could risk upsetting an administration that has not been shy about lashing out against companies that don't toe the line.

How Trump Administration policies, specifically tax reform, will affect the company.

While we would not comment on any member's personal decision, there's no change in Dell engaging with the Trump administration and governments around the world to share our perspective on policy issues that affect our company, our customers and our employees.

The China - specific tariffs are a response to what the Trump administration calls intellectual property theft, via technology transfer policies that require companies to share technology with Chinese firms in order to do business in China.

Until recently, Cramer felt there had been a notion among investors that companies should wait for the Trump administration to implement tax or regulatory policy before making acquisitions.

This could be seen as attempting to thwart the policy of a president who has frequently excoriated specific companies by name, and whose administration will powerfully influence the regulation of healthcare.

«The Administration should not respond to unfair Chinese practices and policies by imposing tariffs or other measures that will harm U.S. companies, workers, farmers, ranchers, consumers, and investors.»

The Investment Company Institute, meanwhile, expressed its «deep concern» that the administration is pursuing «policies that could fragment and undermine our nation's voluntary retirement system for private - sector workers.»

«People tend to confuse what the government can do with what these individual companies can do,» said Karen Kornbluh, a senior fellow for digital policy at the Council on Foreign Relations and former ambassador to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development under the Obama administration.

As the president of a steel company, David Zalesne said some of the Trump administration's economic policies are probably going to be good for his industry.

In the George W. Bush administration, changes in accounting regulations and Federal policies made granting of broad - based stock options and restricted and other stock grants to employees in high technology and other companies less attractive, which led to a huge drop in employee share ownership among the middle class in those companies and industries.

The Trump administration sounds serious about punishing the Chinese government and Chinese companies that allegedly have benefited from years of intellectual property theft and forced technology transfer policies.

On the other hand, according to the Measures for the Administration of Securities Investor Protection Fund 《 證券投資者保護基金管理辦法 》, the functions of China Securities Investor Protection Fund (CSIPF, 中國投資者保護基金) include «indemnifying creditors as required by China's relevant policies in case a securities company is subjected to compulsory regulatory measures including dissolution, closure, bankruptcy and administrative takeover by China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and custodian operation» or «other functions approved by the State Council».

The United States» chief trade representative, Robert Lighthizer, who testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, indicated that the administration was specifically concerned about Chinese policies that compel American companies to share technology when they make investments in China.

All of the major companies there — Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft — have increased lobbying and policy operations in Washington since the 2016 election to deal with a Republican - controlled Congress and the Trump administration, whose policies tend to run counter to the tech industry's stances on immigration and other issues.

«Companies and the market in general are not clear on trade and regulatory policy of the new administration.

Tuesday's move left some analysts wondering whether the administration's goal is to persuade China to change the policies that are allegedly damaging U.S. companies or simply to shield an embattled Rust Belt industry from foreign competition.

Second row standing from left to right: F. Robert Salerno, President & CEO, Cendant Car Rental Group; Richard Wistrand, Senior Vice President & Chief Fossil Officer, TXU; David Rader, Senior Vice President Finance and CFO, Frito - Lay Division, PepsiCo, Inc.; Mirian Graddick - Weir, Executive Vice President, Human Resources, AT&T; Lisa Martin, Vice President, Global Sourcing, Pfizer, Inc.; Theo Fletcher, Vice President, Supply Chain Compliance, Security & Diversity, IBM Corporation; A. Shuanise Washington, Vice President Government Affairs Policy and Outreach, Altria Group, Inc.; Bruce Perkins, Vice President, Manager, Supplier Diversity and Business Development Group, Merrill Lynch; Joyce M. Wichie, Director, Supplier Diversity, Worldwide Purchasing, Eastman Kodak Company; Dick Anderson, Vice Chairman, Planning & Administration, BellSouth Corporation; John D. Hofmeister, President and Country Chair, Shell Oil Company; Robert McCormes - Ballou, Director, Vendor Diversity, Office Depot; and Michael L. Eskew, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, UPS.

Through the election of Bush and Cheney, the oil companies virtually took over the administration of the country pressing for policies that are in no way sustainable.

Although it is now clearly demonstrated that the most cost - effective step for most utility companies and industries is to invest in more efficient equipment so as to reduce the use of fuel, the energy policy of the Bush administration, supported by prevailing preferences among economists, gives only lip service to this approach.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association and its member companies are committed to working with the Trump Administration and Scott Gottlieb to help assure the safety of our food supply, strong science - based nutrition policies, and the integrity and effectiveness of food labeling policies.»

It must be stated emphatically that my wife's company never received a county contract, and was actually barred from doing so by the policy that my administration put in place.

A Queens assemblyman wants the New York pension fund to cut ties with companies that stand to benefit from the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies.

«When you look at the leadership and the scandals that have plagued the administration, and what that has done to some of the economic policy and initiatives across the state, it obviously causes pause for some of these organizations and companies,» Sen. Joe Griffo, a Republican from Rome, said during the press conference.

The organization had come under fire from good - government advocates over its receipt of large donations from companies lobbying City Hall, including more than $ 1 million from real estate developers, some trying to influence the administration's zoning and housing policies.

Many of those companies and individuals have business before the Cuomo administration — and they aren't just interests like those of charter school supporters that have a clear policy alignment.

Combination of economic trends and policies Still, for now an array of Obama administration actions and economic trends are conspiring to cut emissions, according to EIA: Americans are using less oil because of high gasoline prices; carmakers are complying with federal fuel economy standards; electricity companies are becoming more efficient; state renewable energy rules are ushering wind and solar energy onto the power grids; gas prices are competitive with coal; and federal air quality regulations are closing the dirtiest power plants.

In a statement responding to Golden Spike's announcement, a NASA spokesperson said: «This type of private sector effort is further evidence of the timeliness and wisdom of the Obama administration's overall space policy — to create an environment where commercial space companies can build upon NASA's past successes, allowing the agency to focus on the new challenges of sending humans to an asteroid and eventually Mars.»

The companies recognize that if they make no commitment to build a new plant, the Administration [and Congress] would continue to feed them with an ever - increasing sum of taxpayer - supported largesse [in the Energy Policy Act of 2005].

Anytime you or administration intends on using or integrating educational technology into the classroom, visit the website or complete a search on the privacy policy of the company.

February 27, 2018 • The Trump administration is considering a policy change to prevent states from making tough demands of companies that collect student loan debt, according to an internal document obtained by NPR.

«In August, the Malloy - Wyman Administration rightly responded to the crisis by ordering a thorough review of the department of education's policies governing charter management companies.

Policy Fee: A charge for policy administration expenses incurred by the insurance coPolicy Fee: A charge for policy administration expenses incurred by the insurance copolicy administration expenses incurred by the insurance company.

This interest is actually a dividend from the life insurance company's yearly profits, and the growth rate is generally low compared to other investments because life insurance companies have additional expenses (like policy administration expenses and underwriting costs) that a pure asset manager does not.

So they're not 100 % accurate, and we have to rely on our honerable administration (stop choking) or our honest oil companies (pass the kleenex) for setting policy... now that's a plan.

The administration's energy policies presume that central planners know better than private citizens and companies about how to create jobs and allocate capital.

Our recommendation is that we should abandon the sky - is - falling and phantom job loss tactic, and lobby the administration with several «asks,» that could include: MLP / REIT status for solar companies; fast - track permitting; reducing environmental studies; tax - free manufacturing zones in the interest of U.S. national security and to revitalize certain cities; a revision of accounting rules that penalize solar project owners; federal policy allowing net metering for homeowners and community solar projects; including solar in the upcoming infrastructure spending bill; and finally increased PV deployment on federal buildings.

One of the reasons the world is now running out of time to prevent dangerous climate change is because fossil fuel companies and their allies in the US Congress has prevented the United States from taking serious action on climate change since 1992 when the George H. W Bush administration agreed in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change that the United States should adopt policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference on climate change on the basis of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities.

To ensure that this issue continues to receive the highest level of attention, I direct: (1) relevant U.S. delegations attending meetings with Icelandic officials and senior Administration officials visiting Iceland to raise U.S. concerns regarding commercial whaling by Icelandic companies and seek ways to halt such action; (2) Cabinet secretaries to evaluate the appropriateness of visits to Iceland depending on continuation of the current suspension of fin whaling; (3) the Department of State to examine Arctic cooperation projects, and where appropriate, link U.S. cooperation to the Icelandic government changing its whaling policy and abiding by the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling; (4) the Departments of Commerce and State to consult with other international actors on efforts to end Icelandic commercial whaling and have Iceland abide by the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling; (5) the Department of State to inform the Government of Iceland that the United States will continue to monitor the activities of Icelandic companies that engage in commercial whaling; and (6) relevant U.S. agencies to continue to examine other options for responding to continued whaling by Iceland.

«We look forward to working with the Cuomo administration to build on this important first step and advance the regulatory certainty and business - friendly environment necessary for community solar companies to invest at scale in New York state,» said Hannah Masterjohn, CCSA Board Chair and VP of Policy & Regulatory Affairs at Clean Energy Collective.

Massachusetts» anti-fossil-fuel policies are the primary reason why the state has relied on LNG imports from a Russian company that the State Department sanctioned during the Obama Administration.

The companies have criticized the Obama administration for waging a so - called «war on coal,» arguing that the president's policies to curb emissions from power plants are harming energy companies and their customers.

The administration's policies stand in stark relief next to Exxon Mobil's recently announced discovery of an estimated 700 million barrels of oil in the Gulf's Keathley Canyon - hinting at reserves likely to be found elsewhere if government will simply let America's energy companies go and find it.

Today, we implore the politicians and companies who fought against the reckless energy policies of the Obama administration not to go against their previously stated free market instincts.

ARREA spokesman Rodd Pahl said the group believed «the behaviour of wind farm companies and the level of subsidies they are given is the result of bad policy settings and sloppy administration».

Around 1,000 jobs were lost last month as one of Britain's biggest solar companies went into administration — a direct result of the government's slash and burn of green policies.

Before Easongate, came Ketchumgate — a term that I (and other bloggers) have used to describe the situation in which communications company Ketchum paid commentator and syndicated columnist Armstrong Williams with tax dollars to advocate for Bush administration policies.

In 1990, the Law Society first arranged its own E&O policy through Lawyers» Professional Indemnity Company (then known as LPIC) and began handling the administration and funding of coverage for smaller claims.