Sentences with phrase «company proposing the pipeline»

But TransCanada, the company proposing the pipeline, said it «remains fully committed» to building.

But the fight is not over: incoming President Donald Trump, who previously held a direct financial interest in the gas company proposing the pipeline, put it back on the agenda in one of his first acts of office.

Not exact matches

The LNG Canada and Kitimat LNG projects, as well as a fourth plant proposed for the northern B.C. coast by Malaysian state energy company Petronas and Calgary - based Progress Energy, will likely have to wait for new pipelines to be built directly from the shale gas fields of northeastern B.C. Kitimat LNG's owners are separately developing the Pacific Trails pipeline to their terminal.

More immediately, Bay's exit leaves the commission unable to approve or reject natural gas pipelines or settle proposed mergers, including a $ 12 billion plan to unite Great Plains and Westar energy companies in the Midwest.

By capping oil - by - rail traffic in the province while the proposed panel goes over the spill science, the B.C. New Democrats squeeze off pipelines and companies» backup shipping plan.

As part of the discussions over Maryland's approval of the proposed $ 4.5 billion AltaGas / Washington Gas merger deal, Governor Larry Hogan's administration negotiated for the Canadian company to pay $ 103 million to kick start a natural gas pipeline expansion project in rural areas throughout Maryland, according to the Maryland Energy Administration.

The company warned then that it could cancel the proposed 4,500 - kilometre (2,800 mile) oil pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta, to Saint John, New Brunswick, which would have been most expensive project in TransCanada's history.

That is because it was proposed in requests from oil companies to help them reach new markets by expanding the capacity of North America's only pipeline with access to the West Coast of Canada.

That was because it was proposed in requests from oil companies to help them reach new markets by expanding the capacity of North America's only pipeline with access to the West Coast.

That was because it was proposed in requests form oil companies to help them reach new markets by expanding the capacity of North America's only pipeline with access to the West Coast of Canada.

The company proposed constructing a pipeline that stretched from northern Pennsylvania through Broome, Chenango, Delaware and Schoharie counties.

In another twist in the Cuomo administration's Competitive Power Ventures scandal, the pipeline company building a nearly eight - mile natural gas line to the proposed CPV plant is suing the state for what it claims is an unlawful delay of the project.

More than 700 parcels of land are affected by the proposed pipeline, and 120 landowners face losing property to the gas company under eminent domain.

We know that another pipeline that covers some of the same route as the proposed pipeline, and built by the same company proposing to build Keystone XL, already leaked 14 times over its first year of operation.

The State Department's «don't worry» environmental impact statement for the proposed Keystone XL tarsands pipeline, released late Friday afternoon, was written not by government officials but by a private company in the pay of the pipeline's owner.

The Constitution Pipeline Project — a joint venture between four oil and gas companies — was proposed to transport fracked natural gas from Susquehanna County in Pennsylvania through Broome, Chenango, Delaware, and Schoharie counties in New York to existing interstate pipelines.

With a focus on 17 primary target banks, they call on «individuals, businesses, organizations and governments to withdraw their money from these banks» until they stop financing Enbridge, Kinder Morgan and TransCanada, the companies behind the Dakota Access Pipeline and four proposed new tar sands pipelines projects.

Politico (4/15/13) reports: «APPAREL COMPANY PATAGONIA ORGANIZING AGAINST KEYSTONE: The gear, clothing and apparel company Patagonia is blasting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline -LCOMPANY PATAGONIA ORGANIZING AGAINST KEYSTONE: The gear, clothing and apparel company Patagonia is blasting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline -Lcompany Patagonia is blasting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline -LSB-...]

In order to build the pipeline, Transcanada, the company who proposed Keystone XL, must get the OK from the State Department.

The gut - check issue for McKibben and his supporters — thousands of whom turned out for a mass demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 17 — is the Keystone XL pipeline, a 3,400 - mile pipe proposed by oil infrastructure company TransCanada that will allow crude oil extracted from the tar sands of Alberta, in southern Canada, to be refined on the Gulf of Mexico.

TransCanada, the «energy transfer company» responsible for getting the incredibly dirty diluted bitumen oil from the tar sands in western Canada, and also potentially Bakken crude, to refineries in Quebec City and St. Johns, New Brunswick, has notified the Canadian government that it is cancelling its proposed Energy East pipeline project, citing slowing growth in -LSB-...]

The continuing dispute between British Columbia and Texas pipeline company Kinder Morgan over the proposed $ 7.4 - billion Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC expansion, from Alberta to British Columbia, is heading to the courts, with one senator urging Ottawa to ask the SCC to decide on the issue.

The continuing dispute between British Columbia and Texas pipeline company Kinder Morgan over the proposed $ 7.4 - billion Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC expansion, from Alberta to B.C., is heading to the courts, with one senator urging Ottawa to ask the SCC to decide on the issue.

When Kinder Morgan, the Texas based transnational oil company, faced wide spread opposition to clear cutting and seismic testing for a proposed pipeline expansion on Burnaby Mountain Conservation Land, the corporation applied to the Supreme Court of BC for an injunction against protestors.

And one day after the Texas energy company lobbied the top public servant at Natural Resources Canada, officials warned the proposed pipeline would be «abandoned» if delays were significant.

«There's no question, in the case of pipelines, that it's a federal decision» whether to permit the expansion, says Gregory McDade, managing partner at Ratcliff & Company LLP in Vancouver and legal counsel for the City of Burnaby, where the proposed expansion would terminate.