Sentences with phrase «company trademarked the term»

The company trademarked the term «storm chips» and set out to develop a bag that would live up to the name.

Not exact matches

The company also fought back with a counterclaim seeking to have the «froyo» trademark expunged, arguing the term is generic in the same way that «shake» is now short for milkshake.
People often refer to indoor cycling as «spinning,» but the companies typically avoid using that trademarked term.
Companies with a location in the KC Animal Health Corridor — which is a trademarked and Federally designated term — represent 56 percent of total worldwide animal health, diagnostics and pet food sales, making Kansas City the capital of the corridor.
Trademark — In business terms, a trademark is a symbol or word used to represent a companyTrademark — In business terms, a trademark is a symbol or word used to represent a companytrademark is a symbol or word used to represent a company's image.
Any use of the the term, phrase, or company name «Jolly Jumps» is not permitted unless explicit written permission has been provided by the trademark owner.
You have no right to use any such Trademarks, and nothing contained in this web site or the Terms of Use grants any right to use (by implication, waiver, estoppel or otherwise) any Trademarks without the prior written permission of Atlantic Coca - Cola Bottling Company or the respective owner.
The Trademarks in this website are registered or unregistered trade marks of or are licensed to Accolade Wines Limited (company number 137407), Accolade Wines Australia Limited (ABN 86 008 273 907); or a holding or subsidiary company of the same (as such terms are defined by the UK Companies Act 2006).
I recently found out that a small company has trademarked the term fire cider ™ and manufacture and sell it.
We previously thought this lower - cost Tesla sedan would be called the Model E, but after the company abandoned that trademark, all bets were off in terms of the nomenclature of this 3 Series - fighter.
Guess what the Cupertino based company is charged with — trademark infringement over the term... [Read more...]
Today Apple was denied a trademark for the term «Multi-Touch» in a bid to own a very popular term used by many companies.
Guess what the Cupertino based company is charged with — trademark infringement over the term iPad, which in turn is the biggest product that has propelled Apple to stratospheric heights of success in recent times.
Apple revealed in its lawsuit that trademark rights to the term iPad has been sold by a Proview subsidiary in Taiwan to «IP Applications,» a company based in the UK.
Motorola looks to be gearing up for the launch of a major product or product line known as Motorola Xoom, with the Illinois - based company having been quietly applying for trademarks on that term all over the world since mid-October.
Although many companies use code - names to refer to some products that are still in the development stage, the carrier has applied to trademark the term Xyboard.
Even if the term itself had been trademarked, the same result would have happened since it is basically impossible to police people's use of words, and the companies would have been stuck with just advertising campaigns begging people not to use such language.
In the event that You misuse any trademark, patent, design right or copyright in violation of these Terms, the World Photography Organisation and / or its subsidiaries and / or affiliates and / or associated companies and / or Event Partners will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including the seeking of criminal prosecution.
The Company name, the terms «Visual News», «Column Five», the Company logo and all related names, logos, product and service names, designs and slogans are trademarks of the Company or its affiliates or licensors.
For larger game companies and publishers, Stephen performs more targeted legal work such as applying for trademarks and copyrights, enforcing intellectual property, and drafting privacy policies and terms of use.
Yesterday, Minnesota - based law practice blog Lawyerist filed a federal lawsuit (PDF) against PeerViews, Inc., parent company of New York — based law blog TechnoLawyer, to invalidate its trademarks on the terms BigLaw and SmallLaw.
The motion was filed after the Office québécois de la langue française pressured the companies and several others located in Québec, to add a descriptive term in French to their trademarks displayed in English only on the fronts of their establishments.
David Canton of eLegal notes, and questions, a US Court of Appeals ruling that Google's sale of a trademarked term as a keyword to a competing company may be a «use in commerce» and therefore illegal.
State Farm has licenced the use of the State Farm three oval logo, the term «State Farm», and other State Farm owned trademarks to Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company, Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company and State Farm Investor Services (Canada) Co., and Zag Bank.
State Farm has licensed the use of the State Farm three oval logo, the term «State Farm» and other State Farm owned trademarks to Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company, Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company, State Farm Investor Services (Canada) Co., Zag Bank, and Desjardins Living Benefits Inc..
LG Electronics recently filed to trademark the terms «Icon» and «Iconic» with the USPTO which the company's filings associated with smartphones and smartwatches, respectively, as first noticed by industry insider Evan Blass.
You agree to indemnify and hold the Company, its parent company, affiliates, officers, agents, partners and employees harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising out of your content and materials, your use of the Site, your violation of these Terms or your violation of any third party's rights including such party's copyrights and tradCompany, its parent company, affiliates, officers, agents, partners and employees harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising out of your content and materials, your use of the Site, your violation of these Terms or your violation of any third party's rights including such party's copyrights and tradcompany, affiliates, officers, agents, partners and employees harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising out of your content and materials, your use of the Site, your violation of these Terms or your violation of any third party's rights including such party's copyrights and trademarks.
You represent and warrant for the benefit of the Company, the Company's suppliers, and any third parties mentioned on the Site, in addition to other representations and obligations contained in these Terms, that: (a) you possess the legal right and ability to enter into and make the representations and warranties contained in these Terms; (b) all information submitted by you to the Site is true and accurate; (c) you will not use the Site for any purpose that is unlawful or prohibited by these Terms; (d) you are the owner of the Materials and they are original to you; (e) the Materials do not infringe any third party right, such as copyright, trademark, and publicity / privacy right; (f) the Materials do not constitute defamation or libel or otherwise violate the law, and (g) you agree to defend, indemnify, and hold the Company (and its employees, representative, agents, and assigns) harmless from breaches of (a) through (g).
Readers pointed out to us that HardiePlank is a trademarked term of James Hardie Industries, a Dutch - based company with an extensive U.S. presence.
She brought a claim against the company that developed the subdivision, which operates a division of its business called «Westhaven Realty» and has a trademark in the term Westhaven, seeking to cancel trademark registrations on the word Westhaven.
(The company can't use MLS in Canada, where the term is trademarked by CREA.)
Ruling that the trial court did not apply the proper test in analyzing the Website's fair use defense, the court sent the case back to the trial court to apply the above test to determine whether the Website's use of the Companies» trademarked terms constituted a fair use.
Nothing in these Terms of Use grants you any right to use any trademark, service mark, logo, and / or the name of jones design company or its Affiliates.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z