Sentences with phrase «company valuation multiple»

We track these and have found that for private company exits, we can find about 35 % with valuations for private companies (real or rumored) and make these available on our private company valuation multiple search tool.

In the case of the latter, he looks at divesting a business that is either dragging down the companies valuation multiple or not getting the multiple it deserves.

Not exact matches

While that's higher than peers such as Nikon and Canon, which have sales multiples closer to 1, it's still quite low compared to the valuations of other companies in the tech world.

The deal also reportedly boosts Vice's valuation to $ 5.7 billion, according to multiple reports, though the companies did not disclose the size of TPG's minority stake in Vice.

While valuation for all companies depends on growth and momentum, a Software as a Service business such as Salesforce or Workday typically also takes into account customer churn percentage and multiples of monthly recurring revenue (MRR).

Kostin also outlined three strategies: Secular growth, or companies where sales growth is expected to rise at least 10 percent for multiple years without high valuations; firms that are investing in capital expenditures and research and development; and companies with a strong chance to be acquired.

So we took a look at our data on private market valuation multiples to see how publicly - traded cloud storage and file - sharing company Box compares to still - private Dropbox.

Despite being the core drivers of their businesses, they are left with a small percentage of their companies due to multiple financings at low, early stage valuations.

E-commerce company Wish is raising around $ 250 million in new funding at a valuation north of $ 8 billion, Axios has learned from multiple sources.

In late 2015, many public technology companies saw a significant retrenchment in their share prices primarily as a result of a reduction in valuation multiples.

The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its reasonable valuation levels and largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures.

The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its revenue growth, reasonable valuation levels, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures and notable return on equity.

The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its reasonable valuation levels, expanding profit margins, largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures and notable return on equity.

The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures and reasonable valuation levels.

If accounting earnings actually drove valuations, then companies with high EPS growth should command higher multiples, and companies with low or negative EPS growth should have lower PE multiples.

But in the late 90s, when small technology companies with excessive valuation premiums displaced big businesses from the large - cap universe, investors who thought large caps were low risk got a double whammy — large - cap stocks» earnings and P / E multiples both declined sharply.

We believe that the company can command an even higher valuation multiple in the years ahead that would bring it more in line with other high quality, financial - technology service providers.

The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its notable return on equity, attractive valuation levels, expanding profit margins, good cash flow from operations and increase in stock price during the past year.

For clarity, we are seeing that revenue multiples, defined as a company's yearend implied company valuation divided by its yearend revenues, have declined during the 2012 - 2014 time frame.

A company capable of boasting sustained gross profit margins that are materially higher than its peers is almost always more efficient, better run, and a safer long - term investment provided the valuation multiple isn't too high.

In addition to liking BMC's products, we liked the company's aggressive share repurchases and its valuation, which is much lower than the multiple of sales at which many similar companies have been acquired.

Ferragamo May Seek Higher IPO Rating Than Prada (Bloomberg)» [Salvatore Ferragamo] may seek a higher valuation multiple than its bigger rival Prada SpA... [the company] may be valued at as much as 2.25 billion euros ($ 3.2 billion), or 26 times estimated 2012 profit.»

Financial Statements Valuing a Company Based on Its Revenues The price - to - sales ratio is considered to be one of the ï ¿ 1/2 cleanestï ¿ 1/2 valuation multiples; it is also more tied to profit margin than you may realize.

That said, a larger - than - expected QE program should be a tailwind for European cyclical companies as it would expand multiples, in much the same way that U.S. QE has driven valuations higher.

In order to add more quantity of such a stock at expensive valuation, the conviction of the investor should come from how accurately he could calculate and visualize the future earnings of the company provided the valuation multiple remains the same or within a range.

Price - to - book (P / B) ratio as a valuation multiple is useful for value comparison between similar companies within the same industry when they follow a uniform accounting method for asset valuation.

The sell - side in these types of situations tends to value companies at peak multiples of trough earnings, and only shifts to the more mid-cycle earnings and valuation we use when there's clear evidence the cycle has turned.

From those levels large companies began an impressive multi-year rally in valuation multiples.

The stock's current valuation seems reasonable considering the company's stability, but I'd prefer to own the stock at a somewhat lower cash flow multiple for a greater margin of safety.

With limited analyst coverage and low trading liquidity, many high - quality small companies are «lost in the shuffle» and trade at significantly lower valuation multiples than larger firms.

And that's why value investing tends to work: companies with cheap valuations improve, and multiples expand.

But for the valuation of a company, a multiple is applied.

Given Visteon's multiple internal and external catalyst's, highly attractive absolute valuation and the outsized spread between the company's «when issued» shares and the already depressed valuation's of its global competitors, we think that the stars are aligning for bargain hunting investors to generate spectacular returns of 30 % + in a short period of time with relatively low risk.

That being said, even at today's historically attractive valuation multiples, investors should likely only expect to earn a potential total annual return of about 5.9 % to 6.9 % (1.9 % yield plus 4 % to 5 % annual earnings growth) over the next decade, far below the company's historical return rate and the returns offered by most other dividend aristocrats.

Even if they did, and you value the company at an appropriate P / E and / or P / S multiple based on those metrics, I'd be hard pressed to come up with a valuation much higher than today's market price.

Value investors tend to focus far too much attention on this potential change in the valuation multiple, and often ignore what's otherwise a company that offers a poor return on capital.

CRH's FY - 2015 EBIT margin was 5.6 %, which compares to a peak 9.9 % margin (back in 2007)-- so relying on the company's actual Op FCF margin (of 8.3 %) seems appropriate here for valuation purposes & deserves a 0.75 P / S multiple.

But the firm's research indicates that stock buybacks do not change investors» estimates for long - term earnings - per - share growth, or induce them to accord a company a higher valuation multiple.

With a more hedge fund like multiple of 10 % of AUM the company should be worth 32M, and with 20M in assets we would get a valuation at 52M.

I think the above exhibits show that on the basis of current public company valuations, a direct competitor valuation, EGI's previous public company valuations and recent transaction multiples that the company is significantly undervalued from a number of perspectives.

Sure, there's lots of companies & sectors which clearly deserve a variety of different valuation approaches, ratios & metrics — but on the other hand, the same operating margin and / or earnings growth rate (for example) surely doesn't deserve a ridiculously higher multiple in one sector vs. another.

Obviously with tech companies and their cash holdings, their approaches to stock comp / buybacks / repatriation / capex through acquisition etc have to be borne in mind, and how much of it is effectively working capital in one form or another — but it occurred to me that there are a few companies out there where cash balances could make a material difference to valuation (even more so than picking the right multiples with some!)

As a result, the distribution of S&P 500 P / E multiples was now its tightest in at least 25 years, implying less differentiation of companies based on valuation.

By simply valuing the profits of a Darwin's Darling at their own market multiple, these buyers delivered a valuation to selling shareholders that far exceeded any share price the company might have independently achieved.

Unlike my individual company stock picks, I obviously have no specific Fair Value Price Target — I'm relying on my bullish oil / commodity view, continued Russian growth (and financial strength), and an improvement in market sentiment and valuation multiples.

The company's current valuation multiple appears to account for potential risks in the business.

The Aquirer's Multiple is a valuation method that attempts to find attractively priced companies that may be considered for take over.

It might be foolish setting this price target, because the outcome's probably binary... Once they're comfortable with an investment thesis, plus a valuation multiple / range, investors are loathe to change their minds... so if necessary, companies often have the time / space to grow into any valuation eventually.

Alas, the obvious challenge for all of us is: i) how to (reliably) find those long - term high - quality / high - growth companies, and ii) then overcome your natural aversion to a valuation that's a large premium or even a multiple of the market average...

I consider my valuation multiple a reasonable compromise between higher sector multiples & the risk of a devastating client loss... Plus it allows me to (fairly) comfortably apply a (positive) debt adjustment: Based on the company's 4.7 M of (annualized) adjusted operating profit (& zero debt), management could easily draw down 14.2 M of debt for expansion, acquisitions, etc. — as usual, I'll haircut this by 50 %.